Advertisement

Con: Should Varicocele Be Repaired in Azoospermic Infertile Men?

  • Peter T. K. Chan
Chapter

Abstract

The impact of varicoceles on male fertility status and the effect of varicocele repair in improving reproductive outcomes have long been a subject of controversy in male reproductive medicine. The current opinion held by experts representing various professional societies is that varicocele repair could lead to an overall improvement in male fertility status. The varicocele controversy has also sparked up a debate related specifically to a subgroup of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) on whether repair of clinical varicoceles could also lead to improvement in male fertility status that can ultimately lead to improved reproductive outcomes particularly in the context of assisted reproduction. In this debate, we will present our view, based on available evidence in the current literature, that varicocele repair should not be routinely performed in all men with NOA and clinical varicoceles. Clinicians are advised to be informed on the arguments from both sides of this important debate so that they can better formulate appropriate counselling strategies to infertile couples facing these common male factor infertility diagnoses.

Keywords

Non-obstructive azoospermia Varicocele Varicocele repair Debate Male infertility Varicocelectomy Micro-TESE ICSI Reproductive outcomes 

Notes

Disclaimer

The contents and the opinions presented in this chapter are for the purposes of academic exchange and education only and should not be used in isolation for any clinical decision making without a proper consultation with qualified healthcare professionals.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Meguid TA. Predictors of sperm recovery and azoospermia relapse in men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair. J Urol. 2012;187(1):222–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aboutaleb HA, Elsherif EA, Omar MK, Abdelbaky TM. Testicular biopsy histopathology as an Indicator of successful restoration of spermatogenesis after varicocelectomy in non-obstructive azoospermia. World J Mens Health. 2014;32(1):43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S247–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. The optimal evaluation of the infertile male: AUA best practice statement. Linthicum: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barazani Y, Nagler HM. Other work has highlighted the limitations of using histopathology to predict success after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernie AM, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Basic Clin Androl. 2013;23:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dabaja AA, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enatsu N, Chiba K, Fujisawa M. The development of surgical sperm extraction and new challenges to improve the outcome. Reprod Med Biol. 2015;15(3):137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esteves SC, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in men with treated and untreated varicocele: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):254–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Esteves SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(6):541–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gat SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(6):541–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haydardedeoglu B, Turunc T, Kilicdag EB, Gul U, Bagis T. The effect of prior varicocelectomy in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective pilot study. Urology. 2010;75(1):83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang K, Lamb DJ. Diagnostic testicular biopsy before varicocele repair plays a realistic and important role. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, Dikmen AV, Gürgan T, Ergen A. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1500–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson D, Sandlow J. Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):378–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, et al. European association of urology guidelines on male infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol. 2012;62:324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol. 1999;162(3 Pt 1):737–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kiraç M, Deniz N, Biri H. The effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Curr Urol. 2013;6(3):136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirby EW, Wiener LE, Rajanahally S, Crowell K, Coward RM. Undergoing varicocele repair before assisted reproduction improves pregnancy rate and live birth rate in azoospermic and oligospermic men with a varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee JS, Park HJ, Seo JT. What is the indication of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia? Urology. 2007;69(2):352–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2006. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(7):1536–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Pasqualotto FF, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, Pasqualotto EB, Lucon AM. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocelectomy repair: an update. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):635–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poulakis V, Ferakis N, de Vries R, Witzsch U, Becht E. Induction of spermatogenesis in men with azoospermia or severe oligoteratoasthenospermia after antegrade internal spermatic vein sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2006;8(5):613–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roque M, Esteves SC. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the diagnosis and management of varicocele in children and adolescents. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schlegel PN. Nonobstructive azoospermia: a revolutionary surgical approach and results. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Alternate indications for varicocele repair: non-obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(6):1288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schlegel PN, Kaufmann J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1585–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Predictive factors for sperm recovery after varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2017;197(2):485–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shridharani A, Owen RC, Elkelany OO, Kim ED. The significance of clinical practice guidelines on adult varicocele detection and management. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):269–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silber S. The varicocele argument resurfaces. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(6):1079–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tulloch WS. Consideration of sterility; subfertility in the male. Edinburg Med J. 1952;59:29–34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ustuner M, Yilmaz H, Yavuz U, Ciftci S, Saribacak A, Aynur BS, Yasar H, Culha MM. Varicocele repair improves testicular histology in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:709452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2010;183(6):2309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Youssef T, Abd-Elaal E, Gaballah G, Elhanbly S, Eldosoky E. Varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: is it beneficial? Int J Surg. 2009;7(4):356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zampieri N, Bosaro L, Costantini C, Zaffagnini S, Zampieri G. Relationship between testicular sperm extraction and varicocelectomy in patients with varicocele and nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology. 2013;82(1):74–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhi EL, Liang GQ, Li P, Chen HX, Tian RH, Xu P, Li Z. Seminal plasma miR-192a: a biomarker predicting successful resolution of nonobstructive azoospermia following varicocele repair. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(4):396–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter T. K. Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyMcGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations