Comparison Between Non-linear Numerical Models for R.C. Shear Walls Under Cyclic Loading

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 10)

Abstract

The non-linear behaviour of concrete structures is the result of a series of phenomena, as material non-linear constitutive law and cracking process. As a consequence, in order to understand the behaviour of reinforced concrete members from elastic field to ultimate condition, is necessary to use instruments able to simulate the material damaging evolution under growing loads. Commercial non-linear finite elements codes are generally able to simulate concrete behaviour with good approximation when a progressive incremental load is applied. However, the same result could not be reached under a cyclic loading. In this work two commercial non-linear finite element codes have been considered in order to assess the skill of these codes to simulate non-linear concrete behaviour under cyclic loading. The results of six laboratory tests on shear walls have been compared with the ones obtained by means of numerical models and some conclusions on the numerical predictions are presented.

Keywords

Reinforced concrete Non-linear Finite elements Cyclic loading Shear walls 

References

  1. Pilakoutas K, Elnashai A (1995) Cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete cantilever walls, part I: experimental results. ACI Struct J 92(3):271–281. Technical paper, Title No. 92-S25Google Scholar
  2. Lefas ID, Kotsovos MD (1990) Strength and deformations characteristics of reinforced concrete walls under load reversals. ACI Struct J 87(6):716–726. Technical paper, Title No. 87-S74Google Scholar
  3. Bertagnoli G, La Mazza D, Mancini G (2015) Effect of concrete tensile strength in non linear analyses of 2D structures - a comparison between three commercial finite element softwaresGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertagnoli G, Mancini G, Recupero A, Spinella N (2011) Rotating compression fields for reinforced concrete beams under prevalent shear actions. Struct Concr 12(3):178–186Google Scholar
  5. CEB-FIP Model Code (1990) First Draft. Committee Euro-International du Beton, Bulletin d’information No. 195, 196Google Scholar
  6. Eurocode 2, EN 1992-1-1 (2004) Design of concrete structures – part 1: general rules and rules for buildingsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Mancini
    • 1
  • G. Bertagnoli
    • 1
  • D. La Mazza
    • 1
  • D. Gino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Buildings, Structural and Geotechnical EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations