Reforming Theatrical Education from Its Extrovert-Based Model

  • Rob RoznowskiEmail author
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 2)


Through an examination of introversion in relation to theatrical teaching methods, educators may begin to augment their current practices to create a more inclusive creative classroom. Traditional and accepted methods of theatrical education (specifically actor training) rely on principles and constructs that favor extroverted students in their design. The current training practices ask introverted students to perform in extroverted ways that may actually have the opposite intended effect on the student. Offering strategies to transform the standard theatrical models of improvisation and ensemble-building to include introverted students will allow educators to create an equitable actor-training experience that respects all types of learning. With expert interviews (including Susan Cain’s “Quiet Schools” program education director, Dr. Heidi Kasevich), instructors are offered tactics to transform accepted, extrovert-based models of theatre-making in order to create a more balanced classroom. These strategies extend beyond theatre and actor training to include ways to augment any classroom devoted to parity in fostering creativity.


Acting Improvisation Ensemble-building Introvert Extrovert Pedagogy 


  1. Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  2. Cain, S. (2017). Quiet schools network. Quiet revolution. Retrieved from Accessed 06 May 2017.
  3. Capobianco, R. M. (1988). In the beginning: Jung and Freud on introversion. Psychological Perspectives, 20(2), 244–255.Google Scholar
  4. Cocu, A., Pecheanu, E., & Susnea, I. (2015). Stimulating creativity through collaboration in an innovation laboratory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  6. French, K. A., & Kottke, J. L. (2013). Teamwork satisfaction: Exploring the multilevel interaction of teamwork interest and group extraversion. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Godsey, M. (2015, September 28). When schools overlook introverts. The Atlantic. Accessed 06 May 2017.
  8. Jung, C. (1923). Psychological types, or, the psychology of individuation (H. G. Baynes, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Laney, M. O. (2005). The hidden gifts of the introverted child. New York: Workman Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence, G. (1991). People types and tiger stripes: A practical guide to learning styles (2nd ed.). Gainesville: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.Google Scholar
  11. Pappas, A. (n.d.). Alex Pappas. Quiet Revolution. Accessed 06 May 2017.
  12. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schultz, K. (2009). Rethinking classroom participation: Listening to silent voices. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, L. (2015, February 25). The introverted teaching artist: (Quietly) celebrating all learning personalities. TYA Today Online. Accessed 6 May 2017.
  15. Spolin, V. (1963). Improvisation for the theatre: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Thompson, S. (2012, January/February). Introvert? Extrovert? Tips for a balanced classroom. Canadian Teacher Magazine. http://canadianteacher.archives. Accessed 06 May 2017.
  17. Walter, D. (2016). Why we need to make space for quiet teachers. In Quiet Revolution. Accessed 06 May 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations