Advertisement

Common Applications of Ultrasound in Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery Procedures

  • Ximena Wortsman
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter reviews applications of ultrasound such as the detection of photoaging and frequent complications of cosmetic and plastic surgery procedures. Currently, ultrasound is a first-line imaging technique for the identification and management of these aesthetic procedures. Given the worldwide explosive growth of cosmetic and plastic surgery procedures, this chapter may help in dealing with these entities, which sometimes can be powerful simulators of other dermatologic conditions.

Keywords

Ultrasound cosmetics Ultrasound aesthetics Ultrasound plastic surgery Ultrasound fillers Ultrasound tensor threads Ultrasound hyaluronic acid Ultrasound silicone oil Ultrasound radiofrequency Ultrasound cryolipolysis Ultrasound photoaging Ultrasound abdominoplasty Ultrasound liposuction Ultrasound blepharoplasty 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Gilchrest BA. Photoaging. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(E1):E2–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/skinbio.2013.176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes MC, Bredoux C, Salas F, Lombard D, Strutton GM, Fourtanier A, Green AC. Comparison of histological measures of skin photoaging. Dermatology. 2011;223:140–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandby-Møller J, Wulf HC. Ultrasonographic subepidermal low-echogenic band, dependence of age and body site. Skin Res Technol. 2004;10:57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gniadecka M, Gniadecki R, Serup J, Søndergaard J. Ultrasound structure and digital image analysis of the subepidermal low echogenic band in aged human skin: diurnal changes and interindividual variability. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:362–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dermal fillers (soft tissue fillers). https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/cosmeticdevices/wrinklefillers/. Accessed 7 Dec 2017.
  6. 6.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dermal fillers approved by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/CosmeticDevices/WrinkleFillers/ucm227749.htm. Accessed 7 Dec 2017.
  7. 7.
    Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C, Cardenas G, Sazunic I, Jemec GB. Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:292–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wortsman X. Identification and complications of cosmetic fillers: sonography first. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1163–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Polyacrylamide fillers on skin ultrasound. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:660–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pérez-Pérez L, García-Gavín J, Wortsman X, Santos-Briz Á. Delayed adverse subcutaneous reaction to a new family of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with clinical, ultrasound, and histologic correlation. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43:605–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faundez E, Vega N, Vera E, Vega P, Sepulveda D, Wortsman X. Clinical and color Doppler ultrasound evaluation of polyacrylamide injection in HIV patients with severe facial lipoatrophy secondary to antiretroviral therapy. Skin Res Technol. 2017;23:243–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wortsman X, Quezada N. Ultrasound morphology of polycaprolactone filler. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:2611–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menis D, Castellanos-González M, Llamas-Martín R, Vanaclocha Sebastián F. The utility of skin ultrasound for the diagnosis of complications of tissue filler materials. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(8):797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ginat DT, Schatz CJ. Imaging features of midface injectable fillers and associated complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:1488–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grippaudo FR, Mattei M. High-frequency sonography of temporary and permanent dermal fillers. Skin Res Technol. 2010;16:265–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Moawad O, El-Fakahany H, Medhat W, Mahoney MG, Uitto J. Efficacy of mesotherapy in facial rejuvenation: a histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51:913–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sivagnanam G. Mesotherapy – the French connection. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1:4–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Córdoba S, Rojas E, Garrido-Ríos A, Borbujo J. Intense local reaction at the sites of injection of lipolytic mesotherapy. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:958–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee JC, Daniels MA, Roth MZ. Mesotherapy, microneedling, and chemical peels. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43:583–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tedeschi A, Lacarrubba F, Micali G. Mesotherapy with an intradermal hyaluronic acid formulation for skin rejuvenation: an intrapatient, placebo-controlled, long-term trial using high-frequency ultrasound. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;39:129–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krueger N, Mai SV, Luebberding S, Sadick NS. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:201–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ingargiola MJ, Motakef S, Chung MT, Vasconez HC, Sasaki GH. Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:1581–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vanaman M, Fabi SG, Carruthers J. Complications in the cosmetic dermatology patient: a review and our experience (part 1). Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vanaman M, Fabi SG, Carruthers J. Complications in the cosmetic dermatology patient: a review and our experience (part 2). Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:12–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sadick N, Rothaus KO. Aesthetic applications of radiofrequency devices. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43:557–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beasley KL, Weiss RA. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32:79–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marten TJ, Elyassnia D. Fat grafting in facial rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42:219–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sinno S, Wilson S, Brownstone N, Levine SM. Current thoughts on fat grafting: using the evidence to determine fact or fiction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:818–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Masi EC, De Masi FD, De Masi RD. Suspension threads. Facial Plast Surg. 2016;32:662–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Garvey PB, Ricciardelli EJ, Gampper T. Outcomes in threadlift for facial rejuvenation. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(5):482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rachel JD, Lack EB, Larson B. Incidence of complications and early recurrence in 29 patients after facial rejuvenation with barbed suture lifting. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:348–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suh DH, Jang HW, Lee SJ, Lee WS, Ryu HJ. Outcomes of polydioxanone knotless thread lifting for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:720–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tavares JP, Oliveira CACP, Torres RP, Bahmad F Jr. Facial thread lifting with suture suspension. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83:712–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wortsman X. Sonography of cosmetic procedures. In: Wortsman X, Jemec GBE, editors. Dermatologic ultrasound with clinical and histologic correlations. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Sonographic outcomes of cosmetic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W910–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kridel RWH, Patel S. Cheek and chin implants to enhance facelift results. Facial Plast Surg. 2017;33:279–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim YH, Jang TY. Porous high-density polyethylene in functional rhinoplasty: excellent long-term aesthetic results and safety. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014;22:14–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Siegel C, Gayer G, Katz DS. Imaging of cosmetic plastic procedures and implants in the body and their potential complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:707–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Telegrafo M, Moschetta M. Role of US in evaluating breast implant integrity. J Ultrasound. 2015;18:329–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Na HG, Jang YJ. Dorsal augmentation using alloplastic implants. Facial Plast Surg. 2017;33:189–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chia CT, Neinstein RM, Theodorou SJ. Evidence-based medicine: liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:267e–74e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Benito-Ruiz J, de Cabo F. Ultrasonography: a useful tool for plastic surgeons. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2014;38:561–71.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    de Castro EJ, Radwanski HN, Pitanguy I, Nahas F. Long-term ultrasonographic evaluation of midline aponeurotic plication during abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:333–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    di Summa PG, Wettstein R, Erba P, Raffoul W, Kalbermatten DF. Scar asymmetry after abdominoplasty: the unexpected role of seroma. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:461–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tadiparthi S, Shokrollahi K, Doyle GS, Fahmy FS. Rectus sheath plication in abdominoplasty: assessment of its longevity and a review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:328–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Naik MN, Honavar SG, Das S, Desai S, Dhepe N. Blepharoplasty: an overview. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2009;2:6–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Montes JR, Wilson AJ, Chang BL, Percec I. Technical considerations for filler and neuromodulator refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(12 Suppl):e1178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schatz CJ, Ginat DT. Imaging features of rhinoplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:216–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDIEPInstitute for Diagnostic Imaging and Research of the Skin and Soft TissuesSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Department of DermatologyPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options