Advertisement

Sarcopenia and Hip Structure Analysis Variables in a Group of Lebanese Postmenopausal Women

  • Riad Nasr
  • Eric Watelain
  • Antonio PintiEmail author
  • Hayman Saddik
  • Ghassan Maalouf
  • Abdel-Jalil Berro
  • Abir Alwan
  • César El Khoury
  • Ibrahim Fayad
  • Rawad El Hage
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10814)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare hip structural analysis variables in postmenopausal women with sarcopenia and postmenopausal women with normal skeletal muscle mass index. This study included 8 postmenopausal women (aged between 65 and 84 years) with sarcopenia and 60 age-matched controls (with normal skeletal muscle mass index (SMI)). Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Weight, lean mass, Body mass index, femoral neck cross-sectional area (FN CSA), FN section modulus (Z), FN cross sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), intertrochanteric (IT) CSA, IT Z, IT CSMI, IT cortical thickness (CT), femoral shaft (FS) CSA, FS Z and FS CSMI were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in women with normal SMI compared to women with sarcopenia. In the whole population, SMI was positively correlated to IT CSA, IT Z, IT CSMI, IT CT, FS CSA, FS Z, FS CSMI, FS CT but negatively correlated to IT buckling ratio (BR) and FS BR. The present suggests that sarcopenia negatively affects hip bone strength indices in postmenopausal women.

Keywords

Sarcopenia DXA imaging Strength indices Fracture risk 

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baumgartner, R.N., Koehler, K.M., Gallagher, D., et al.: Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in new Mexico. Am. J. Epidemiol. 147(8), 755–763 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cruz-Jentoft, A.J., Baeyens, J.P., Bauer, J.M., et al.: Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the european working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 39(4), 412–423 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morley, J.E., Abbatecola, A.M., Argiles, J.M., et al.: Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 12(6), 403–409 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Hage, R., Theunynck, D., Rocher, E., et al.: Geometric indices of hip bone strength in overweight and control elderly men. J. Med. Liban. 62(3), 150–155 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El Hage, R., Mina, F., Ayoub, M.L., et al.: Relative importance of lean mass and fat mass on bone mineral density in a group of Lebanese elderly men. J. Med. Liban. 60(3), 136–141 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taaffe, D.R., Villa, M.L., Holloway, L., et al.: Bone mineral density in older non-Hispanic Caucasian and Mexican-American women: relationship to lean and fat mass. Ann. Hum. Biol. 27(4), 331–344 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu, G.R., Araujo, A.B., Travison, T.G., et al.: Relative contributions of multiple determinants to bone mineral density in men. Osteoporos. Int. 20(12), 2035–2047 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck, T.J., Petit, M.A., Wu, G., et al.: Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women’s health initiative-observational study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24(8), 1369–1379 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Travison, T.G., Araujo, A.B., Esche, G.R., et al.: Lean mass and not fat mass is associated with male proximal femur strength. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23(2), 189–198 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards, M.H., Dennison, E.M., Aihie Sayer, A., et al.: Osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older age. Bone 80, 126–130 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pereira, F.B., Leite, A.F., de Paula, A.P.: Relationship between pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia and bone mineral density in elderly men. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 59(1), 59–65 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, T.J., Ruff, C.B., Warden, K.E., et al.: Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. Struct. Approach Invest Radiol. 25(1), 6–18 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beck, T.J., Broy, S.B.: Measurement of hip geometry-technical background. J. Clin. Densitom 18(3), 331–337 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bouxsein, M.L., Karasik, D.: Bone geometry and skeletal fragility. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 4(2), 49–56 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LaCroix, A.Z., Beck, T.J., Cauley, J.A., et al.: Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density? Osteoporos. Int. 21(6), 919–929 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reider, L., Beck, T.J., Hochberg, M.C., et al.: Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls. Osteoporos. Int. 21(5), 741–750 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaptoge, S., Beck, T.J., Reeve, J., et al.: Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23(12), 1892–1904 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melton III, L.J., Beck, T.J., Amin, S., et al.: Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 16(5), 460–467 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szulc, P., Duboeuf, F., Schott, A.M., et al.: Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos. Int. 17(2), 231–236 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leslie, W.D., Pahlavan, P.S., Tsang, J.F., et al.: Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort. Osteoporos. Int. 20(10), 1767–1774 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    El-Kaissi, S., Pasco, J.A., Henry, M.J., et al.: Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study. Osteoporos. Int. 16(10), 1299–1303 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crabtree, N.J., Kroger, H., Martin, A., et al.: Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European prospective osteoporosis study. Osteoporos. Int. 13(1), 48–54 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahlborg, H.G., Nguyen, N.D., Nguyen, T.V., et al.: Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20(10), 1820–1827 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nasr, R., Watelain, E., Pinti, A., et al.: Sarcopenia and hip structure analysis variables in a group of elderly men. J. Clin. Densitom. (2016, in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anitha, D., Lee, T.: Assessing bone quality in terms of bone mineral density, buckling ratio and critical fracture load. J. Bone. Metab. 21(4), 243–247 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheu, Y., Cauley, J.A., Patrick, A.L., et al.: Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29(1), 234–241 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duan, Y., Beck, T.J., Wang, X.F., et al.: Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J. Bone Miner. Res. 18(10), 1766–1774 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaptoge, S., Dalzell, N., Loveridge, N., et al.: Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. Bone 32(5), 561–570 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riad Nasr
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric Watelain
    • 3
    • 4
  • Antonio Pinti
    • 5
    Email author
  • Hayman Saddik
    • 1
  • Ghassan Maalouf
    • 6
  • Abdel-Jalil Berro
    • 1
    • 7
  • Abir Alwan
    • 1
    • 8
  • César El Khoury
    • 1
    • 5
  • Ibrahim Fayad
    • 1
  • Rawad El Hage
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationUniversity of BalamandEl-KouraLebanon
  2. 2.DeVisu - Design, Visuel, Urbain, EA 2445UVHCValenciennesFrance
  3. 3.CNRS, UMR 8201ValenciennesFrance
  4. 4.LAMIH-Département SHV, Université Lille Nord de France, UVHCValenciennesFrance
  5. 5.I3MTO, EA4708, Université d’OrléansOrléansFrance
  6. 6.Faculty of Medicine, Bellevue University Medical CenterSaint Joseph UniversityMansouriehLebanon
  7. 7.EA-3300, APEREUniversity of Picardie Jules VerneAmiensFrance
  8. 8.Laboratoire Mouvement Sport SantéUFR APSRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations