Leading from the Engine Room

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10711)

Abstract

This paper explores relationships and challenges facing teams creating simulation-based learning environments. Drawing on our experience of governance within Australian Indigenous cultures and specific work incidents as case studies, we explore tensions, triumphs and insights occurring during collaborative ventures intended to produce online learning activities. Our view is ‘from the engine room’ - at that point where technology and design expertise reframe creative ‘story boards’ into ‘interactive learning experiences’ requiring productive harnessing of diversity. Creation of scenario-based learning environments requires an understanding of specific content, along with the array of available learning pathways. Appreciating pitfalls likely to hinder the design process is vital. Scenarios use specific, and specialized artefacts and technologies to create interactive learning environments; computer-based technologies make the process even more complex, requiring highly specialized skills to contribute particular elements. More and more people are involved, and a greater number of specializations contribute to the final product. We draw on Human Computer Interaction practices to explore designer - developer interfaces and explore what may be involved in developing aware, conscious leadership of this emergent complexity. Words penned by Harrison (1967) aptly encapsulate our theme - “We were talking about the space between us all”.

Keywords

Leadership Diverse skills Design teams  Scenario-based learning 

References

  1. Graham, M.: Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of aboriginal worldviews. Aust. Hum. Rev. 45, 181–194 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Pascoe, B.: Dark Emu: Black Seeds Agriculture or Accident. Magabala Books, Broome (2014)Google Scholar
  3. Harrison, G.: Within You Without You. Sergeant Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967)Google Scholar
  4. Heron, J.: The Complete Facilitator’s Handbook. Kogan Page, London (1999)Google Scholar
  5. Leigh, E.: A Practitioner Researcher perspective on facilitating an open, infinite, chaordic simulation (2003, unpublished doctoral UTS)Google Scholar
  6. Lloyd, D.: Colonial trauma/postcolonial recovery? Interventions 2(2), 212–228 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1080/136980100427324. Accessed 14 Apr 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kutay, C., Kadi, A., Canning, J.: Flipped learning not flopped learning. In: Proceedings of AAEE, Manly, December 2017Google Scholar
  8. Kutay, C., Riley, L., Mooney, J., Howard-Wagner, D.: Teaching aboriginal culture online: sustaining traditions of knowledge sharing. In: Proceedings of Ascilite (2012)Google Scholar
  9. Mulligan, R.: The super seasprite simulator visual - an unwise choice? In: Simulation Conference and Exhibition - SimTecT (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T.: Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  11. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction (2001)Google Scholar
  12. Sveiby, K.-E., Skuthorpe, T.: Treading Lightly. Allen & Unwin, Sydney (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Tuckman, B.W., Jensen, M.A.: Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Organ. Stud. 2(4), 419–427 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tune in Now (2014). http://www.tuneinnow.com.au/module_3. Accessed 20 June 2016
  15. Royce, W.: Managing the development of large software systems. In: Technical Papers of Western Electronic Show and Convention (WesCon) 25–28 August 1970, Los Angeles, USA (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia
  2. 2.FutureSearchSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations