Advertisement

Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Somatic Embryogenesis

  • Ahmad Tarmizi Hashim
  • Zamzuri Ishak
  • Samsul Kamal Rosli
  • Meilina Ong-Abdullah
  • Ooi Siew-Eng 
  • Mohd Naqiuddin Husri
  • Dalilah Abu Bakar
Chapter
Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 85)

Abstract

The effectiveness of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) breeding from seed remains the basis for long term genetic improvement. However, there is still considerable unexploited genetic variability within selected crosses, thus inducing interest in vegetative propagation via tissue culture. This method enables true-to-type reproduction of the best genotypes. Through this, further oil yield improvements can be expected, amongst other advantages. The success in producing oil palm clones has spurred oil palm organizations to set up their own tissue culture laboratories. The average estimated projection of 20% yield increase from clones compared to commercial seedlings makes planting with clones a potentially good investment. This chapter includes accounts of detailed in vitro propagation protocols using solid and liquid culture systems, nursery practices and quality control measures using physical and molecular screening tools.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Datuk Dr. Ahmad Kushairi Din, Director-General of MPOB for permission to publish the paper. Support and encouragement from Dr. Ahmad Parveez Ghulam Kadir, Deputy Director-General and Dr. Mohamad Arif Abd Manaf, Director of ABBC and technical assistance from the Tissue Culture staff are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Aziah MY (1989) Shoot formation in Calamus manan under in vitro. In: Rao AN, Aziah MY (eds) Proceedings of the seminar on tissue culture of forest species, June 15–18 1987. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 45–49Google Scholar
  2. Baudouin L, Durand-Gasselin T (1991) Genetic transmission of characters linked to oil yields in oil palm by cloning results for young palms (1). Oléagineux 49:313–320Google Scholar
  3. Boonsnongcheep PP, Korsangruang SS, Soonthornchareonnon NN, Chintapakorn Y, Saralamp P, Prathanturarugand PS (2010) Growth and isoflavonoid accumulation of Pueraria candollei var. candollei and P. candollei var. mirifica cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 101:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corley RHV, Gray BS (1976) Yield and yield components. In: Corley RHV, Hardon JJ, Wood BJ (eds) Oil Palm Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 77–86Google Scholar
  5. Corley RHV, Lee CH, Law IH, Wong CY (1986) Abnormal flower development in oil palm clones. The Planter Kuala Lumpur 62:233–240Google Scholar
  6. Duval Y, Durand-Gasselin T, Konan K, Pannetier C (1988) In vitro vegetative micropropagation of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) strategy and results. In: Proceedings of the 1987 international oil palm/palm oil conference—agriculture, June 23-July 1 1987, PORIM, Bangi, pp 191–198Google Scholar
  7. Eeuwens CJ, Blake J (1977) Culture of coconut and date palm tissue with a view to vegetative propagation. Acta Hort 78:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaligot E, Adler S, Debladis E, Beule T, Richaud F, Ilbert P, Finnegan EJ, Rival A (2011) Epigenetic imbalance and the floral developmental abnormality of the in vitro-regenerated oil palm Elaeis guineensis. Ann Bot 108:1453–1462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones LH (1974) Propagation of clonal palms by tissue culture. Oil Palm News. 17:1–8Google Scholar
  10. Kushairi A, Rajanaidu N (2000) Breeding populations, seed production and nursery management. In: Yusof B, Jalani BS, Chan KW (eds) Advances in oil palm research, vol 1. MPOB, Bangi. pp 39–96Google Scholar
  11. Kushairi A, Mohd Din A, Rajanaidu N (2011) Forging ahead with clones In: Wahid MB, Choo YM, Chan KW (eds) Further advances in oil palm research (2000–2010), vol 1. MPOB, pp 47–101Google Scholar
  12. Mohd Din A, Rajanaidu N, Kushairi A (2005) Exploitation of genetic variability in oil palm. IN: Proceedings MOSTA best practices workshops: agronomy and crops management, Malaysian Oil Sci Technol Assoc., March 27-August 14. Malaysia, pp 19–42Google Scholar
  13. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ong-Abdullah M, Rohani O, Zamzuri I, Tarmizi AH, Sharifah SA (2005) Handbook: photographic perspective on the anomalies of oil palm. Published by the Malaysian Palm Oil BoardGoogle Scholar
  15. Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Kok S-Y, Sarpan N, Azimi N, Hashim AT, Ishak Z, Rosli SK, Malike FA, Abu Bakar NZ, Marjuni M, Abdullah N, Yaakub Z, Amiruddin MD, Nookiah R, Singh R, Low E-TL, Chan K-L, Azizi N, Smith SW, Bacher B, Budiman MA, Van Brunt A, Wischmeyer C, Beil M, Hogan M, Lakey N, Lim C-C, Arulandoo X, Wong C-K, Choo C-N, Wong W-C, Kwan Y-Y, Syed Alwee SSR, Sambanthamurthi R, Martienssen RA (2015) Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525:533–537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Mokri A, Nookiah R, Singh R, Low E-TL, Sachdeva M, Smith SW, Lakey N, Sambanthamurthi R, Martienssen RA (2016a) Tissue culture and epigenetics. The Planter. Kuala Lumpur. 92:741–749Google Scholar
  17. Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Mokri A, Kok SY, Sarpan N, Azimi N, Hashim AT, Ishak Z, Rosli SK, Nookiah R, Singh R, Low E-TL, Sachdeva M, Smith SW, Lakey N, Martienssen RA, Sambanthamurthi R (2016b) SureSawitTM KARMA—a diagnostic assay for clonal conformity. MPOB Information Series No. 156, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Paranjothy K, Othman R (1982) In vitro propagation of oil palm. In: Fujiwara A (ed) proceedings of the fifth congress plant tissue and cell cult. July 11–16 1982, Maruzen, Tokyo. pp 747–748Google Scholar
  19. Preil W (2005) General introduction: a personal reflection on the use of liquid media for in vitro culture. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  20. Rabéchault H, Martin J-P (1976) Multiplication vegetative du palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) al’aide de cultures de tissus foliares. C.R Acad Sci Paris 283:1735–1737Google Scholar
  21. Rabechault H, Ahee J, Guenin G (1970) Colonies cellulaires et formes embryos in vitro á partir de cultures d’ embryons de palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Var. dura Becc.). C.R. Acad Sci Paris 270:3067–3070Google Scholar
  22. Rajanaidu N, Rohani O, Jalani S (1997) Oil Palm clones: current status and prospects for commercial production. Planter 73(853):163–184Google Scholar
  23. Rohani O (2001) Positional effect of leaf explant on callusing and embryogenesis in Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis). In: Proceedings of the 2001 PIPOC international palm oil congress—agriculture, MPOB, Bangi, pp 677–685Google Scholar
  24. Rohani O, Sharifah SA, Mohd Rafii Y, Ong M, Tarmizi AH, Zamzuri I (2000) Tissue culture of oil palm. In: Yusof B, Jalani BS, Chan KW (eds) Chapter 7, advances in oil palm research, vol 1. MPOB, Bangi. pp 238–283Google Scholar
  25. Sallets AA, Delimoy D, Boutry M (2015) Stable and transient transformation of Artemisia annua suspension cells. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 120:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith WK, Thomas JA (1973) The isolation and in vitro cultivation of cells of Elaeis guineensis. Oleagineux 28:123–127Google Scholar
  27. Sogeke AK (1998) Stages in the vegetative propagation of Oil Palm, Elaeis guineensis Jacq. through tissue culture. J Oil Palm Res 10(2):1–9Google Scholar
  28. Tarmizi AH (1997) Assessment of variability in tissue culture-derived buds of Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Ph.D. thesis. University of Liverpool, England, 234 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Tarmizi AH, Zaiton R (2007) Development of the MPOB Fast Transfer Technique (MoFaTT) for maintenance and maturation of oil palm culture aggregates. J Oil Palm Res. 19(2):435–439Google Scholar
  30. Tarmizi AH, Zaiton R, Rosli MY (2009) MPOB Motorized Vessel (MPOB-MotoVess) for liquid tissue culture system. MPOB Information Series TT No. 454Google Scholar
  31. Tarmizi AH, Zaiton R, Rosli MY (2016) Simple impeller system for maintenance of Oil Palm culture aggregates. J Oil Palm Res 1928(2):184–190Google Scholar
  32. Thanh-Tuyen NT, Apurillo DI (1992) Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis and cultured zygotic embryos of coconut. Pakistan J Contemp Sci 17(1):1–7Google Scholar
  33. Tisserat B, Foster G, de Mason D (1979) Plantlet production in vitro from Phoenix dactylifera L. Date Growers’ Institute Rep 54:19–23Google Scholar
  34. Wong G, Tan CC, Soh AC (1996) Large-scale propagation of oil palm clones - experience to date. Paper presented at the International symposium on in vitro culture and horticultural breeding, June 16-21 1996. Jerusalem, Israel. pp 649–658Google Scholar
  35. Xiao W, Huang X, Gong QDX, Zhao JT, Wei YR, Huang XL (2009) Somatic hybrids obtained by asymmetric protoplast fusion between Musa Silk cv. Guoshanxiang (AAB) and Musa acuminate cv. Mas (AA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 97:313–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zamzuri I (1998) Efficient rooting of Oil Palm in vitro plantlets using double-layer technique. PORIM Bulletin No. 36:23–36Google Scholar
  37. Zamzuri I (1999) Using double-layer technique in rooting of Oil Palm in vitro plantlets. In: Proceedings of the 1999 PORIM international palm oil congress-agriculture, February 1–6 1999. MPOB, Bangi. pp 223–229Google Scholar
  38. Zamzuri I (2004) Clonal trial report. Biology Division, MPOB. 26-3-2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad Tarmizi Hashim
    • 1
  • Zamzuri Ishak
    • 1
  • Samsul Kamal Rosli
    • 1
  • Meilina Ong-Abdullah
    • 1
  • Ooi Siew-Eng 
    • 1
  • Mohd Naqiuddin Husri
    • 1
  • Dalilah Abu Bakar
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Biotechnology and Breeding Center, Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB)Kajang, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations