Advertisement

Introduction

  • Mahnaz Sekechi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

Based on my psychosocial research results, this chapter sets out the central argument of the book, which suggest there are multilayered losses borne by middle-class professional Iranian migrants who left Iran after the Revolution of 1979, creating ‘brain drain’. Losses in Iran included loss of: country, plans/hopes for the future and secular ways of thinking and being. In London, there has been the gain of basic rights, but loss of economic, social, cultural and familial capital. For these migrants, there is the paradoxical situation of Iran being ‘there’ and desired, at the same time as being lost to them. The process of ‘mourning’ in the psychoanalytic sense remains ongoing and there is encapsulated sadness.

References

  1. Afshar, H. (1998). Islam and Feminisms: An Iranian Case Study. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar, S. (1995). A third individuation: Immigration, identity and the psychoanalytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 1051–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amati-Mehler, J. (2004). Immigration, loss and memory. In J. Szekacs-Weisz & I. Ward (Eds.), Lost Childhood and the Language of Exile. Norfolk: Biddles Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Aron, L. (2006). Analytical impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(2), 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axworthy, M. (2008). Iran, Empire of the Mind: A History from Zoroaster to the Present Day. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulanger, G. (2004). Lot’s wife, Cary Grant, and the American dream: Psychoanalysis with immigrants. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., et al. (1999). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, S., Hoggett, P., & Thompson, S. (2006). Emotions, Politics and Society. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elahi, B., & Karim, P. M. (2011). Introduction: Iranian diaspora. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 31(2), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). An Object Relations Theory of Personality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Frosh, S. (2012). Psychoanalysis after the turn. In S. Roseneil & S. Frosh (Eds.), Social Research After the Cultural Turn. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Grinberg, L., & Grinberg, R. (1984). A psychoanalytic study of migration: Its normal and pathological aspects. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 32(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunaratnam, Y. (2013a). Zubeidat Tsarnaeva and the Muslim mother as terrorist. The F-Word: Contemporary UK Feminism, May 10.Google Scholar
  16. Gunaratnam, Y. (2013b). Death and the Migrant: Bodies, Borders and Care. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  17. Harlem, A. (2010). Exile as a dissociative state: When a self is “lost in transit”. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 4, 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karp, D. A. (1997). Speaking of Sadness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keddie, N. (2006). Modern Iran, Roots and Results of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kleimberg, L. (2004). Cottage cheese, Swiss Cottage. In J. Szekacs & I. Ward (Eds.), Lost Childhood and the Language of Exile. London: Imago East West and Freud Museum.Google Scholar
  22. McAuliffe, C. (2007). Visible minorities: Constructing and deconstructing the “Muslim Iranian” diaspora. In C. Aitchison, P. Hopkins, & K. Mei-Po (Eds.), Geographies of Muslim Identities: Diaspora, Gender and Belonging. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Office for National Statistics. (2011). Census: Aggregate data (England and Wales) [computer file]. UK Data Service Consensus Support. Available at http://infuse.mimas.ac.uk. This information is licensed under the terms of the Open Government License. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-license/version/2. Accessed June 6, 2015.
  25. Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. The Psychoanalytic Quaterly, 73, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tierney, W. G. (2003). Undaunted courage: Life history and the postmodern challenge. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Wilkinson, I. (2005). Suffering: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wolpert, L. (2006). Malignant Sadness: The Anatomy of Depression (3rd ed.). London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahnaz Sekechi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial StudiesBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations