Diagnostic Methods: Cutaneous Provocation Tests in Contact Urticaria Syndrome
Skin tests are important in the diagnosis of contact urticaria syndrome and can usually be carried out quickly, inexpensively, and safely. The skin prick test remains the investigation of choice for most patients with immunological contact urticaria in addition to its wider application in the diagnosis of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and food allergy. If skin prick tests and in vitro tests for allergen-specific IgE are negative, a provocation/challenge test may ultimately be required for diagnosis. Nonstandardized tests for contact urticaria include open testing, closed chamber testing, and scratch and scratch-chamber testing. Correct technique is essential to avoid false-negative results, which may put the patient at ongoing risk of exposure, and false-positive results, which can have important social, occupational, and medicolegal consequences. Staff carrying out these procedures should be appropriately trained and equipped to handle severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis.
KeywordsSkin prick test Open test Scratch test Scratch-chamber test Nonimmunological contact urticaria Immunological contact urticaria Immediate-type hypersensitivity Challenge/provocation/usage test
I am grateful to Dr Sophie Farooque, Consultant Allergist, for her helpful comments on this manuscript.
- 2.Amin S, Maibach HI. Immunologic contact urticaria definition. Chapter 2. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, editors. Contact urticaria syndrome. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 11–26.Google Scholar
- 4.Hannuksela M. Skin tests for immediate hypersensitivity. Chapter 26. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Freosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 3rd ed: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2001. p. 521–6.Google Scholar
- 5.Lahti A. Nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Chapter 1. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, editors. Contact urticaria syndromee. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 5–10.Google Scholar
- 10.Bryden M. Skin prick testing in clinical practice. Norfolk: NADAAS; 2000.Google Scholar
- 11.Resuscitation Council UK. Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions; guidelines for healthcare providers. 2008. https://www.resus.org.uk/anaphylaxis/emergency-treatment-of-anaphylactic-reactions/
- 15.Henzgen M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Erdmann S, et al. Skin testing with food alleergens. Guidelines of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Physicians’Association of German Allergologists (ADA) and the Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA)together with the Swiss Society of Allergology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6:983–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, van de Wegg WE, van der Heide S, Dubois AE. Where to prick the apple for skin testing? Allergy. 2013;68:119608.43.Google Scholar
- 18.Turjanmaa K, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Reunala T, et al. Natural rubber latex allergy. The European experience. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 1995;15:71–87.Google Scholar