Advertisement

Introduction

  • Alexa Alice Joubin
  • Aneta Mancewicz
Chapter
Part of the Reproducing Shakespeare book series (RESH)

Abstract

This chapter introduces new theoretical foundations for understanding aspects of the Shakespeare myth beyond bardolatry and provides definitions of key terms. Myth is introduced from several perspectives: literary (Northrop Frye), semiological (Roland Barthes), materialist (Graham Holderness), and theatrical (Heiner Müller). It is defined as a story that presents itself as true through a particular framing of events and that plays an ideological role. Contradictory myths are the foundation to many conversations about Shakespeare today. Taking up where Graham Holderness left off in his landmark volume The Shakespeare Myth (1988), this chapter delineates the ways in which international films and performances construct myths of Shakespeare’s moral authority and use value.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1902. Poetics. Trans. S.H. Butcher. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 1991. Mythologies. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bate, Jonathan. 2008. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  4. Bhatia, Nandi. 2004. Acts of Authority/Acts of Resistance: Theatre and Politics in Colonial and Post-Colonial India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohannan, Laura. 1966. Shakespeare in the Bush. Natural History 75 (August–September): 28–33.Google Scholar
  6. Burnett, Mark Thornton Burnett. 2013. Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dromgoole, Dominic. 2017. Hamlet Globe to Globe. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frye, Northrop. 1961. Myth, Fiction, and Displacement. Daedalus 90 (3, Summer): 587–605.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1990. Myth and Metaphor: Selected Essays, 1974–1988. Ed. Robert D. Denham. Charlottesville/London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Gollancz, Israel, and Gordon McMullan. 2016. A Book of Homage to Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Greenblatt, Stephen. 2016. General Introduction. In The Norton Shakespeare, ed. Stephen Greenblatt et al., 3rd ed., 1–74. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Hackett, Helen. 2009. Shakespeare and Elizabeth: The Meeting of Two Myths. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgon, Barbara. 1998. The Shakespeare Trade: Performance and Appropriation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  14. Hoenselaars, Ton, and Ángel-Luis Pujante. 2003. Shakespeare and Europe: An Introduction. In Four Hundred Years of Shakespeare in Europe, ed. Ángel-Luis Pujante and Ton Hoenselaars, 15–25. Newark/London: University of Delaware Press/Associated University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Holderness, Graham. 1988a. Bardolatry: Or, The Cultural Materialist’s Guide to Stratford-upon-Avon. In The Shakespeare Myth, ed. Graham Holderness, 1–15. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1988b. Preface: ‘All This’. In The Shakespeare Myth, ed. Graham Holderness, xi–xvi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2001. Cultural Shakespeare: Essays in the Shakespeare Myth. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  18. Joubin, Alexa Alice. 2017. Tang Xianzu and Shakespeare. Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 86, NPR One and Folger podcast, Moderated by Barbara Bogaev and Michael Witmore. Washington, DC: NPR One, November.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, Dennis, ed. 1993. Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Knowles, Ric. 2004. Reading the Material Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kronborg Castle. 2017. http://kongeligeslotte.dk. Accessed 15 May 2017.
  22. Loomba, Ania, and Martin Orkin, eds. 1998. Post-Colonial Shakespeares. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Magill, Tom. 2011. Sarah Werner’s Interview with Mickey B Director Tom Magill. Shakespeare Quarterly Forum Archives. Published December 6. http://titania.folger.edu/blogs/sq/forum/?p=399. Accessed 25 Feb 2016.
  24. Massai, Sonia, ed. 2006. World-Wide Shakespeares: Local Appropriations in Film and Performance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Müller, Heiner. 2001. Shakespeare a Difference. In A Heiner Müller Reader: Plays, Poetry, Prose, ed. and trans. Carl Weber, 118–121. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. National Theatre Live. 2017. About Us. http://ntlive.nationaltheatre.org.uk/about-us. Accessed 17 July 2017.
  27. Orkin, Martin. 2005. Local Shakespeares: Proximations and Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Royal Shakespeare Company. 2016. https://www.rsc.org.uk/about-us/key-dates. Accessed 21 Mar 2016.
  29. Schaubühne. 2017. Hamlet. http://www.schaubuehne.de/en/productions/hamlet.html. Accessed 17 July 2017.
  30. Thompson, Ayanna. 2013. Passing Strange: Shakespeare, Race, and Contemporary America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet. 1996. Directed by Baz Luhrmann. Century City, Los Angeles: Twentieth Century Fox, 2002. DVD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexa Alice Joubin
    • 1
  • Aneta Mancewicz
    • 2
  1. 1.George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations