Advertisement

The UN Security Council and Responsibility to Protect as Global Approach to Prevent Mass Atrocities

  • Vesselin PopovskiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The Security Council is the most powerful international organ dealing with international peace, whereas R2P is a global approach to prevent or respond to mass atrocities. The chapter examines how the norm R2P has originated, developed and gathered global acceptance, distancing itself from the problematic “humanitarian intervention”, and also how the Security Council has shown unsatisfactory record to exercise R2P and protect people at risk. The R2P is a global norm, however, the composition of the Security Council is far from global, and there is an urgent need to reform the Security Council to make it globally representative. The chapter further discusses the model for Security Council reform 8 + 8 + 8, proposed by the author, and elaborates how this model can satisfy all regional groups and member-states.

References

  1. Annan, K. (1999, September 16–22). Two Concepts of Sovereignty. The Economist. Retrieved from: http://www.economist.com/node/324795.
  2. Annan, K. (2005). In Larger Freedom: Towards Peace, Development and Human Rights for All. Retrieved from: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/13545_13545A592005SGReportInLargerFreedom.pdf.
  3. Ayoob, M. (2002). Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Journal of Human Rights, 6(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoob, M. (2004). Third World Perspectives on Humanitarian Intervention and International Administration. Global Governance, 10(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
  5. Ban, K.-M. (2009, January 12). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Report of the Secretary-General. The General Assembly Sixty-Third Session, A/63/677. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/SG_reportA_63_677_en.pdf.
  6. Bannon, A. (2006). The Responsibility to Protect: The U.N. World Summit and the Question of Unilateralism. The Yale Law Journal, 115(5), 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellamy, A. (2008). R2P and the Problem of Military Intervention. International Affairs, 84(4), 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellamy, A. (2009). Responsibility to Protect: Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Bellamy, A. (2014). Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler, D. (2015). The R2P Is Dead, Long Live the R2P: The Successful Separation of Military Intervention from the Responsibility to Protect. International Peacekeeping, 22(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Constitutive Act of the African Union. (2000). Retrieved from: https://au.int/sites/default/files/pages/32020-file-constitutiveact_en.pdf.
  12. Cunliffe, P. (Ed.). (2011). Critical Perspectives on the Responsibility to Protect: Interrogating Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Deng, F., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D., & Zartman, W. (1996). Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, G. (2008a). Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fiott, D., & Koops, J. (Eds.). (2014). The Responsibility to Protect and the Third Pillar: Legitimacy and Operationalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Forji, G. A. (2007). Adieu, Kofi Annan: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of the Outgoing U.N. Secretary-General. Ohmy News—International Global Watch. Retrieved from: http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=337702&rel_no=1.
  17. Hehir, A. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect: ‘Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing’? International Relations, 24(2), 218–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holzgrefe, J. L., & Keohane, R. O. (2003). Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Human Rights Watch. (1999). Numbers: Averaging Estimates from Researchers. Retrieved from: https://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/rwanda/Geno1-3-04.htm.
  20. International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  21. Kemp, W., Popovski, V., & Thakur, R. (Eds.). (2011). Blood and Borders: The Responsibility to Protect and the Problem of the Kin-State. UNU Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kenkel, K. M. (2012). Brazil and R2P: Does Taking Responsibility Mean Using Force? Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luck, E. C. (2009). Sovereignty, Choice, and Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mamdani, M. (2009). Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  25. Mani, R., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2011). Responsibility to Protect: Cultural Perspectives in the Global South. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Marks, S. P., & Cooper, N. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect: Watershed or Old Wine in a New Bottle? Jindal Global Law Review, 2(1), 86–130.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, E. (2013). R2P: Implications for World Order. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(3), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien, E., & Sinclair, A. (2011, February–August). The Libyan War: A Diplomatic History. New York, NY: Center of International Cooperation, New York University.Google Scholar
  29. Orford, A. (2011). International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paris, R. (2014). The “Responsibility to Protect” and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention. International Peacekeeping, 21(5), 569–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Popovski, V. (2016). Win-Win Formula for Reforming the Security Council. In G. Z. Capaldo (Ed.), The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (Vol. 1, pp. 153–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Popovski, V. (2017). Renovating the Principal Organs of the United Nations. In W. Durch, J. Larik, & R. Ponzio (Eds.), Just Security in an Undergoverned World (pp. 391–412). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Popovski, V., & Maiangwa, B. (2016). Boko Haram’s Attacks and the People’s Response: A ‘Fourth Pillar’ of the R2P Norm? Africa Security Review, 25(2), 159–175.Google Scholar
  34. Puley, G. (2005). The Responsibility to Protect: East, West and Southern African Perspectives on Preventing and Responding to Humanitarian Crises (Working Paper 05–55). Waterloo, ON: Project Ploughshares.Google Scholar
  35. Reinold, T. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect—Much Ado About Nothing? Review of International Studies, 36(S1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schabas, W. (2005). Preventing Genocide and Mass Killing: The Challenge for the United Nations. London: Report by Minority Rights Group International, British Library.Google Scholar
  37. Semelin, J. (Ed.). (2011). Resisting Genocide: The Multiple Forms of Rescue. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Simms, B., & Trim, D. J. B. (2011). Humanitarian Intervention: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). The Grand Themes of UN Reform. The American Journal of International Law, 99(3), 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teson, F. (1997). Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality. New York: Transnational.Google Scholar
  41. Thakur, R. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect: Norms, Laws and the Use of Force in International Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Thakur, R. (2013). R2P After Libya and Syria: Engaging Emerging Powers. The Washington Quarterly, 36(2), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thakur, R. (2015). R2P’s Structural Problems: A Response to Roland Paris. International Peacekeeping, 22(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thakur, R., & Popovski, V. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect and Prosecute: The Parallel Erosion of Sovereignty and Impunity. In The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (pp. 39–63). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). R2P: From Idea to Norm—And Action? Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O., & Brockmeier, S. (2015). “Responsibility While Protecting”: Reforming R2P Implementation. Global Society, 30(1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UN. (2004). A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility—Report of the UN High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pdf/historical/hlp_more_secure_world.pdf.
  48. UN. (2005). The General Assembly 60th Anniversary Resolution. A/RES/60/1, para. 138–139. 28 May 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf.
  49. Weiss, T. (2016). Humanitarian Intervention: War and Conflict in the Modern World (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Polity.Google Scholar
  50. Zongze, R. (2012, June 15). Responsible Protection: Building a Safer World. China Institute of International Studies. Retrieved from: http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations