The Improv Paradigm: Three Principles that Spur Creativity in the Classroom
Improvised scenes work when improvisers listen to their scene partners and agree and add onto each other’s ideas without judgment. These three principles derived from improvisation—listening, agreeing, and not judging—come together to form the improv paradigm, which can be used to modify pedagogy in order to improve student outcomes. Teachers can introduce activities that specifically target how students listen, agree, and judge each other. The principles of the improv paradigm can also be used to reflect on and improve how teachers teach. Colleagues and supervisors can focus on how teachers consciously or unconsciously listen to their students, agree or disagree with their ideas, and judge students’ responses in order to adjust moment-to-moment teacher behavior to create a more creative learning environment. Once improved, these skills lead to more trusting, collaborative, and creative classrooms that foster creative ideation instead of causing students to feel shamed or judged and therefore stop contributing and creating.
KeywordsImprov Listening Improv paradigm Yes and Agreeing Creativity Improvisation Improvisation in the classroom Teacher evaluation Nonjudgment Creative mortification Impro Mindfulness Brainstorming
- Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly?: The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Danielson, C. (2011). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.Google Scholar
- Danielson, C. (2016, April 8). Charlotte Danielson on rethinking teacher evaluation. Education Week, 35(28), 20–24.Google Scholar
- DeMichele, M. (2015). Improv and ink: Increasing individual writing fluency with collaborative improv. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(10). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v16n10/.
- Hanh, T. N., & Weare, K. (2017). Happy teachers change the world. Berkley: Parallax Publishing.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Johnstone, K. (2011, September). Interkunst workshop. Berlin: English Theatre.Google Scholar
- Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., Rizik-Baer, D. A., & Braun, A. R. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00834.
- Spolin, V. (1983). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
- The Hawn Foundation. (2011). The mindUP curriculum: Brain-focused strategies for learning—And living. New York: Scholastic Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
- Veenstra, E. W. (2009). Improvisational theater and psychotherapy: A new model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azusa: Azusa Pacific University.Google Scholar
- White, M. C. (2013, November 10). The real reason new college grads can’t get hired. Time Business. Retrieved from http://business.time.com/2013/11/10/the-real-reason-new-college-grads-cant-get-hired/