Advertisement

Situating Disabled Sexual Voices in the Global South

  • Paul Chappell
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the increased volume of disability and sexuality research studies, most of these are situated in the Global North. As a result, scholarship surrounding disabled sexualities in the Global South tends to remain ‘in the closet’ and are less publicised. Moreover, not too dissimilar to the constructs of the sexualities of colonised bodies, the discourse of disabled sexualities in the Global South has also been subject to the same ahistorical and apolitical disregard. Based on this premise, the following chapter aims to situate disabled sexual voices in the Global South by critically exploring the histories of sexualities and how ‘sexual truths’ have shaped our understandings of disabled sexualities in the Global South. The chapter also introduces other contributions included in the book.

Keywords

Disability Sexuality Global south Colonialism Histories 

References

  1. Altman, D. (2004). Sexuality and globalization. Journal of Sexual Research & Social Policy, 1(1), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhana, D., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., & Moletsane, R. (2007). Power and identity: An introduction to sexualities in Southern Africa. Sexualities, 10(2), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buthelezi, T. (2006). The one who has eaten it, has only eaten a part: Exploring traditional Zulu premarital sexual practices. Sexualities in Africa, 3(2), 3–5.Google Scholar
  4. Cacchioni, T., & Tiefer, L. (2012). Why medicalization? Introduction to the special issue on the medicalization of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 49(4), 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carew, M. T., Braathen, S. H., Swartz, L., Hunt, X., & Rohleder, P. (2017). The sexual lives of people with disabilities within low- and middle-income countries: A scoping study of studies published in English. Global Health Action, 10, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chappell, P. (2014). How Zulu-speaking youth with physical and sensory disabilities understand love and relationships in constructing their sexual identities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(9), 1156–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corrales, J. (2015). LGBT rights and representation in Latin America and the Caribbean: The influence of structure, movements, institutions, and culture. Chapel Hill: LGBT Representation and Rights and University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  8. Crowley, U., & Kitchin, R. (2008). Producing ‘decent girls’: Governmentality and the moral geographies of sexual conduct in Ireland (1922–1937). Gender, Place and Culture, 15(4), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delius, P., & Glaser, C. (2002). Sexual socialisation in South Africa: A historical perspective. African Studies, 61(1), 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutta, A. (2015). Sexualities, South Asia. The International Encyclopaedia of Human Sexuality, 1115–1354.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs468.
  11. Epprecht, M. (2008). Heterosexual Africa: The history of an idea from the age of exploration to the age of AIDS. Ohio and Scottsville: Ohio University Press and University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality vol. 1: An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frohmader, C., & Ortoleva, S. (2013, July 1–2). The sexual and reproductive rights of women and girls with disabilities. Paper presented at the International Conference on Population and Development, Beyond, Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. Galvin, R. (2006). A genealogy of the disabled identity in relation to work and sexuality. Disability & Society, 21(5), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez, M. T. (2012). The S words: Sexuality, sensuality, sexual expression and people with intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 30, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: Why colonialism matters in the disability and global south debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanass-Hancock, J., Chappell, P., Myezwa, H., Kwagala, B., Boivin, J.M., Lloyd, J., … Chetty, V. (2016). Committing to disability inclusion to end AIDS by 2030. Lancet-HIV, 3: 556–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jawale, K. V. (2016). Issues and challenges of ‘LGBT’ minority people in India. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(6), 408–410.Google Scholar
  20. Kidwai, S., & Vanita, R. (Eds.). (2002). Same-sex love in India: Readings from literature and history. New Delhi: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Lavrin, A. (1991). Sexuality in colonial Spanish America. In A. Lavrin (Ed.), Sexuality and marriage in Colonial Latin America (pp. 132–152). Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mamdani, M. (1976). The ideology of population control. Economic and Political Weekly, 11(31/33), 1141–1148.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, F., Jackson, P. A., McLelland, M., & Yue, A. (Eds.). (2008). AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking genders and sexualities. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Massoud, M. F. (2003). The evolution of gay rights in South Africa. Peace Review, 15(3), 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. McRuer, R., & Mollow, A. (2012). Sex and disability. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Numer, M., & Gahagan, J. (2009). The sexual health of gay men in the post-AIDS era: Feminist, post-structuralist and queer theory perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nyanzi, S. (2011). Unpacking the [govern]mentality of African sexualities. In S. Tamale (Ed.), African sexualities: A reader (pp. 477–501). Cape Town: Fahamu and Pambazuka Press.Google Scholar
  30. Reid, G., & Walker, L. (2005). Sex and secrecy: A focus on African sexualities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(3), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Segal, P. (2009). Latin America and the challenge of globalizing the history of sexuality. American History Review, 114(5), 1053–1340.Google Scholar
  33. Shakespeare, T. (1999). The Sexual Politics of disabled masculinity. Sexuality and Disability, 17(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shakespeare, T. (2000). Disabled sexuality: Toward rights and recognition. Sexuality and Disability, 18(3), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sellis, K., & Davies, D. (1996). The sexual politics of disability. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  36. Sharpe, J., & Pinto, S. (2006). The sweetest taboo: Studies of Caribbean sexualities; A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 32(1), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shildrick, M. (2005). The disabled body, genealogy and undecidability. Cultural Studies, 19(6), 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shildrick, M. (2007). Dangerous discourses: Anxiety, desire and disability. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 8(3), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuttleworth, R. (2010). Towards an inclusive sexuality and disability research agenda. In R. Shuttleworth & T. Sanders (Eds.), Sex & disability: Politics, identity and access (pp. 1–17). Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shuttleworth, R., & Mona, L. (2002). Toward a focus on sexual access in disability and sexuality advocacy and research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(3), 2–9.Google Scholar
  41. Steyn, M., & van Zyl, J. (2009). The prize and the price. In M. Steyn & J. van Zyl (Eds.), The prize and the price: Shaping sexualities in South Africa (pp. 3–20). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tamale, S. (2011). Researching and theorising sexualities in Africa. In S. Tamale (Ed.), African sexualities: A reader (pp. 11–36). Cape Town: Fahamu and Pambazuka Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tremain, S. (2001). On the government of disability. Social Theory and Practice, 27(4), 617–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. UN. (1994). Standard rules for the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: United Nation Press.Google Scholar
  45. UN. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  46. UNAIDS. (2017). Disability and HIV. Geneva: Switzerland. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2905_disability-and-HIV_en.pdf.
  47. Wentzell, E. (2006). Bad bedfellows: Disability sex rights and viagra. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(5), 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. WHO. (2002, January 28–31). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/defining_sexual_health.pdf.
  49. WHO. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization. (2015). Sexual health, human rights and the law. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/175556.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Chappell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations