International Norms and Future Peacebuilding

  • Alistair D. EdgarEmail author


This chapter explores the changing international norms and practices of peacebuilding as an expression of international intervention in fragile, failed, or postconflict states and societies. It briefly reviews the discussion of norms in the scholarship of IR theory, and then considers peacebuilding at the level of global governance—in the practices of the UN and in the critiques of peacebuilding as a neoliberal statebuilding project. The analysis addresses how these norms and related practices have taken shape at the operational level of peacebuilding, in international policy choices and practices; in particular, the proposal, dissemination and negotiation of the R2P as a new doctrine that (arguably) has become accepted as an international norm.


  1. Besada, H. (Ed.). (2009). From Civil Strife to Peace Building: Examining Private Sector Involvement in West African Reconstruction. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cahill, K. M. (Ed.). (2004). Human Security for All. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Donais, T., & McCandless, E. (2016). International Peace Building and the Emerging Inclusivity Norm. Third World Quarterly, 38(2), 291–310. Scholar
  4. Doyle, M. W. (2011). Liberal Peace: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doyle, M., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Firchow, P., & Anastasiou, H. (Eds.). (2016). Practical Approaches to Peacebuilding: Putting Theory to Work. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  8. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2018). UN Security Council Resolutions and Presidential Statements Referencing R2P. Retrieved from:
  10. Goetz, C. (2017). The Distinction of Peace: A Social Analysis of Peacebuilding. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayner, P. (2018). The Peacemaker’s Paradox: Pursuing Justice in the Shadow of Conflict. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higashi, D. (2015). Challenges of Constructing Legitimacy in Peacebuilding: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sierra Leone, and East Timor. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ICISS. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  14. Ilitchev, A. (2015, December). Implementing the HIPPO Report: Sustaining Peace as a New Imperative? (Policy Brief 5). International Forum for the Challenges of Peace Operations.Google Scholar
  15. Lopez, G. (2015). Responsibility to Protect at a Crossroads: The Crisis in Libya. Transatlantic Perspectives on Diplomacy and Diversity. Humanity in Action Press. Retrieved from:
  16. MacFarlane, S. N., & Khong, Y. F. (2006). Human Security and the UN: A Critical History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Millar, G. (2014). An Ethnographic Approach to Peacebuilding: Understanding Local Experiences in Transitional States. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Newman, E., Paris, R., & Richmond, O. P. (Eds.). (2009). New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Peacebuilding Support Office. (2010, September). UN Peacebuilding: An Orientation. Retrieved from:
  20. Thakur, R. (2015). R2P’s “Structural” Problems: A Response to Roland Paris. International Peacekeeping, 22(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O., & Brockmeier, S. (2015). Responsibility While Protecting: Reforming R2P Implementation. Global Society, 30(1), 134–150. Retrieved from: Scholar
  22. United Nations. (1992). An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping. Report of the Secretary-General. Retrieved from:
  23. Vinjamuri, L. (2016). The International Criminal Court and the Paradox of Authority. Law and Contemporary Problems, 70(1), 275–287.Google Scholar
  24. Weiss, T. G. (2007). Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  25. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wilfrid UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations