Advertisement

Diagnostic Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Endocrinology

  • Kosma Wolinski
Chapter

Abstract

The meta-analyses of diagnostic tests play an important role in the field of endocrinology. Decision-making and interpretation of clinical findings should always be based on the best available evidence. Common differences between the guidelines elaborated by different societies as well as differences between the results of particular studies can be a source of confusion for clinician. Also great improvement in imaging technique appearance of new diagnostic methods and modalities (e.g., numerous types of elastography) entail the need for appropriate assessment of the diagnostic value of particular methods. Meta-analysis constitutes important tool allowing for the quantitative synthesis of the results of particular studies.

The current chapter presents two case studies concerning the differential diagnostics of benign and malignant thyroid lesions. The risk of malignancy is assessed to be about 5%, so relatively small, however noticeable. Differentiation between the lesions being at high risk of malignancy needing surgical treatment and benign ones is crucial. Case study 1 compares effectiveness of different types of biopsy in the diagnostics and case study 2 on usefulness of different ultrasound features of malignancy in predicting the type of thyroid lesions.

Keywords

Thyroid Thyroid lesions Fine-needle biopsy Core-needle biopsy Ultrasonography Elastography 

References

  1. 1.
    Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:226–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolinski K, Stangierski A, Ruchala M. Comparison of diagnostic yield of core-needle and fine-needle aspiration biopsies of thyroid lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:431–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cibas ES, Ali SZ, NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132:658–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baier ND, Hahn PF, Gervais DA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: experience in a cohort of 944 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1175–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhong LC, Lu F, Ma F, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: does the size limit its efficiency? Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:3155–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seningen JL, Nassar A, Henry MR. Correlation of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology with corresponding histology at Mayo Clinic, 2001–2007: an institutional experience of 1,945 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40:E27–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stangierski A, Wolinski K, Martin K, Leitgeber O, Ruchala M. Core needle biopsy of thyroid nodules—evaluation of diagnostic utility and pain experience. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34:798–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woliński K, Stangierski A, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Gurgul E, Wrotkowska E, Biczysko M, Ruchała M. Content of RNA originating from thyroid in washouts from fine-needle and core-needle aspiration biopsy—preliminary study. Endokrynol Pol. 2016;67:550–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Renshaw AA, Pinnar N. Comparison of thyroid fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:370–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen BT, Jain AB, Dagis A, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration for evaluating thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:128–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi SH, Baek JH, Lee JH, et al. Thyroid nodules with initially non-diagnostic, fine-needle aspiration results: comparison of core-needle biopsy and repeated fine-needle aspiration. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2819–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee SH, Kim MH, Bae JS, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with non-diagnostic thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology: usefulness of the thyroid core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1870–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Na DG, Kim JH, Sung JY, et al. Core-needle biopsy is more useful than repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules read as nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2012;22:468–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Samir AE, Vij A, Seale MK, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thyroid nodule core biopsy: clinical utility in patients with prior nondiagnostic fine-needle aspirate. Thyroid. 2012;22:461–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sung JY, Na DG, Kim KS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration versus core-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy in a clinical cohort. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1564–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park KT, Ahn SH, Mo JH, et al. Role of core needle biopsy and ultrasonographic finding in management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Head Neck. 2011;33:160–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strauss EB, Iovino A, Upender S. Simultaneous fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy of thyroid nodules and other superficial head and neck masses using sonographic guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1697–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karstrup S, Balslev E, Juul N, Eskildsen PC, Baumbach L. US-guided fine needle aspiration versus coarse needle biopsy of thyroid nodules. Eur J Ultrasound. 2001;13:1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woliński K, Szkudlarek M, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Ruchała M. Usefulness of different ultrasound features of malignancy in predicting the type of thyroid lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2014;124:97–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pasqualetti G, Caraccio N, Basolo F, Miccoli P, Monzani F. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in multinodular goiter versus single nodule: iodine intake and cancer phenotypes. Thyroid. 2014;24:604–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woliński K, Szczepanek-Parulska E, Stangierski A, Gurgul E, Rewaj-Łosyk M, Ruchała M. How to select nodules for fine-needle aspiration biopsy in multinodular goitre. Role of conventional ultrasonography and shear wave elastography—a preliminary study. Endokrynol Pol. 2014;65:114–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Szczepanek-Parulska E, Woliński K, Stangierski A, Gurgul E, Biczysko M, Majewski P, Rewaj-Łosyk M, Ruchała M. Comparison of diagnostic value of conventional ultrasonography and shear wave elastography in the prediction of thyroid lesions malignancy. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ruchała M, Szczepanek E. Thyroid ultrasound—a piece of cake? Endokrynol Pol. 2010;61:330–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gietka-Czernel M, Kochman M, Bujalska K, et al. Real-time ultrasound elastography—a new tool for diagnosing thyroid nodules. Endokrynol Pol. 2010;61:652–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A, et al. US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2008;18:523–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brito JP, Gionfriddo MR, Al Nofal A, Boehmer KR, Leppin AL, Reading C, Callstrom M, Elraiyah TA, Prokop LJ, Stan MN, Murad MH, Morris JC, Montori VM. The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:1253–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salmaslioğlu A, Erbil Y, Dural C, Işsever H, Kapran Y, Ozarmağan S, Tezelman S. Predictive value of sonographic features in preoperative evaluation of malignant thyroid nodules in a multinodular goiter. World J Surg. 2008;32:1948–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P. Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2917–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Azizi G, Keller J, Lewis Pa M, et al. Performance of elastography for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: a prospective study. Thyroid. 2013;23:734–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bojunga J, Dauth N, Berner C, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for differentiation of thyroid nodules. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rossi M, Buratto M, Bruni S, et al. Role of ultrasonographic/clinical profile, cytology, and BRAF V600E mutation evaluation in thyroid nodule screening for malignancy: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2354–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trimboli P, Guglielmi R, Monti S, et al. Ultrasound sensitivity for thyroid malignancy is increased by real-time elastography: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:4524–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhatia KS, Rasalkar DP, Lee YP, et al. Cystic change in thyroid nodules: a confounding factor for real-time qualitative thyroid ultrasound elastography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:799–807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Merino S, Arrazola J, Cárdenas A, et al. Utility and interobserver agreement of ultrasound elastography in the detection of malignant thyroid nodules in clinical care. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:2142–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Unlütürk U, Erdoğan MF, Demir O, et al. Ultrasound elastography is not superior to grayscale ultrasound in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2012;22:1031–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    D’Souza MM, Marwaha RK, Sharma R, et al. Prospective evaluation of solitary thyroid nodule on 18F-FDG PET/CT and high-resolution ultrasonography. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:345–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Friedrich-Rust M, Sperber A, Holzer K, et al. Real-time elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118:602–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yunus M, Ahmed Z. Significance of ultrasound features in predicting malignant solid thyroid nodules: need for fine-needle aspiration. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60:848–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brunese L, Romeo A, Iorio S, et al. A new marker for diagnosis of thyroid papillary cancer: B-flow twinkling sign. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1187–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography. Ultraschall Med. 2009;30:175–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kosma Wolinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal MedicinePoznan University of Medical SciencesPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations