Advertisement

Teaching Critical Writing in the World Theatre Course: WAC Pedagogy and the Scaffolded Research Paper

  • Kelly Aliano
  • Dongshin Chang
Chapter

Abstract

A common issue that theatre professors may struggle with is balancing course content with significant writing requirements. How do we make our students better writers and critical thinkers while maintaining time for course content? Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) pedagogy and practices, such as scaffolded writing, teaching collaboration, and peer review, offer a student-centered model for addressing this issue and facilitate student academic success. In this paper, we offer an example of a scaffolded approach to the research paper assignment designed for our World Theatre courses at City University of New York–Hunter College. We first discuss WAC pedagogy and practices as implemented in other fields and their research findings. We then lay out the scaffolding design of our research paper assignment and explain the various exercises and activities we implemented throughout the semester. Next, we discuss three different case studies to exhibit the usefulness of scaffolded design for three unique student types, before turning our attention to the benefits of the scaffolded process. We conclude by describing our assessment tools and the rationale behind these grading methods, along with reflections on the process as well as recommendations for its implementation in other courses.

References

  1. Aries, Nancy. 2010. Writing Across the Curriculum at CUNY: A Ten-Year Review. CUNY: Office of Undergraduate Education. http://www2.cuny.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/about/administration/offices/undergraduate-studies/wac/WAC10YearReportJune2010.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  2. Bean, John C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Cho, Kwangsu, and Christian D. Schunn. 2007. Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Peer Review System. Computers & Education 48: 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciabattari, Teresa. 2013. Creating a Culture of Good Writing: A Cumulative Model for Teaching Writing in the Sociology Major. Teaching Sociology 41 (1): 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Defazio, Joseph, Josette Jones, Felisa Tennant, and Sara Anne Hook. 2010. Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing Across the Curriculum—A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2): 34–47.Google Scholar
  6. Eaton, Carrie Diaz, and Stephanie Wade. 2014. Collaborative Learning Through Formative Peer Review with Technology. Primus 24 (6): 529–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forsyth, Donelson R. 2016. College Teaching: Practical Insights from the Science of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Grimm, Stephanie Dehning. 2015. Learning Logs: Incorporating Writing-to-Learn Assignments into Accounting Courses. Issue in Accounting Education 30 (2): 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagenauer, Gerda, and Simone E. Volet. 2014. Teacher-Student Relationship at University: An Important Yet Under-Researched Field. Oxford Review of Education 40 (3): 370–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirby, Dawn Latta. 2016. Reading and Writing Relationships: Narratives at the Core of the English Classroom. English Journal 105 (3): 43–48.Google Scholar
  11. Komarraju, Meera, Sergey Musulkin, and Gargi Bhattacharya. 2010. Role of Student-Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement. Journal of College Student Development 51 (3): 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luthy, Karlen E., Neil E. Peterson, Jane H. Lassetter, and Lynn C. Callister. 2009. Successfully Incorporating Writing Across the Curriculum with Advanced Writing in Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 48 (1): 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, and Caroline Breslin. 2014. Rethinking Feedback Practice in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Randolph, Gary B. 2000. Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach. Journal of Engineering Education 89 (2): 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharp, Julie E., John N. Harb, and Ronald E. Terry. 1997. Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education 86 (2): 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shibley, Ivan A., Jr., Louis M. Milakofsky, and Cynthia L. Nicotera. 2001. Incorporating a Substantial Writing Assignment into Organic Chemistry: Library Research, Peer Review, and Assessment. Journal of Chemical Education 78 (1): 50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soysa, Champika K., Dana S. Dunn, Andrea L. Dottolo, Alyson L. Burns-Glover, and Regan A.R. Gurung. 2013. Orchestrating Authorship: Writing Across the Psychology Curriculum. Teaching of Psychology 40 (2): 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Umbach, Paul D., and Matthew R. Wawrzynski. 2005. Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Research in Higher Education 46 (2): 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. WAC Clearinghouse. 2017. An Introduction to Writing Across the Curriculum. Colorado State University. https://wac.colostate.edu/intro/. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  20. Williamson, Michael M. 1987. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines I: An Historical and Theoretical Introduction. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (1): 57–69.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1988. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines II: The Structure of Programs, Implications for Basic Writers, and Strategies for Teaching. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (2): 72–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Aliano
    • 1
  • Dongshin Chang
    • 1
  1. 1.City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations