Advertisement

Mechanically Assisted Electrochemical Degradation of Alumina-TiC Composites

  • Hetal U. Maharaja
  • Guigen ZhangEmail author
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Alumina-TiC composite material is a tough ceramic composite with excellent hardness, wear resistance and oxidation resistance in dry and high-temperature conditions. In aqueous conditions, however, it is likely to be electrochemically active facilitating charge transfer processes due to the conductive nature of TiC. For application as an orthopedic biomaterial, it is crucial to assess the electrochemical behavior of this composite, especially under a combined mechanical and electrochemical environment. In this study, we examined the mechanically assisted electrochemical performance of alumina-TiC composite in an aqueous environment. The spontaneous electrochemical response to brushing abrasion was measured. Changes in the magnitude of electrochemical current with abrasion test conditions and possible causal relationship to the alteration in surface morphology were examined. Results showed that the alumina matrix underwent abrasive wear with evidence of microploughing and grain boundary damage. Chemical analysis revealed TiO2 formation in the abraded region, indicating oxidation of the conductive TiC domain. Furthermore, wear debris from alumina abrasion appeared to affect reaction kinetics at the composite-electrolyte interface. From this work, we established that the composite undergoes abrasion assisted electrochemical degradation even in gentle abrasive conditions and the severity of degradation is related to temperature and conditions of test environment.

Keywords

Alumina-TiC Ceramic composite Abrasion Low load Oxidation Electrochemical Brushing Mechanically assisted electrochemical degradation Oxidative wear Microploughing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Department of Bioengineering and the Institute for Biological Interfaces of Engineering at Clemson University. Funding support for this work is provided by a storage media company through a research agreement with Clemson University under contract number 146422 and by the Institute for Biological Interfaces of Engineering at Clemson University.

References

  1. 1.
    Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE. Hard bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1998;27(4):283–92.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR, Leddy J, Zoski CG. Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications, vol. 2. New York: Wiley; 1980. p. 44–82.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilbert JL, Mali SA. Medical implant corrosion: electrochemistry at metallic biomaterial surfaces. In: Degradation of implant materials. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Royhman D, Patel M, Runa MJ, et al. Fretting-corrosion behavior in hip implant modular junctions: the influence of friction energy and pH variation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;62:570–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swaminathan V, Gilbert JL. Fretting corrosion of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V interfaces. Biomaterials. 2012;33(22):5487–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, et al. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(18):1655–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, et al. Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(10):865–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Begin-Colin S, Mocellin A, Stebut JV, et al. Alumina and alumina–TiN wear resistance in a simulated biological environment. J Mater Sci. 1998;33(11):2837–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lashneva VV, Kryuchkov YN, Sokhan SV. Bioceramics based on aluminum oxide. Glas Ceram. 1998;55(11):357–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garino J, Rahaman MN, Bal BS. The reliability of modern alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 2006;17(3):113–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skinner HB. Ceramic bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willmann G. Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;379:22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM, et al. The use of dense alumina–alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(12):1203–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nine MJ, Choudhury D, Hee AC, et al. Wear debris characterization and corresponding biological response: artificial hip and knee joints. Materials. 2014;7(2):980–1016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mittelmeier H, Heisel J. Sixteen-years' experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:64–72.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jianxin D, Zeliang D, Jun Z, et al. Unlubricated friction and wear behaviors of various alumina-based ceramic composites against cemented carbide. Ceram Int. 2006;32(5):499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fei YH, Huang CZ, Liu HL, et al. Mechanical properties of Al 2 O 3–TiC–TiN ceramic tool materials. Ceram Int. 2014;40(7):10205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guu YY, Lin JF, Ai CF. The tribological characteristics of titanium nitride, titanium carbonitride and titanium carbide coatings. Thin Solid Films. 1997;302(1–2):193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee SW, Morillo C, Lira-Olivares J, et al. Tribological and microstructural analysis of Al2O3/TiO 2 nanocomposites to use in the femoral head of hip replacement. Wear. 2003;255(7):1040–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cai KF, McLachlan DS, Axen N, et al. Preparation, microstructures and properties of Al2O3–TiC composites. Ceram Int. 2002;28(2):217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brama M, Rhodes N, Hunt J, et al. Effect of titanium carbide coating on the osseointegration response in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials. 2007;28(4):595–608.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shackelford JF, Han YH, Kim S, Kwon SH. CRC materials science and engineering handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sahoo P, Davim JP. Tribology of ceramics and ceramic matrix composites. In: Tribology for scientists and engineers. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oda K, Yoshio T. Hydrothermal corrosion of alumina ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1997;80(12):3233–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lauwers B, Kruth JP, Liu W, Eeraerts W, Schacht B, Bleys P. Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;149(1):347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Landfried R, Kern F, Burger W, Leonhardt W, Gadow R. Development of electrical discharge Machinable ZTA ceramics with 24 vol% of TiC, TiN, TiCN, TiB2 and WC as electrically conductive phase. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2013;10(3):509–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Avasarala B, Haldar P. Electrochemical oxidation behavior of titanium nitride based electrocatalysts under PEM fuel cell conditions. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55(28):9024–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meijs S, Fjorback M, Jensen C, Sørensen S, Rechendorff K, Rijkhoff NJ. Electrochemical properties of titanium nitride nerve stimulation electrodes: an in vitro and in vivo study. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang L, Koka RV. A study on the oxidation and carbon diffusion of TiC in alumina–titanium carbide ceramics using XPS and Raman spectroscopy. Mater Chem Phys. 1998;57(1):23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cowling RD, Hintermann HE. The corrosion of titanium carbide. J Electrochem Soc. 1970;117(11):1447–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cowling RD, Hintermann HE. The anodic oxidation of titanium carbide. J Electrochem Soc. 1971;118(12):1912–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kiran V, Srinivasu K, Sampath S. Morphology dependent oxygen reduction activity of titanium carbide: bulk vs. nanowires. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15(22):8744–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramirez AG, Kelly MA, Strom BD, et al. Carbon-coated sliders and their effect on carbon oxidation wear. Tribol Trans. 1996;39(3):710–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Contu F, Elsener B, Böhni H. Corrosion behaviour of CoCrMo implant alloy during fretting in bovine serum. Corros Sci. 2005;47(8):1863–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barril S, Debaud N, Mischler S, et al. A tribo-electrochemical apparatus for in vitro investigation of fretting–corrosion of metallic implant materials. Wear. 2002;252(9–10):744–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bratu F, Benea L, Celis JP. Tribocorrosion behaviour of Ni–SiC composite coatings under lubricated conditions. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;201(16):6940–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jianxin D, Tongkun C, Zeliang D, et al. Tribological behaviors of hot-pressed Al 2 O 3/TiC ceramic composites with the additions of CaF 2 solid lubricants. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2006;26(8):1317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jahanmir S. Wear transitions and tribochemical reactions in ceramics. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol. 2002;216(6):371–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yingjie L, Xingui B, Keqiang C. A study on the formation of wear debris during abrasion. Tribol Int. 1985;18(2):107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee GY, Dharan CKH, Ritchie RO. A physically-based abrasive wear model for composite materials. Wear. 2002;252(3):322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gamry Instruments. Basics of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Gamry Instruments: 20Primer; 2006. p. 202006.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gee MG. The formation of aluminium hydroxide in the sliding wear of alumina. Wear. 1992;153(1):201–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gates RS, Hsu M, Klaus EE. Tribochemical mechanism of alumina with water. Tribol Trans. 1989;32(3):357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gates JD. Two-body and three-body abrasion: a critical discussion. Wear. 1998;214(1):139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Azzi M, Szpunar JA. Tribo-electrochemical technique for studying tribocorrosion -behavior of biomaterials. Biomol Eng. 2007;24(5):443–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vitry V, Sens A, Kanta AF, et al. Wear and corrosion resistance of heat treated and as-plated duplex NiP/NiB coatings on 2024 aluminum alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2012;206(16):3421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioengineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Biological Interfaces of EngineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options