Disciplining Girls Through the Technological Fix: Modernity, Markets, Materials

  • Chris Bobel


The aim of this chapter is to make visible why many MHM organizations and social businesses favor product-based solutions, what I deem “technological fixes” or overly simplified interventions that introduce new problems. Products are tangible, relatable, measurable, and, many MHM advocates argue, a “foot in the door.” But they also rely on social constructions of the “the good body” as one contained and disciplined as well as the assumption that markets can fix social problems. Instead of troubling the gendered, body-negative views of menstruation, MHM promotes “management” by the good biocitizen. Hence, the “good period” is the one we don’t know about; the “good girl” is one who hides her menstruation, thus singularly burdening girls with MHM. In this way, MHM devolves to a consumerist path to modernity rather than a program for progressive social change.


  1. Amugsi, Dickson, Kanyiva Muindi, Blessing Mbery, Tilahun Haregu, and Abdhalah K. Ziraba. 2017. Solid Waste Management and Risks to Health in Urban Africa: A Study of Nairobi and Mombasa Cities in Kenya. African Population and Health Research Center.
  2. Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Columbia University and UNICEF. 2016. ‘MHM in Ten’: Advancing the MHM Agenda in Schools. Retrieved January 19, 2018.
  4. Dahlqvist, Anna. 2018. It’s Only Blood: Shattering the Taboo of Menstruation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Dubrova, Elena. 2013. Fault-Tolerant Design. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erol, Maral. 2014. From Opportunity to Obligation: Medicalization of Post-Menopausal Sexuality in Turkey. Sexualities 17 (1–2): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Fouché, Rayvon. 2012. From Black Inventors to One Laptop Per Child: Exporting A Racial Politics of Technology. In Race After the Internet, ed. Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White, 60–83. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Freidenfelds, Lara. 2010. Modern Period: Menstruation in Twentieth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gawell, Malin. 2012. Social Entrepreneurship: Action Grounded in Needs, Opportunities and/or Perceived Necessities? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 24 (4): 1071–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geertz, Alexandra, Lakshmi Iyer, Perri Kasen, Francesca Mazzola, and Kelly Peterson. 2016. An Opportunity to Address Menstrual Health and Gender Equity. FSG.
  12. Global Market for Feminine Hygiene Products to Reach US $15.2 Billion by 2017, According to New Report by Global Industry Analysts, Inc. PRWeb, 28 Feb 2012.
  13. Goldenberg, Jamie L., and Tomi-Ann Roberts. 2004. The Beast Within the Beauty: An Existential Perspective on the Objectification and Condemnation of Women. In Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology, ed. Jeff Greenberg, Sander L. Koole, and Tom Pyszczynski, 71–85. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Government of India. 2015. Menstrual Hygiene Management: National Guidelines. New Delhi: Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. Scholar
  15. India Today. 2014. Narendra Modi’s First Independence Day speech: Full Text. India Today, August 15.
  16. Joshi, Deepa, Gerlinde Buit, and Diana González-Botero. 2015. Menstrual Hygiene Management: Education and Empowerment for Girls? Waterlines 34 (1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan, Natasha, and Ketaki Gokhale. 2013. No Menstrual Hygiene for Indian Women Holds Economy Back. Bloomberg, July 24.
  18. Kissling, Elizabeth. 2012. Menstruation: It’s Not Like Anything Else. Menstruation Matters (blog), December 12.
  19. Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. 2014. Medicalising Menstruation: A Feminist Critique of the Political Economy of Menstrual Hygiene Management in South Asia. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 22: 1158. Scholar
  20. Layne, Linda. 2010. Introduction. In Feminist Technology, ed. Sharra Louise Vostral and Kate Boyer, 1–35. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, Emily. 1987/2001. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Mojola, Sanyu. 2015. Material Girls and Material Love: Consuming Femininity and the Contradictions of Post-Girl Power among Kenyan Schoolgirls. Continuum 29 (2): 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muralidharan, Arundati. 2018. Management of Menstrual Waste: Insights from India and Pakistan, Menstrual Hygiene Webinar Series, Part 4: Infrastructure Solutions and Menstrual Hygiene. June 21. Accessed 25 June 2018.
  24. Nguyen, Mimi Thi. 2012. The Gift of Freedom: War, Debt and Other Refugee Passages. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ortner, Sherry B. 1974. Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture? In Woman, Culture, and Society, ed. Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere, 68–87. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society: A Theoretical Overview. In Woman, Culture, and Society, ed. Michelle Zimbalist Rosaldo and Louise Lamphere, 17–42. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas. 2004. Biological Citizenship. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Rosner, Lisa. 2004. The Technological Fix: How People Use Technology to Create and Solve Problems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Saathi Pads. 2018. Sanitary Napkins Manufacturer - Saathi. Eco-friendly, Period. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.
  30. Sanabria, Emilia. 2016. Plastic Bodies: Sex Hormones and Menstrual Suppression in Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Subramaniam, Banu. 2000. Archaic Modernities: Science, Secularism, and Religion in Modern India. Social Text 64 (18): 3.Google Scholar
  32. SWaCH. 2017. SWaCH Red Dot Campaign. Filmed. YouTube video, 1 minute. Posted February 6, 2017.
  33. Tampax. 2017. Power over Periods. YouTube video, 15 seconds. Posted November 17, 2017.
  34. UNICEF Ghana. 2017. MHM Champions - Israel Laryea. YouTube video, 2 minutes, 10 seconds. Posted October 5, 2017.
  35. United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  36. Vostral, Sharra Louise. 2008. Under Wraps: A History of Menstrual Hygiene Technology. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. Walkling, Kathy, and Jessamijn Miedema. 2015. Eco Femme Response Response to Sinu Joseph’s Blog ‘Why India Doesn’t Need a Sanitary Pad Revolution. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.
  38. Weinbaum, Alys Eve, Lynn M. Thomas, Priti Ramamurthy, Uta G. Poiger, and Madeleine Yue Dong. 2008. The Modern Girl Around the World: Consumption, Modernity, and Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woldetsadik, Mahlet A. 2014. Women’s Menstrual Hygiene in India: The Health and Environmental Implications. The Rand Blog (blog), August 22.
  40. WomenStrong. 2017. WomenStrong International Launches Menstrual Education Campaigns to Reduce Obstacles Preventing Impoverished Girls From Finishing School. Press Release, 22 May. Washington, DC: WomenStrong International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Bobel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality StudiesUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations