Advertisement

Cultural Competence and Sensitivity in Applied Psychology: Ethical and Scientific Problems

  • William O’DonohueEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

There have been significant problems in precisely defining cultural competence and cultural sensitivity in applied psychology. This chapter examines definitional issues related to this problem and suggests that these constructs rest, at least partially, on an ethical premise. This may account for the paucity of empirical evaluation as ethical claims (when viewed deontically or from the perspective of virtue ethics) may not be decided on empirical grounds. Although these constructs may have empirical dimensions, significant paradoxes and contradictions continue to exist.

Keywords

Cultural competence Cultural sensitivity Problems Ethics Definitions 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, E. G. (2001). Gangsta misogyny: A content analysis of the portrayals of violence against women in rap music, 1987–1993. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 8(2), 96–126.Google Scholar
  3. Benuto, L. T., Casas, J., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2018). Training culturally competent psychologists: A systematic review of the training outcome literature. Training and Education in Professional Psychology.Google Scholar
  4. Cummings, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Cummings, J. (Eds.). (2009). Psychology’s war on religion. Phoenix, AZ: Zweig, Tucker & Thiess.Google Scholar
  5. Frisby, C. (2013). Meeting the psych educational needs of minority students. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalez, O. R. (2010). Tracking the bug chaser: Giving the gift of HIV/AIDS. Cultural Critique, 75, 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. New York: HackettGoogle Scholar
  8. Lauran, L. (1978). Progress and its problems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. McKinnon, C. (1987). Pleasure under patriarch. In: J. Geer & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. MacKinnon, C. (1987). Pleasure under patriarchy. In J. H. Geer & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  11. O’Donohue, W., & Levensky, E. (1992). Handbook of forensic psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. O’Donohue, W. (2016). Oppression, privilege, bias, prejudice, & stereotyping: Problems in the APA Code of Ethics. Ethics and Behavior, 26(7), 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Donohue, W., & Benuto, L. (2010). The many problems of cultural sensitivity. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 7(2), 34–37.Google Scholar
  14. Paul, G. L. (1969). Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In: C. M. Franks (Ed.), Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 29–62). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Sowell, T. (1996). The vision of the anointed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Sue, D. et al (2007). Racial microagressions in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zaitchik, M. C., & Mosher, D. L. (1993). Criminal justice implications of the macho personality constellation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Nevada - RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations