Application of Tensorial Electrical Resistivity Mapping to Archaeological Prospection
In an archaeological site (Pilisszentkereszt Cistercian Monastery, Hungary) we carried out 3D tensorial geoelectric mapping measurements. We applied the well known tensorial form of Ohm’s differential law, where a 2 × 2 resistivity tensor relates the horizontal current density vector and the corresponding electric field vector. In the DC apparent resistivity tensor there are three independent rotational invariants, and we defined two alternative sets. In the field two perpendicular AB directions were used, and 16∙15 = 240 potential electrodes (with an equidistant space of Δx = Δy = 50 cm) were put in the central (nearly squared, 7.5 m ∙ 7 m) area between the current electrodes. Due to a four-channel measuring system, it was possible to determine both components of a horizontal electric vector at the same time. The time needed to measure all potential differences between the neighbouring potential electrodes (thus to obtain 15∙14 = 210 resistivity tensors), was about 40 min. The tensorial results are shown together with the results of traditional measurements. Man-made origin anomalies as a subsurface channel, building remnants, a furnace and an ancient road have been discovered and described. In field conditions, any resistivity estimation provides reliable information about the subsurface (both the tensor invariants and the traditional mean values). At the same time, the multidimensional (2D and 3D) indicators proved to be informative only in case of significant subsurface inhomogeneities.
KeywordsTensor Resistivity Mapping Archaeology
Theoretical part of the work was started out already in frames of projects TS408048 (2002–2004) and T37694 (2002–2005) of the Hungarian Research Fund; various aspects were elaborated in frames of projects T049604 (2005) and NI 61013 (started in 2006). The field measurements were sponsored by the Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (where the leader of project Medium Regni was Dr. Elek Benkő). J. Túri, A. Kovács and several students (first of all Zs. Pap and A. Károlyi) took part in the field measurement or/and the data processing. M. Varga and A. Novák are PhD students at the University of West-Hungary, Sopron. Comments by A. Ádám (GGRI HAS), the referees (G. Tsokas, P. Mauriello) and the Associate Editor (P. Tsourlos) are also acknowledged.
- Cammarano F, Di Fiore B, Mauriello P, Patella D (2000) Examples of application of electrical tomographies and radar profiling to cultural heritage. Annali di Geophysica 43:309–324Google Scholar
- Di Fiore B, Mauriello P, Monna D, Patella D (2002) Examples of application of tensorial resistivity probality tomography to architectonic and archaeological targets. Ann Geophys 45:417–429Google Scholar
- Futterer B (2000) Tensorgeoelektrik in der Anwendung. Insttut für Geophysik, TU Bergakademie Freiberg (Supervisor: R.U. Börner), Student Research Project. http://www.geophysik.tu-freiberg.de/spitzer/Download_Store/Publications/Students-Research-Project/Futterer-Studienarbeit.pdf
- Gerevich L (1977) Pilis Abbey a cultural center. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 29:155–198Google Scholar
- Kakas K (1981) DC potential mapping (PM). In: Annual report of the Eötvös Loránd Geophysical Institute of Hungary for 1980, pp 163–165Google Scholar
- Kunetz G (1966) Principles of direct current resistivity prospecting. Borntraeger, Berlin-Nikolassee, pp 31–33Google Scholar
- Majkuth T, Ráner G, Szabadváry L, Tóth CS (1973) Results of methodological developments in the Transdanubian Central Range: direct exploration of bauxite bearing structures near Bakonyoszlop (in Hungarian). Report of the Eötvös Loránd Geophysical Institute, BudapestGoogle Scholar
- Simon A (1974) Theory of potential mapping and its processing methods (in Hungarian). Report of the Eötvös Loránd Geophysical Institute, BudapestGoogle Scholar
- Szalai S (2000) About the depth of investigation of different D.C. dipole-dipole arrays. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 35:63–73Google Scholar
- Szarka L (1984) Analogue modelling of DC mapping methods. Acta Geod Geophys Mont Hung 19:451–465Google Scholar