Advertisement

Cosmopolitan Paths to Peace

  • Richard Falk
Chapter

Abstract

Cosmopolitanism is at once the oldest and the least tested ideology that addresses the most profound question facing humanity since the first moment of its existence—how best to live together on this earth. The first formulations of a cosmopolitan orientation are to be found in ancient Greece and Rome, with reverberations along similar lines in China and India. At the same time, cosmopolitan ideas have never been put into practice as distinct from their prominence over the centuries in religious, ethical, and utopian traditions of thought. The position taken in this chapter is that an appropriate form of cosmopolitanism remains our best hope for shaping policies and practices, improve prospects for humanity to achieve sustainable humane governance and species survival, and hence, world peace.

References

  1. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Archibugi, D. (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archibugi, D., & Held, D. (Eds.). (1995). Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aurelius, M. (1942). Meditations. New York: Peter Pauper Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, G., & Sohn, L. B. (1966). World Peace Through World Law: Two Alternative Plans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1989). The Common Good: Redirecting the Economy, Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. de Vattel, E. (1758). The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns. In J. Chitty & E. D. Ingraham (Eds.). From the French of Monsieur de Vattel (1858). Philadelphia, PA: T. & J.W. Johnson.Google Scholar
  10. Erasmus, D. (1794). Antipolemics, or The Plea of Reason, Religion, and Humanity, Against War. London: C. Dilly.Google Scholar
  11. Falk, R. (1973). This Endangered Planet. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Falk, R. (1975). A Study of Future Worlds. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Falk, R. (1999). Predatory Globalization: A Critique. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Falk, R. (2016). Power Shift: On the New Global Order. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Falk, R. (2019). Global Law. In M. Jeurgensmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies (Chap. 44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grotius, H. (1625). De jure belli ac pacis [Law of War and Peace]. Parisll: ApudNiclolamm Buon. Google Scholar
  17. Jaspers, K. (1953). The Origin and Goal of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leinen, J., & Bummel, A. (2018). A World Parliament: Governance and Democracy in the 21st Century. Berlin: Democracy Without Borders.Google Scholar
  19. Mendlovitz, S. H. (Ed.). (1975). On the Creation of a Just World Order. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Reves, E. (1945). The Anatomy of Peace. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: New York Review.Google Scholar
  22. Strauss, A. L., & Falk, R. (2011). A Global Parliament: Essays & Articles. Berlin: Committee for a Democratic UN.Google Scholar
  23. Streit, C. (1939). Union Now: A Proposal for a Federal Union of the Democracies of North Atlantic. New York and London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  24. Suganami, H., Carr, M., & Humphreys, A. (2017). The Anarchical Society at 40: Contemporary Challenges and Prospects. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Tarnas, R. (2006). Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Wolff, C. (1749). Law of Nations Treated According to the Scientific Method (J. Drake & T. Ahnert, Trans. [2017]). Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of International Law, EmeritusPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations