Advertisement

Country Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • Michel Henry Bouchet
  • Charles A. Fishkin
  • Amaury Goguel
Chapter

Abstract

Organizations face various choices as they seek to manage Country Risk. If they understand their exposure to this risk, they can further evaluate (i) the approaches available to mitigate it; (ii) the costs relative to the benefits; and (iii) any additional or new issues they may incur, including credit, market, and operational risk. The foundation or any strategy to mitigate Country Risk is careful assessment based on rigorous research. Among the most traditional approaches to mitigate Country Risks are risk limits and diversification of suppliers, trading counterparties, and banks. Other approaches involve guarantees, financial hedging transactions, master netting agreements, and collateral. Various governmental and multilateral organization provide sources of additional support to protect against the risks relating to exports and trade financing, including the World Bank, the Multilateral Investments Guarantee Agency, the International Finance Corporation, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Coface, and various export credit agencies.

Keywords

Guarantees Risk limits Diversification Credit default swaps Master netting agreements Collateral Multilateral agencies Dispute settlement 

References

  1. Asian Development Bank. 2017. “Viet Nam: Cofinancing.” https://www.adb.org/countries/viet-nam/cofinancing.
  2. Business and Human Rights Resource Center. 2014. “Total Lawsuit in Belgium (re Myanmar).” https://business-humanrights.org/en/total-lawsuit-in-belgium-re-myanmar.
  3. Chevron. 2017. “Human Rights Respect for Human Rights Is Rooted in Our Values and Applies Wherever We Do Business.” Corporate Responsibility. https://www.chevron.com/corporate-responsibility/people/human-rights.
  4. International Finance Corporation. 2016. “Mobilizing Large-Scale Financing for Infrastructure.” Impact at IFC, October.Google Scholar
  5. LafargeHolcim. 2017. “LafargeHolcim Responds to Syria Review.” Press Release, March 3. http://www.lafargeholcim.com/LafargeHolcim-responds-syria-review.
  6. Mapila, Kopo, Morten Lauridsen, and Carl Chastenay 2017. “Mobilizing Institutional Investments into Emerging Market Infrastructure.” Note No 36. EMCompass. IFC, April.Google Scholar
  7. Masud, Faarea. 2017. “Chevron Says It Will Push for Myanmar Human Rights.” BBC News, November 16. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-41977909.
  8. MIGA. 2015. “MIGA’s Support to the Middle East and North Africa.” Brief MENA. https://www.miga.org/documents/menabrief.pdf.
  9. Noonan, Laura. 2017. “Vietnam’s Nascent Debt Markets Set for Bigger Deals.” Financial Times, December 13.Google Scholar
  10. Reuters. 2014. “Tunisia Issues $825 Million Bonds in the Domestic Japanese Market.” October 10.Google Scholar
  11. Walt, Vivienne. 2010. “Chevron, Total Accused of Human-Rights Abuses in Burma.” Time, July 6.Google Scholar
  12. Wezel, Torsten. 2004. Does Co-Financing by Multilateral Development Banks Increase “Risky” Direct Investment in Emerging Markets?—Evidence for German Banking FDI.” Discussion Paper Series 1: Studies of the Economic Research Centre No 02/2004.Google Scholar
  13. World Bank and Rothschild & C. 2016. Utilizing World Bank Partial Guarantees in Support of Sovereign or Sub—Sovereign Commercial Debt Financings, August.Google Scholar
  14. World Bank. 2017. “Guarantees Program.” http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/guarantees-program.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Henry Bouchet
    • 1
  • Charles A. Fishkin
    • 2
  • Amaury Goguel
    • 3
  1. 1.Skema Business SchoolParis-Sophia Antipolis-Suzhou-RaleighFrance
  2. 2.ChappaquaUSA
  3. 3.Skema Business SchoolParis-Sophia Antipolis-Suzhou-RaleighFrance

Personalised recommendations