Advertisement

Feminist Continua in Peace and Conflict Studies

  • Amanda E. Donahoe
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter defines and then engages a feminist lens to explore gender within peace and conflict studies. The heuristic of a continuum, a series of elements that share a basic character, is used to critique the use of dichotomies such as male/female, peace/war, strong/weak, active/passive, and public/private. Looking at these concepts as continua rather than in binary form allows for more critical understanding of the complexities of peace and violence, power and participation, and challenges the hierarchy implicit in these dichotomies.

References

  1. Addams, J. (1907). Newer Ideals of Peace. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Aharoni, S. B. (2016). Who Needs the Women and Peace Hypothesis? Rethinking Modes of Inquiry on Gender and Conflict in Israel/Palestine. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(3), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderlini, S. N. (2007). Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why It Matters. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  4. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing Feminism: Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristophanes. (1992). Lysistrata (M. Neuberg, Ed.). Arlington Heights, IL: Crofts Classics.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, K. (2001). Foreword. In Y. Y. Haddad & J. L. Esposito (Eds.), Daughters of Abraham: Feminist Thought in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  7. Bacani, S., & Ferrer, M. C. (2014). Developing Challenges in Achieving Fiscal Autonomy in the Bangsamoro. Development, 57(1), 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badran, M. (2009). Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Bailey, A. (1994). Mothering, Diversity and Peace Politics. Hypatia, 9(2), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banerjee, S. (2003). Gender and Nationalism: The Masculinization of Hinduism and Female Political Participation in India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(2), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, C., & O’Rourke, C. (2010). Peace Agreements or Pieces of Paper? The Impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on Peace Processes and Their Agreements. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(4), 941–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boden, A. L. (2007). Women’s Rights and Religious Practice: Claims in Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulding, E. (1988). Warriors and Saints: Dilemmas in the History of Men, Women and War. In E. Isaksson (Ed.), Women and the Military System. London: Harvester Wheatsheef.Google Scholar
  14. Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of Peace: The Hidden Side of History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burguieres, M. K. (1990). Feminist Approaches to Peace: Another Step for Peace Studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, B. A. (1972). Peace Research: The Cult of Power. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16(4), 585–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, T. F. (1983). Women, Religion and Development in the Third World. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  18. CFR. (2018). Women’s Participation in Peace Processes. Retrieved from: https://www.cfr.org/interactive/womens-participation-in-peace-processes.
  19. Chinkin, C. (2002). Cultural Relativism and International Law. In C. W. Howland (Ed.), Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Chinkin, C. (2012). Bringing Women in from the Margins. Paper Presented at the Hanna’s House All-Ireland “Women Delivering Peace and Security” Conference on UNSCR 1325, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  21. Cockburn, C. (2011). Snagged on the Contradiction: NATO, UNSC Resolution 1325, and Feminist Responses. Retrieved from: http://www.cynthiacockburn.org/BlogNATO1325.pdf.
  22. Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs, 12(4), 687–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohn, C. (1993). Wars, Wimps and Women: Talking Gender and Thinking War. In M. Cooke & A. Woollacott (Eds.), Gendering War Talk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cohn, C. (2013). Women and Wars: Toward a Conceptual Framework. In C. Cohn (Ed.), Women & Wars. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  25. Cohn, C. (2018). The Perils of Mixing Masculinity and Missiles. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/security-masculinity-nuclear-weapons.html?smid=tw-share.
  26. Cohn, C., Kinsella, H., & Gibbings, S. (2004). Women, Peace and Security Resolution 1325. International Journal of Feminist Politics, 6(1), 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Collins, P. H. (1991). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Collins, P. H. (1994). Shifting the Center: Race, Class and Feminist Theorizing About Motherhood. In D. Bassin, M. Honey, & M. M. Kaplan (Eds.), Representations of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s Definitional Dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Confortini, C. C. (2006). Galtung, Violence, and Gender: The Case for a Peace Studies/Feminism Alliance. Peace & Change, 31(3), 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Confortini, C. C. (2012). Intelligent Compassion: Feminist Critical Methodology in the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Coomaraswamy, R., & Fonseka, D. (2004). Introduction. In R. Coomaraswamy & D. Fonseka (Eds.), Peace Work: Women, Armed Conflict and Negotiation. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.Google Scholar
  34. Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Revier, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Donahoe, A. E. (2017a). Gender, Religion and International Relations. In R. A. Denemark & R. Marlin-Bennett (Eds.), The International Studies Encyclopedia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Donahoe, A. E. (2017b). Peacebuilding Through Women’s Community Development: Wee Women’s Work in Northern Ireland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Duncanson, C. (2016). Gender and Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. El-Bushra, J. (2000). Transforming Conflict: Some Thoughts on a Gendered Understanding of Conflict Processes. In S. Jacobs, R. Jacobsen, & J. Marchbank (Eds.), States of Conflict: Gender, Violence and Resistance. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  41. Elshtain, J. B. (1987). Women and War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Elshtain, J. B. (1992). The Power and Powerlessness of Women. In G. Bock & S. James (Eds.), Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Enloe, C. (2004a). The Continuum of Violence: A Gender Perspective on War and Peace. In W. Giles & J. Hyndman (Eds.), Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Enloe, C. (2004b). The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Enloe, C. (2016). Afterword: Being Reflexively Feminist Shouldn’t Be Easy. In A. T. R. Wibben (Ed.), Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gentry, C. E., & Sjoberg, L. (2015). Beyond Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Thinking About Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Gibbings, S. L. (2011). No Angry Women at the United Nations: Political Dreams and the Cultural Politics of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(4), 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gleditsch, N. P., Nordkvelle, J., & Strand, H. (2014). Peace Research—Just the Study of War? Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Goeman, M. R., & Denetdale, J. N. (2009). Guest Editor’s Introduction. Wicazo Sa Review, 24(2), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Haddad, Y. Y., & Esposito, J. L. (2001). Daughters of Abraham: Feminist Thought in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  56. Harding, S. (1986). The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory. Signs, 11(4), 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hauptman, J. (1998). Rereading the Rabbis: A Woman’s Voice. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hu, H.-L. (2011). This Worldly-Nibbana: A Buddhist-Feminist Social Ethic for Peacemaking in the Global Community. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  59. Katz, J. (Producer). (2013). Violence Against Women–It’s a Men’s Issue. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTvSfeCRxe8.
  60. Kelly, L. (1987). The Continuum of Sexual Violence. In J. Hanmer & M. Maynard (Eds.), Women, Violence and Social Control. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International Inc.Google Scholar
  61. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  62. Killermann, S. (2017). A Guide to Gender (2nd Edition): The Social Justice Advocate’s Handbook. Austin, TX: Impetus Books.Google Scholar
  63. Klein, A. C. (2008). Meeting the Great Bliss Queen: Buddhists, Feminists, and the Art of the Self. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. MacKenzie, M. (2015). Beyond the Ban of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth That Women Can’t Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mazurana, D. E., McKay, S., Carlson, K. C., & Kasper, J. C. (2009). Girls in Fighting Forces and Groups: Their Recruitment, Participation, Demobilization, and Reintegration. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 8(2), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mernissi, F. (1991). The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam (M. J. Lakeland, Trans.). New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  68. Moghadam, V. (2002). Islamic Feminism and Its Discontents: Toward a Resolution of the Debate. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(4), 1135–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morgenthau, H. (1967). Politics Among Nations (4th ed.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  70. Morin, K. M., & Guelke, J. K. (Eds.). (2007). Women, Religion and Space: Global Perspective on Gender and Faith. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Moser, C. O. N. (2001). The Gendered Continuum of Violence and Conflict. In C. O. N. Moser & F. C. Clark (Eds.), Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  72. Moser, C. O. N., & Clark, F. C. (2001). Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict, and Political Violence. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  73. Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Rourke, C. (2014). ‘Walk[ing] the Halls of Power’? Understanding Women’s Participation in International Peace and Security. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 15(1), 128–154.Google Scholar
  75. PeaceWomen. (2018). The Resolutions. Retrieved from: http://www.peacewomen.org/why-WPS/solutions/resolutions.
  76. Peach, L. J. (2002). Women and World Religions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  77. Phillips, A. (1998). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pratt, N., & Richter-Devroe, S. (2011). Critically Examining UNSCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security. International Journal of Feminist Politics, 13(4), 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ramee, B. (2013). Did Buddhism Elevate the Status of Women? Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 167.Google Scholar
  80. Reardon, B. A. (1993). Women and Peace: Feminist Visions of Global Security. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  81. Robinson, F. (2006). Methods of Feminist Normative Theory: A Political Ethic of Care for International Relations. In B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ruddick, S. (2002). Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  84. Sharma, A. (2002). Women in Indian Religions. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Shields, P. M., & Soeters, J. (2017). Peaceweaving: Jane Addams, Positive Peace, and Public Administration. American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smith, A. (2008). Native Americans and the ChristianRight: The Gendered Politics of Unlikely Alliances. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smith, A. (2011). Indigenous Feminism Without Apology. Retrieved from: https://unsettlingamerica.wordpress.com/2011/09/08/indigenous-feminism-without-apology/.
  88. Smith, A., & Kauanui, J. K. (2008). Native Feminisms Engage American Studies. American Quarterly, 60(2), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the Subaltern Speak. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader. Herfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  90. Sylvester, C. (2002). Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Turshen, M., & Twagiramariya, C. (1998). What Women Do in Wartime: Gender and Conflict in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  93. UN Women. (2012). Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Connections Between Presence and Influence. Retrieved from: http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2012/10/wpssourcebook-03a-womenpeacenegotiations-en.pdf?la=en&vs=1159.
  94. USIP (United States Institute of Peace). (2013). What Is UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and Why Is It So Critical Today? Retrieved from: http://www.usip.org/gender_peacebuilding/about_UNSCR_1325#Why_did_the_UN_Security_Council_pass_Resolution_1325_.
  95. Vaittinen, T. (2017). The Global Biopolitical Economy of Needs: Transnational Entanglements Between Ageing Finald and the Global Nurse Reserve of the Philippines. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Väyrynen, T. (2010). Gender and Peacebuilding. In O. P. Richmond (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  97. Wibben, A. T. R. (2016). Introduction: Feminists Study War. In A. T. R. Wibben (Ed.), Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. WILPF (Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom). (2015). Gender, Economic, Social and Ecological Justice for Sustainable Development A Feminist Declaration for Post 2015. Retrieved from: https://wilpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Feminists-Post-2015-Declaration.pdf.
  99. Wood, H. (2018). Current Debated in Peace and Conflict Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Yuval-Davis, N. (2001). The Personal Is Political: Jewish Fundamentalism and Women’s Empowerment. In C. W. Howland (Ed.), Religious Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  101. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda E. Donahoe
    • 1
  1. 1.Centenary College of LouisianaShreveportUSA

Personalised recommendations