Advertisement

Introduction: Unequal Accommodation, Ethnic Parallelism, and Increasing Marginality

  • Tamás Kiss
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

The introduction outlines the conceptual framework, the levels of analysis, and the main arguments of the volume. The core concept of the book is minority political agency, which has two complementary dimensions: political claim-making and community organizing. While interethnic bargaining is central to the former, for the latter the idea of ethnic parallelism is of key importance at both the discursive and institutional level. The chapters of the volume are grouped into three broad parts, according to their level of analysis. The first three chapters discuss macro-level phenomena, the next five focus on the meso-level (the institutional network providing the backbone of a Hungarian societal pillar), and the last three deal with the consequences of the interplay of the macro- and meso-level on micro-level phenomena.

References

  1. Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreescu, G. (2000). Continuarea participării UDMR la guvernare – prima fază a democrației consensualiste românești? Provincia, 1(7), 2–3. Google Scholar
  4. Bakk, M. (2000). Modellviták – rejtett stratégiák. Magyar Kisebbség, 6(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
  5. Balić, L., & Izmirlija, M. (2013). Consociation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Practical implementation of the theoretical principles. South-East European Journal of Political Science, 1(3), 121–134.Google Scholar
  6. Bárdi, N., Gidó, A., & Novák, C. Z. (2014). Együtt és külön: az erdélyi magyarok önszerveződése (1989–1990). Kolozsvár: Nemzeti Kisebbségkutató Intézet.Google Scholar
  7. Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Scandinavian University books. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget; London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Belloni, R. (2004). Peacebuilding and consociational electoral engineering in Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Peacekeeping, 11(2), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bíró, A., & Pallai, K. (2011). Public financing of national minority organisations: Policy paradigms, policy regimes and good practice. Study prepared for the committee of experts on issues relating to the protection of national minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  10. Biró, Z. A. (1998). Intézményesedési folyamatok a romániai magyarság körében. In Z. A. Biró (Ed.), Stratégia vagy kényszerpályák? Tanulmányok a romániai magyar társadalomról (pp. 16–47). Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  11. Bochsler, D., & Szöcsik, E. (2013). Building inter-ethnic bridges or promoting ethno-territorial demarcation lines? Hungarian minority parties in competition. Nationalities Papers, 41(5), 761–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brubaker, R. (1998). Migrations of ethnic unmixing in the “New Europe’’. International Migration Review, 32(4), 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brubaker, R. (2009). National homogenization and ethnic reproduction on the European periphery. In M. Barbagli & H. Ferguson (Eds.), La teoria sociologica e lo stato moderno: saggi in onore di Gianfranco Poggi (pp. 201–221). Bologna: Il mulino.Google Scholar
  16. Brubaker, R. (2011). Nationalizing states revisited: Projects and processes of nationalization in post-Soviet states. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(11), 1785–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brubaker, R., Feischmidt, M., Fox, J., & Grancea, L. (2006). Nationalist politics and everyday ethnicity in a Transylvanian town. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brusis, M. (2015). The European Union and interethnic power-sharing arrangements in accession countries. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 14(4), 60–78.Google Scholar
  19. Chandra, K. (2006). What is ethnic identity and does it matter? Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chandra, K. (2011). What is an ethnic party? Party Politics, 17(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Csergő, Z. (2002). Beyond ethnic division: Majority-minority debate about the postcommunist state in Romania and Slovakia. East European Politics & Societies, 16(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Csergő, Z. (2007). Talk of the nation: Language and conflict in Romania and Slovakia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Csergő, Z., & Regelmann, A.-C. (2017). Europeanization and collective rationality in minority voting. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(5), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobre, A. M. (2003). EU conditionality building and Romanian minority rights policy: Towards the Europeanisation of the candidate countries. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 4(1), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fenton, S. (2003). Ethnicity. Key concepts. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gherghina, S., & Jiglau, G. (2011). Explaining ethnic mobilisation in post-communist countries. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(1), 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorenburg, D. P. (2003). Minority ethnic mobilization in the Russian Federation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hermann, G. (2003). Náció és nemzet: székely rendi nacionalizmus és magyar nemzettudat 1848-ig. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  30. Hodžić, E., & Mraović, B. (2015). Political representation of minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina: How reserved seats affect minority representatives’ influence on decision-making and perceived substantive representation. Ethnopolitics, 14(4), 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Horváth, I. (2002). Facilitating conflict transformation: Implementation of the recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities to Romania, 1993–2001 (Working Paper). Hamburg: CORE.Google Scholar
  33. Horváth, I. (2013). The Romanian Roma: The dilemma of integration. In E. Dácz (Ed.), Minderheitenfragen in Ungarn und in den Nachbarländern im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 305–325). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horváth, I., & Scacco, A. (2001). From the unitary to the pluralistic: Fine-tuning minority policy in Romania. In A. Bíró & P. Kovács (Eds.), Diversity in action: Local public management of multiethnic communities in central and eastern Europe (pp. 243–271). Budapest: OSI.Google Scholar
  35. Jenkins, R. (2008). Rethinking ethnicity (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Kántor, Z. (2000). Kisebbségi nemzetépítés. A romániai magyarság mint nemzetépítõ kisebbség. Regio, 11(3), 219–241.Google Scholar
  37. Kántor, Z., & Bárdi, N. (2002). The democratic alliance of Hungarians in Romania (DAHR) in the government of Romania from 1996 to 2000. Regio. Minorities, Politics, Society, 2(1), 188–226.Google Scholar
  38. Kasapović, M. (2005). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Consociational or liberal democracy? Politička misao, 17(5), 3–30.Google Scholar
  39. Kiss, T. (2017). Beyond the ethnic vote: Shifting determinants of the electoral behavior of Transylvanian Hungarians. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1336422.
  40. Kiss, T., & Székely, I. G. (2016). Shifting linkages in ethnic mobilization: The case of RMDSZ and the Hungarians in Transylvania. Nationalities Papers, 44(4), 591–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kiss, T., Székely, I. G., & Barna, G. (2017). Factors affecting turnout among ethnic minority voters: The case of Hungarians in Transylvania. Intersections. EEJSP, 3(4), 87–119.Google Scholar
  42. Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural odysseys: Navigating the new international politics of diversity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kymlicka, W. (2011). Beyond the indigenous/minority dichotomy? In S. Allen & A. Xanthaki (Eds.), Reflections on the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples (pp. 183–208). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Laitin, D. D. (1998). Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lamont, M., Silva, G. M., Welburn, J. S., Guetzkow, J., Mizrachi, N., Herzog, H., & Reis, E. (2016). Getting respect: Responding to stigma and discrimination in the United States, Brazil, and Israel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. László, M., & Novák, C. Z. (2012). A szabadság terhe. Marosvásárhely, 1990. március 16–21. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  48. Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lijphart, A. (2004). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lőrincz, D. J. (2008). A kolozsvári magyarok társadalma. Regio, 19(2), 240–256.Google Scholar
  52. Malloy, T. H., Osipov, A., & Vizi, B. (Eds.). (2015). Managing diversity through non-territorial autonomy: Assessing advantages, deficiencies, and risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., & Simeon, R. (2008). Integration or accommodation? In S. Choudhry (Ed.), Constitutional design for divided societies: Integration or accommodation? (pp. 41–88). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Medianu, N. (2002). Analysing political exchanges between minority and majority leaders in Romania. Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(4), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mihailescu, M. (2008). The politics of minimal “consensus”: Interethnic opposition coalitions in post-communist Romania (1990–96) and Slovakia (1990–98). East European Politics & Societies, 22(3), 553–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (1999). Transilvania subiectivă. București: Humanitas.Google Scholar
  57. Nastasă, L., & Salat, L. (Eds.). (2000). Relații interetnice în România postcomunistă. Cluj: Fundația CRDE.Google Scholar
  58. Orlović, S. (2015). Consociational experiments in the western Balkans: Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia. New Balkan Politics, 17, 29–50.Google Scholar
  59. OSCE-HCNM. (1999). The Lund Recommendations on the effective participation of national minorities in public life & explanatory note. OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities.Google Scholar
  60. Pettai, V., & Hallik, K. (2002). Understanding processes of ethnic control: Segmentation, dependency and co-optation in post-communist Estonia. Nations and Nationalism, 8(4), 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ram, M. H. (2003). Democratization through European integration: The case of minority rights in the Czech Republic and Romania. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(2), 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rechel, B. (2009a). Introduction. In B. Rechel (Ed.), Minority rights in central and eastern Europe (pp. 3–16). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Rechel, B. (Ed.). (2009b). Minority rights in central and eastern Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Saideman, S. M., & Ayres, R. W. (2008). For kin or country: Xenophobia, nationalism, and war. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Salat, L., Constantin, S., Osipov, A. G., & Székely, I. G. (2014). Autonomy arrangements around the world: A collection of well and lesser known cases. Cluj-Napoca: Institutul pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităților Naționale.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, A. D. (1995). Gastronomy or geology? The role of nationalism in the reconstruction of nations. Nations and Nationalism, 1(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, D. J. (2013). Non-territorial autonomy and political community in contemporary central and eastern Europe. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 12(1), 27–55.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, D. J., & Cordell, K. (Eds.). (2007). Cultural autonomy in contemporary Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Smooha, S. (2001). The model of ethnic democracy (ECMI Working Paper 13).Google Scholar
  71. Stroschein, S. (2001). Measuring ethnic party success in Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 48(4), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stroschein, S. (2012). Ethnic struggle, coexistence, and democratization in eastern Europe. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Székely, I. G. (2011). Democraţie consociaţionistă sau împărţirea puterii în societăţi multietnice. Cadru teoretic şi patru studii de caz. Cluj: Institutul pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităților Naționale—Kriterion.Google Scholar
  74. Székely, I. G., & Horváth, I. (2014). Diversity recognition and minority representation in central and southeast Europe: A comparative analysis. Nationalities Papers, 42(3), 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tsai, K. S. (2014). Informal institutions and historical institutionalism. APSA 2014 annual meeting. 14 August 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2454845.
  77. Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. California series on social choice and political economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  78. Varshney, A. (2003). Nationalism, ethnic conflict, and rationality. Perspective on Politics, 1(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waterbury, M. A. (2017). National minorities in an era of externalization. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(5), 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. Oxford studies in culture and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás Kiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Romanian Institute for Research on National MinoritiesCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations