Transition to Intervention Meta-Analysis

  • Umberto Benedetto
  • Colin Ng


Among the many uses of meta-analyses, it has become an increasingly relevant tool in the assessment of intervention for diseases. This chapter aims to outline the key points in conducting an intervention meta-analysis and explains how to make sense of the results of meta-analyses in understanding the effects of intervention.


Intervention Meta-analysis Trials Control Randomized Clinical Evidence-based 


  1. 1.
    Scott A, Wolchok J, Old L. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:278–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohiuddin K, Swanson S. Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:315–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abbott R, Cohen M. Medico-legal issues in cardiology. Cardiol Rev. 2013;21:222–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Accessed 29 June 2018.
  5. 5.
    Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L, Ahmad N, Aim F, Nizard R, Ravaud P. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2014;259:18–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sedgwick P. Odds and odds ratios. BMJ. 2013;347:f5067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umberto Benedetto
    • 1
  • Colin Ng
    • 2
  1. 1.Bristol Heart InstituteUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Singapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations