Advertisement

Decentering Whiteness in Feminist Bioethics: Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) as an Illustrative Case

  • Karey A. Harwood
Conference paper

Abstract

In 1999, Susan Wolf diagnosed what was missing in bioethics: “an analysis that places race, ethnicity, and gender at the center.” Since then, not enough progress has been made in “decentering” whiteness in bioethics. The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in the United States, and the bioethical discussion surrounding it, provides a window into the problem. Recent surveys of ART usage show racial disparities in access to ART and treatment outcomes. A personal testimony about egg freezing suggests a perceptual blindness when white experience is taken to be the norm. Nevertheless, bioethics, including feminist bioethics, has largely framed ART within the parameters of “normative whiteness.” This paper will argue that feminist bioethics needs to put race at the center of analysis and will suggest pathways for doing so. Decentering whiteness requires a consideration of epistemic limits and privilege, a reevaluation of the goals of feminism, and an embrace of empathy in service of a more responsive and flexible worldview.

Keywords

Assisted reproductive technologies Social egg freezing Racial disparity Intersectional feminism 

References

  1. Allen R. Is egg freezing only for white women? The New York Times, 21 May; 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/opinion/is-egg-freezing-only-for-white-women.html?smid=pl-share&_r=0.
  2. Collins PH. Defining black feminist thought. In: Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 1990. p. 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;43(6):1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Beauvoir S. The second sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovaney-Chevallier. New York: Vintage Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. DiAngelo R. Keynote address for spring symposium “policy and advocacy: intersectionality of poverty, race, and gender.” Department of Social Work. North Carolina State University, 30 Mar; 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg E, Larsen F, Catherino W, Zhang J, Armstrong A. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):888–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goold I, Savulescu J. In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics. 2009;23(1):47–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Pritchard N, Hickey M, Peate M, McBain J, Agresta F, Bayly C, Fisher J. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):575–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harding S. Introduction: standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In: Harding S, editor. The feminist standpoint reader: intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge; 2004. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. Harwood K. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics. 2009;23(1):39–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill M, Donald Royster G, Taneja M, Healy MW, Zarek S, Christy A, DeCherney A, Widra E, Devine K. Does elevated progesterone on day of oocyte maturation play a role in the racial disparities in IVF outcomes? Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:154–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoberman J. Why bioethics has a race problem. Hast Cent Rep. 2016;46(2):12–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooks B. Feminist theory: from margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  14. Hull G, Scott PB, Smith B. All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  15. Lasha. The colorblind sisterhood fantasy: black women voted for white women—and white women voted for themselves. Salon.com, 26 Nov; 2016. http://www.salon.com/2016/11/26/the-colorblind-sisterhood-fantasy-black-women-voted-for-white-women-and-white-women-voted-for-themselves/.
  16. LaVeist T. Minority populations and health: an introduction to health disparities in the United States. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005.Google Scholar
  17. Mills C. Philosophy raced, philosophy erased. In: Yancy G, editor. Reframing the practice of philosophy: bodies of color, bodies of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York; 2012. p. 45–70.Google Scholar
  18. Myser C. Differences from somewhere: the normativity of whiteness in bioethics in the United States. Am J Bioeth. 2013;3(2):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quinn M, Fujimoto V. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1119–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts D. Debating the case of health disparities: implications for bioethics and racial equality. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012;21:332–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberts D. Complicating the triangle of race, class and state: the insights of black feminists. Ethnic Racial Stud. 2014;37(10):1776–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers K. White women helped elect Donald Trump. The New York Times, 9 Nov; 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/01/us/politics/white-women-helped-elect-donald-trump.html
  23. Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. Oakland: University of California Press; 2017.Google Scholar
  24. Roth A. What does queer family equality have to do with reproductive ethics? Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2016;9(1):27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell CA. Questions of race in bioethics: deceit, disregard, disparity, and the work of decentering. Philos Compass. 2016;11(1):43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandberg S. Lean in: women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Seifer D, Frazier L, Grainger D. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1701–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wellons M, Fujimoto V, Baker V, Barrington D, Broomfield D, Catherino W, Richard-Davis G, Ryan M, Thornton K, Armstrong A. Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):406–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolf SM. Erasing difference: race, ethnicity, and gender in bioethics. In: Donchin A, Purdy LM, editors. Embodying bioethics: recent feminist advances. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1999. p. 65–81.Google Scholar
  30. Wylie A. Why standpoint matters. In: Figueroa R, Harding S, editors. Science and other cultures: issues in philosophies of science and technology. New York: Routledge; 2003. p. 26–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations