Advertisement

The Grammaticalization of Indirect Reports: The Cantonese Discourse Particle wo5

  • John C. Wakefield
  • Hung Yuk Lee
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 19)

Abstract

This paper proposes a definition for the Cantonese sentence-final discourse particle wo5, which marks the proposition contained within a clause as an indirect report that does not belong to the speaker. The methodology for defining wo5 is based on the natural semantic metalanguage theory and draws on Besemeres and Wierzbicka’s (2003: 3) “general model for the investigation of discourse markers,” the goal of which is to “come up with a formula which would make sense in all the contexts in which [the discourse particle] can occur, and which could also explain why in some contexts… [it] cannot be used at all” (p. 19). The definition we propose is discussed in light of what other authors have said about wo5, and is tested against a number of examples within which wo5 can and cannot appear.

Keywords

indirect reports grammaticalization cantonese discourse particles wo5 

References

  1. Besemeres, Mary, and Anna Wierzbicka 2003. The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English. Pragmatics & Cognition 11.1: 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Capone, A. 2016. On the (complicated) relationship between direct and indirect reports. In Indirect reports and pragmatics, eds. Alessandro Capone, Kiefer, F., and Lo Piparo, F., 55–75. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Cheung, Hung-nin Samuel. 2007. 香港粵語語法的研究[A grammar of Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong] (Revised edition). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fang, Xiaoyan. 2003. 廣州方言句末語氣助詞 [Sentence-final mood particles of the Cantonese dialect]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fung, Roxana Suk-Yee. 2000. Final particles in Standard Cantonese: Semantic extension and pragmatic inference (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  6. Goddard, C. 2004. Semantic primes within and across languages. In Contrastive analysis in language: Identifying linguistic units of comparison, eds. Dominique Willems, Defrancq, B., Colleman, T., and Noël, D., 13–43. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Goddard, C. 2008. Natural semantic metalanguage: The state of the art. In Cross-linguistic semantics, ed. Cliff Goddard, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goddard, Cliff. 2011. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goddard, C., and A. Wierzbicka. 2002. Semantic primes and Universal Grammar. In Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings (Vol. I), eds. Cliff Goddard, and Wierzbicka, A., 41–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goddard, Cliff, and A. Wierzbicka, 2014. Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  12. Law, Ann. 2004. Sentence-final focus particles in Cantonese (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University College, London.Google Scholar
  13. Leung, Chung-sum. 2005/1992. 當代香港粵語語助詞的研究 [A Study of the Utterance Particles in Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong]. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. Leung, Wai-mun. 2006. On the synchrony and diachrony of sentence-final particles: The case of wo in Cantonese (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthews, S. 1998. Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo3, wo4, and wo5! In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 325–334. Taipei: Academica Sinica.Google Scholar
  16. Sybesma, Rint, and Boya Li. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua, 117.10:1739–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Yap, F. H., Y. Yang, and T.-S. Wong. 2014. On the development of sentence final particles (and utterance tags) in Chinese. In Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change, eds. Kate Beeching, and Detges, U., 179–220. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Wakefield
    • 1
  • Hung Yuk Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations