Advertisement

Geomagnetism Exploration of the Egyptian Archaeology: Thirty-Years of Success and Challenges

  • T. Abdallatif
  • H. H. Odah
  • A. E. El Emam
  • A. Mohsen
Chapter
Part of the Natural Science in Archaeology book series (ARCHAEOLOGY)

Abstract

The very long history of Egypt is a matter of attraction for many scientists, researchers from different countries all over the world. Egypt has many unexplored archeological sites. The archeologists know where to search, but they like to know where to dig.

The problem is: Traditional and random archaeological excavations consume more time, effort and Money. The best way is to explore the archeological remains using passive geophysical tools (e.g. magnetic and EM methods) without destroy or dig in the area.

The ancient Egyptian archaeological constructions are composed of different materials (e.g. Stone, mud, mortar, wood, Alabaster, granite, sandstone…etc.). Limestone and mud bricks are, however, basic materials in most of these constructions. Mud bricks are mainly composed of clay and mud extracted from the Nile River, and in some cases, they are mixed with a binding materials such as rice husks or straw. They were used to some extent in pre-Roman Egypt, and their use increased at the time of Roman influence.

Mud brick features within archaeological sites possess rather high magnetic properties than the surrounding soil. They are enriched with magnetic minerals (i.e. magnetite) that respond effectively to magnetic measurements. This indicates highly remanent and induced magnetization of the mud bricks, resulting in rather strong magnetic field, which can be measured by high-resolution instruments.

The application of geomagnetic in archaeological prospection has been begun in Egypt has started by pioneers (Hussein, 1983) after around 30 years of worldwide application. In the middle of Nineties (1990s) of the last century in Egypt, a new technology (i.e. magnetic gradiometry) with high speed and sampling rate, has proven to be ideal for near-surface mud bricks investigation, leading to real archaeological discoveries at different places in Egypt.

The present study aimed to analyze the development of archaeomagnetic prospection in Egypt during the last 30 years in order to assess the future directions and possible potential in this important aspect for an historical country like Egypt.

Seven examples from different districts in Egypt have been introduced to show the usage of magnetic gradiometry to explore the shallow structures made of mud bricks.

Keywords

Magnetic gradimetry Processing sequence Statistical detection Mud bricks Cemetery Hawara Deahshour Egypt 

References

  1. Abbas AM, Abdallatif TF, Shaaban FA, Salem A, Suh A (2005) Archaeological investigation of the eastern extensions of the Karnak Temple using ground penetrating radar and magnetic tools. Geoarchaeology 20(5):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdallatif TF (1998) Magnetic prospection for some archaeological sites in Egypt. Ph.D. thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdallatif TF, Abd-All EM, Suh M, Mohamed RM, El-Hemaly I (2005) Magnetic tracing at Abu Sir (land of forgotten pyramids), Northern Egypt. Geoarchaeology 20(5):483–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abdallatif TF, Mousa SE, Elbassiony A (2003) Geophysical investigation for mapping the archaeological features at Qantir, Sharqyia, Egypt. Archaeol Prospect 10:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abdallatif TF, Suh M, Oh J, Kim KH (2007) Impact of magnetic survey design on the imaging of small archeological objects: practicability in gradiometer surveying. Lead Edge 26(5):571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Abdallatif TF, El Emam AE, Suh M, El Hemaly IA, Ghazala HH, Ibrahim EH, Odah HH, Deebes HA (2010) Discovery of the causeway and the mortuary temple of the Pyramid of Amenemhat II using near-surface magnetic investigation, Dahshour, Giza, Egypt. Geophys Prospect 58:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ackerman J (1971) Downward continuation using the measured vertical gradient. Geophysics 36(3):609–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aitken MJ, Webster G, Rees A (1958) Magnetic prospecting. Antiquity 32:270–271Google Scholar
  9. Barongo JO (1985) Method for depth estimation on aeromagnetic vertical gradient anomalies. Geophysics 50:963–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartington Instruments Ltd (1999) Operation manual for MS2 magnetic susceptibility system. Bartington Instruments, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Bard KA (2007) An introduction to the archaeology of ancient Egypt, Wiley-Blackwell, 424p, 978-1-4051-1149-2Google Scholar
  12. Black AC, Norton WW (1993) Blue guide Egypt. Bedford, London, 762pGoogle Scholar
  13. Breiner S (1973) Application manual for portable magnetometers. Geometrics, SunnyvaleGoogle Scholar
  14. Butler DK (2005) Near-surface geophysics. SEG, TulsaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark JA (1990) Seeing beneath the soil: prospection methods in archaeology. B.T. Batsford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David A (1995) Geophysical survey in archaeological field evaluation. Research & Professional Services, Guideline No. (1), pp 1–35Google Scholar
  17. Dearing JA (1994) Environmental magnetic susceptibility using the Bartington MS2 system. British library cataloguing in publication data. 0952340909Google Scholar
  18. El-Bassiony AA (2001) Geophysical archaeoprospection in the Saqqara and Qantir areas, Egypt. Master thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  19. El Emam A, Abdallatif T, Suh M, Odah H (2014) Delineation of Egyptian mud bricks using magnetic gradiometer techniques. Ar J Geosci 7:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fassbinder J, Becker H, Herbich T (2001) Magnetometry in the desert Area west of Zoser’s Pyramid, Saqqara, Egypt, w: Magnetic prospecting in archeological sites, Becker & Fassbinder (red.), Monuments and Sites VI, Munich, pp s.64–65Google Scholar
  21. Geoscan Research (1987) Instruction manual version 1.0 (Fluxgate Gradiometer FM9, FM18, FM36). Geoscan Research, BradfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Geoscan Research (2005) Instruction manual 1.01. (Geoplot 2.01). Geoscan Research, BradfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghazala H, El-Mahmoudi AS, Abdallatif TF (2003) Archaeogeophysical study on the site of Tell Toukh El-Qaramous, Sharkia Governorate, East Nile Delta, Egypt. Archaeol Prospect 10:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson TH (1986) Magnetic prospection on prehistoric sites in Western Canada, University of Alberta. Geophysics 51:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbich T (2003) Archaeological geophysics in Egypt: the polish contribution. Archaeol Polona 41:13–55Google Scholar
  26. Hewison NR (1984) The Fayoum; A practical guide, The American University in Cairo Press, 85pGoogle Scholar
  27. Hood P (1965) Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying. Geophysics 3(5):891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hood PJ, Holroyd MT, McGrath PH (1979) Magnetic methods applied to base metal exploration. In: Hood PJ (ed) Geophysics and geochemistry in the search for metallic ores: Geol Surv Can Econ Geol Rep, vol 31, pp 527–544Google Scholar
  29. Hussain AG (1983) Magnetic prospecting for Archaeology in Kom Oshim and Kiman Faris, Fayoum, Egypt. ZES 110:36–51Google Scholar
  30. Kamei H, Atya MA, Abdallatif TF, Mori M, Hemthavy P (2002) Ground-penetrating radar and magnetic survey to the west of Al-Zayyan Temple, Kharga Oasis, Al-Wadi Al-Jadeed (New Valley), Egypt. Archaeol Prospect 9:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keating P, Pilkington M (2004) Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophys Prospect 52:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khozyam A (2003) Geophysical prospection of some archaeological sites in Saqqara area, Giza, Egypt. Master thesis, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  33. Mousa SEA, Abdallatif TF, Hussain AG, AlBassiony AA (2001) Application of geophysical tools for mapping the archaeological features at Saqqara, Giza, Egypt. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Egyptian Geophysical Society, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  34. Odah H, Abdallatif TF, Hussain AG (1998) Micromagnetic prospecting to delineate the buried solar boats in Abydos area, Sohag, Egypt. J Environ Sci Mansoura University, Egypt 16:121–133Google Scholar
  35. Odah H, Abdallatif TF, El-Hemaly IA, Abd El-All E (2005) Gradiometer survey to locate the ancient remains distributed to the northeast of the Zoser Pyramid, Saqqara, Giza, Egypt. Archaeol Prospect 12:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Connor D (1997) Report on Abydos: the early dynastic project, New York University, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  37. Pedersen LB (1989) Relations between horizontal and vertical gradients of potential fields. Geophysics 54:662–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petrie WMF (1889) Hawara, Biahmu and Arsinoe, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers A (1992) New complete guide of Egypt, Italy, 146pGoogle Scholar
  40. Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I (1990) Archaeological prospecting and remote sensing, topics in remote sensing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 375–516Google Scholar
  41. Shaw I (2000) History of ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Slack HA, Lynch VM, Langan L (1967) The geomagnetic gradiometer. Geophysics 3(2):877–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uytterhoeven I (2003) Hawara in the Graeco-Roman period. Life and death in a Fayum village. Doctoraat in de ArcheologieGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams V, Stocks P (1993) Blue guide, Egypt, Atlas, Street atlas of Cairo, maps, plans and illustrations. Ernest Benn, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Abdallatif
    • 1
  • H. H. Odah
    • 1
  • A. E. El Emam
    • 1
  • A. Mohsen
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Institute of Astronomy and GeophysicsCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations