Advertisement

Assimilation and Boundary Reinforcement: Ethnic Exogamy and Socialization in Ethnically Mixed Families

  • Tamás Kiss
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the relationship of ethnicity and marriage (ethnic endogamy and exogamy) and the process of ethnic socialization in ethnically mixed families in Transylvania. Both phenomena are analyzed in relation to the processes of ethnic boundary-making and reinforcement. The chapter contains a detailed analysis of the factors that increase the likelihood of ethnic intermarriage and that influence the outcome of ethnic socialization in ethnically mixed marriages. The main finding is that the relatively high levels of ethnic mixing are not conducive to the blurring of ethnic boundaries between Hungarians and Romanians. This apparently puzzling phenomenon is explained as a consequence of the meso-level institutional strategies and boundary policing of the Hungarian elites.

References

  1. Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartha, A., & Decsi, S. (1938). Az erdélyi szórványkérdés: 80 mezőségi falu alapján: Jakabffy Elemér Alapítvány kézirat-katalógusa K43.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M., Blum, T. C., & Schwartz, J. E. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolovan, I., & Dumănescu, L. (Eds.). (2017). Intermarriage in Transylvania, 1895–2010. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar
  8. Bolovan, I., & Eppel, M. (2017). Churches and interfaith marriages in Transylvania: From 1895 to the present. In I. Bolovan & L. Dumănescu (Eds.), Intermarriage in Transylvania, 1895–2010 (pp. 23–47). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R., Feischmidt, M., Fox, J., & Grancea, L. (2006). Nationalist politics and everyday ethnicity in a Transylvanian town. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bucur, M. (2002). Eugenics and modernization in interwar Romania. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csata, I., & Kiss, T. (2007). Népesedési perspektívák. Az erdélyi magyar népesség regionálisan tagolt népesség-előreszámítása 2022-ig és 2032-ig. Kolozsvár: Kriterion.Google Scholar
  13. Culic, I. (2016). Hungarian society in Romania: Political project and practical reality. In S. P. Ramet & M. Valenta (Eds.), Ethnic minorities and politics in post-socialist southeastern Europe (pp. 191–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dribe, M., & Lundh, C. (2011). Cultural dissimilarity and intermarriage. A longitudinal study of immigrants in Sweden 1990–2005. International Migration Review, 45(2), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egry, G. (2015). Etnicitás, identitás, politika: magyar kisebbségek nacionalizmus és regionalizmus között Romániában és Csehszlovákiában 1918–1944 (Első kiadás. ed.). Budapest: Napvilág.Google Scholar
  16. Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2000). Violence and the social construction of ethnic identity. International Organization, 54(4), 845–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnäs, F. (1997). Social integration, heterogeneity, and divorce: The case of the Swedish-speaking population in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 40(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnäs, F., & O’Leary, B. (2003). Choosing for the children: The affiliation of the children of minority-majority group intermarriages. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finnäs, F. (2013). Finlandssvenskarna 2012. En statistisk rapport. Svenska Finlands folkting, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  20. Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Toward a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goldscheider, C. (1986). Jewish continuity and change: Emerging patterns in America. Jewish political and social studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gorenburg, D. (2006). Rethinking interethnic marriage in the Soviet Union. Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gündüz-Hoşgör, A., & Smits, J. (2002). Intermarriage between Turks and Kurds in contemporary Turkey: Inter-ethnic relations in an urbanizing environment. European Sociological Review, 18(4), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hannerz, U. (2000). Flow, boundaries and hybrids: Keywords in transnational anthrophology (Working Paper Series WPTC-2K-02). Stockholm: Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  26. Hărăguş, M. (2014). The role of education in ethnically mixed marriages. In L. Dumănescu, D. Mârza, & M. Eppel (Eds.), Intermarriage throughout history (pp. 389–407). Newcaslte upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  27. Hărăguş, M. (2017). Considerations on ethnically mixed marriages in Transylvania in the last few decades. In I. Bolovan & L. Dumănescu (Eds.), Intermarriage in Transylvania, 1895–2010 (pp. 117–125). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar
  28. Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Horváth, I. (2004). Az etnikailag vegyes házasságok az erdélyi magyar lakosság körében: 1992–2002. In T. Kiss (Ed.), Népesedési folyamatok az ezredfordulón Erdélyben (pp. 235–257). Kolozsvár: Kriterion and RMDSZ Ügyvezető Elnökség.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, R. (2008). Rethinking ethnicity (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalmijn, M., de Graaf, P. M., & Janssen, J. P. G. (2005). Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: The effects of differences in religion and in nationality, 1974–94. Population Studies, 59(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalmijn, M., & Tubergen, F. V. (2010). A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States. Demography, 47(2), 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiss, T. (2006). Interethnic marriages and assimilation in demographic models. In B. Balogh & Z. Ilyés (Eds.), Perspectives of diaspora existence: Hungarian diasporas in the Carpathian Basin: Historical and current contexts of a specific diaspora interpretation and its aspects of ethnic minority protection (pp. 107–139). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  35. Laitin, D. D. (1995). Marginality: A microperspective. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laitin, D. D. (1996). National revival and competitive assimilation in Estonia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 12(1), 25–39.Google Scholar
  37. Laitin, D. D. (1998). Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lamont, M., Silva, G. M., Welburn, J. S., Guetzkow, J., Mizrachi, N., Herzog, H., & Reis, E. (2016). Getting respect: Responding to stigma and discrimination in the United States, Brazil, and Israel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. László, S. (2013). Neglected peripheries: Discovering hybridity in Transylvania. Identities and identifications: Politicized uses of collective identities. Paper presented at the conference Identities and Identifications Politicized Uses of Collective Identities, 18–20 April 2013, Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
  40. Levchenko, P. (2013). Transnational marriages between eastern European-born wives and U.S.-born husbands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  41. Livezeanu, I. (1995). Cultural politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, nation building & ethnic struggle, 1918–1930. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Merton, R. K. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure. Psychiatry, 4(3), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Monden, C. W. S., & Smits, J. (2005). Ethnic intermarriage in times of social change: The case of Latvia. Demography, 42(2), 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Leary, R., & Finnäs, F. (2002). Education, social integration and minority-majority group intermarriage. Sociology, 36(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Öllős, L. (2012, June 9). Ki a magyar? Új Szó Szalon.Google Scholar
  46. Osuji, C. (2013). Confronting whitening in an era of black consciousness: Racial ideology and black-white interracial marriages in Rio de Janeiro. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(10), 1490–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pieterse, J. N. (2001). Hybridity, so what? Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2–3), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pozsony, F. (2007). Szórványok hétköznapjai. In B. Balogh, B. Bodó, & Z. Ilyés (Eds.), Regionális identitás, közösségépítés, szórványgondozás (pp. 49–60). Budapest: Lucius.Google Scholar
  50. Râmneamțu, P. (1937). Problema căsătoriilor mixte în oraşele din Transilvania în perioada de la 1920–1937. Buletin Eugenetic și Biopolitic.Google Scholar
  51. Sheriff, R. E. (2001). Dreaming equality: Color, race, and racism in urban Brazil. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smits, J. (2010). Ethnic intermarriage and social cohesion. What can we learn from Yugoslavia? Social Indicators Research, 96(3), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Szilágyi, N. S. (2002). Észrevételek a romániai magyar népesség fogyásáról, különös tekintettel az asszimilációra. Magyar Kisebbség, 7(4), 64–96.Google Scholar
  54. Szilágyi, N. S. (2004). Az asszimiláció és hatása a népesedési folyamatokra. In T. Kiss (Ed.), Népesedési folyamatok az ezredfordulón Erdélyben (pp. 157–235). Kolozsvár: Kriterion and RMDSZ Ügyvezető Elnökség.Google Scholar
  55. Telegdi-Csetri, V. (2017). Displaying ethnicity through the practices of mixed couples from Transylvania. In I. Bolovan & L. Dumănescu (Eds.), Intermarriage in Transylvania, 1895–2010 (pp. 193–204). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar
  56. Thornton, A. (2005). Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Turai, T. (2003). A családszerkezet változása a szocializmus éveiben a Szilágyságban. Erdélyi Társadalom, 1(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
  58. Turda, M. (2010). Modernism and eugenics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T. (2011). Ethnic minority-majority unions in Estonia. European Journal of Population, 27(3), 313–335.Google Scholar
  60. Varga, E. Á. (1998). Fejezetek a jelenkori Erdély népesedéstörténetéből. Budapest: Püski.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (2 Vols., p. 1469). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. Oxford studies in culture and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yagmur, K., & Ehala, M. (2011). Tradition and innovation in the Ethnolinguistic Vitality theory. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zolberg, A. R., & Woon, L. L. (1999). Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics & Society, 27(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás Kiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Romanian Institute for Research on National MinoritiesCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations