Advertisement

The Actor’s Real Role on the Production Team

  • Tony Noice
  • Helga Noice
Chapter
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 2)

Abstract

The primary purpose of this chapter is to show how the actor’s job of bringing the scripted events of a drama to vibrant life onstage is necessarily a creative endeavor. A detailed analysis of the acting process will reveal that, from the first reading to the final public performance, an actor must create the “live” aspect of the play in terms of amplifying and communicating the deep meaning he or she finds behind the literal words. This communication is accomplished by the actor’s emotional conviction, vocal inflection, body language, and all other channels of communication. The training methods used in higher education, designed to produce this ability, are herein described along with some methodological variations. A secondary purpose of this chapter is to review some theories of creativity offered by a number of prominent researchers and to show how precisely these theories can be applied to the main elements of the acting process.

Keywords

Acting Creativity Memory Stanislavski Embodiment Spontaneity Flow 

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, R. (2009). Acting: Onstage and off (5th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  3. Beghetto, R. (2017). Creativity in teaching. In J. Kaufman, V. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 549–564). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Theories of creativity. In J. A. Plucke (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Current understandings and debates. Waco: Prufrock.Google Scholar
  5. Benedetti, R. (2015). The actor in you. New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1995). The magic of theatre. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Bruder, M., Cohn, L. M., Olneck, M., Pollack, N., Previto, R., & Zigler, S. (1986). A practical handbook for the actor. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  8. Caine, M. (1990). Acting in film: An actor's take on movie making. New York: Applause Theatre Books.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, R. (1978). Acting power. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, W.W. (1924/2011). Plotto. Portland: Tin House Books.Google Scholar
  11. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2006). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  12. Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forgeard, M. J. C., & Mecklenburg, A. C. (2013). The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon, M. (1987). The Stanislavsky technique: Russia. New York: Applause Theatre Book Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 20–47). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghtto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meisner, S., & Longwell, D. (1987). Sanford Meisner on acting. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Noice, H., & Noice, T. (1994). Analyzing the role preparation of a professional actor. Discourse Processes, 18, 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Noice, H., & Noice, T. (1996). Two approaches to learning a theatrical script. Memory, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noice, T., & Noice, H. (2002). A review of recent research on the expertise of professional actors. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noice, T., & Noice, H. (2004). A cognitive learning principle derived from the role acquisition strategies of professional actors. Cognitive Technology, 9(1), 34–39.Google Scholar
  24. Noice, T., & Noice, H. (2006). A theatrical intervention to improve cognition in intact residents of long term care facilities. Clinical Gerontologist Journal, 29(3), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noice, H., & Noice, T. (2009). An arts intervention for older adults living in subsidized retirement homes. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
  26. Noice, H., & Noice, T. (2013). Extending the reach of an evidence-based theatrical intervention. Experimental Aging Research, 39(4), 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pfeiffer, F. M., Bauer, R. E., Borgelt, S., Burgoyne, S., Grant, S., Hunt, H. K., Pardoe, J. J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2017). When theater comes to engineering design: Oh how creative they can be. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 139(07), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Platt, J., & Spivack, G. (1975). The MEPS procedure manual. In Community Mental Health/Mental Retardation Center. Philadelphia: Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital.Google Scholar
  29. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Educational Psychology, 39, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sawyer, K. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. The Creativity Research Journal, 73(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stanislavski, K. (1924). My life in art (J. J. Robbins, Trans.). New York: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  32. Stanislavski, K. (2008). An actor’s work: A student’s diary (J. Benedetti, Ed., Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Pasadena: Solis Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TheatreElmhurst CollegeElmhurstUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyElmhurst CollegeElmhurstUSA

Personalised recommendations