Advertisement

Geostatistics: Principles and Applications in Spatial Mapping of Soil Properties

  • Nirmal Kumar
  • N. K. Sinha
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environment book series (GEOTECH, volume 21)

Abstract

Soil properties show a high degree of spatial variability due to the combined effect of physical, chemical, or biological processes that operate within the soil profile with different intensities at different scales. Knowledge of spatial variability of soil properties in the form of spatial continuous surfaces is important for identifying suitable zones for agricultural land management. To accurately describe the spatial variability, a very intensive survey is required. These intensive surveys are labor- and time-consuming. Soil maps can also be viewed as a source of spatial information on soil properties. However, these maps are prepared using pedological and morphological studies of pedons and are themselves based on point observations. The soil physical and chemical properties may be found to vary within a soil map unit. These maps also lack the required information of all the soil properties. Another method to get a spatial continuous raster of soil properties is to correlate them with satellite data, particularly hyperspectral data. This method requires high computations and sophisticated methodologies. In such conditions, spatial interpolation methods provide tools to analyze the spatial variabilities of soil properties and provide a spatial continuous layer by estimating the values of unsampled sites using data from existing point observations within the same region. This chapter reviews some of the popular spatial interpolation techniques used in soil science.

Keywords

Geostatistics Spatial interpolation Spatial variability Soil properties 

References

  1. Amézquita E, Thomas RJ, Rao IM, Molina DL, Hoyos P (2004) Use of deep-rooted tropical pastures to build-up an arable layer through improved soil properties of an Oxisol in the Eastern Plains (Llanos Orientales) of Colombia. Agric, Ecosyst Environ 103:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TW, Darling DA (1954) A test of goodness-of-fit. J Am Stat Assoc 49:765–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong M (1989) Basic linear Geostatistics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti AU, Mulla DJ, Frazier BE (1991) Estimation of soil properties and wheat yields on complex eroded hills using geostatistics and thematic mapper images. Remote Sens Environ 37:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggar JW, Nielsen DR (1976) Spatial variability of the leaching characteristics of a field soil. Water Resour Res 12:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop TFA, McBratney AB (2001) A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps. Geoderma 103:49–60Google Scholar
  7. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford 333 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahn MD, Hummel JW, Brouer BH (1994) Spatial analysis of fertility for site-specific crop management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1240–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd acmsigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2016Google Scholar
  10. Collins FC, Bolstad PV (1996) A comparison of spatial interpolation techniques in temperature estimation, proceedings, third international conference/workshop on integrating GIS and environmental modeling, Santa Fe, NM. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  11. Cucunubá-Melo JL, Álvarez-Herrera JG, Camacho-Tamayo JH (2011) Identification of agronomic management units based on physical attributes of soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 11:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camacho-Tamayo JH, Sanabria YR, Santana LM (2013) Management units based on the physical properties of an Oxisol. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13(4):767–785Google Scholar
  13. Dinkins CP, Jones C (2008) Soil sampling strategies. A self-learning resource from MSU Extension. MT200803AG New 4/08Google Scholar
  14. Englund E, Weber D, Leviant N (1992) The effects of sampling design parameters on block selection. Math Geol 24:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flatman GT, Yfantis AA (1984) Geostatistical strategy for soil sampling: the survey and the census. Environ Monit Assess 4:335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resource evaluation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state of the art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris P, Fotheringham AS, Crespo R, Charlton M (2010) The use of geographically weighted regression for spatial prediction: an evaluation of models using simulated data sets. Math Geosci 42:657–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartkamp AD, De Beurs K, Stein A, White JW (1999) Interpolation techniques for climate variables. NRG-GIS series 99–01. Mexico City: CIMMYTGoogle Scholar
  20. Haruna SI, Nkongolo NV (2013) Variability of soil physical properties in a clay-loam soil and its implication on soil management practices. ISRN Soil Sci 2013:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hengl T, Heuvelink G, Stein A (2004) A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging. Geoderma 120(1):75–93Google Scholar
  22. Hengl T, Leenaars JGB, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG, Heuvelink GBM, Mamo T, Tilahun H, Berkhout E, Cooper M, Fegraus E, Wheeler I, Kwabena NA (2017) Soil nutrient maps of Sub-Saharan Africa: assessment of soil nutrient content at 250 m spatial resolution using machine learning. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 109:77–102Google Scholar
  23. Iqbal J, Thomasson JA, Jenkins JN, Owens PR, Whisler FD (2005) Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1338–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York 561 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Journel AG (1986) Constrained interpolation and qualitative information — the soft kriging approach. Math Geol 18:269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Junior WDC, Chagas CDS, Lagacherie P, Filho BC, Bhering SB (2014) Evaluation of statistical and geostatistical models of digital soil properties mapping in tropical mountain regions. Braz J Soil Sci 38:706–717Google Scholar
  27. Kumar S, Lal R, Liu DS (2012) A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock. Geoderma 189:627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J, Heap AD (2008) A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geosci Aust Rec 2008(/23):1–137Google Scholar
  29. Liu X, Clarke K, Herold M (2006) Population density and image texture: a comparison study. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McBratney AB, Odeh IOA, Bishop TFA, Dunbar MS, Shatar TM (2000) An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97:293–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meng Q, Liu Z, Borders BE (2013) Assessment of regression kriging for spatial interpolation – comparisons of seven GIS interpolation methods. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulla DJ (1997) Geostatistics, remote sensing and precision farming. In: Lake JV, Bock GR, Goode JA (eds) Precision agriculture: spatial and temporal variability of environmental quality. Wiley, Chichester, pp 100–114Google Scholar
  33. Negrieros J, Painho M, Aguilar F, Aguilar M (2010) Geographical information systems principles of ordinary kriging interpolator. J Appl Sci 10(11):852–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver MA, Webster R (2014) A tutorial guide to geostatistics: computing and modelling variograms and kriging. Catena 113:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng G, Bing W, Guangpo G, Guangcan Z (2013) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen based on GIS and geostatistics in a small watershed in a hilly area of northern China. PLoS One 8(12):e83592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reza SK, Nayak DC, Chattopadhyay T, Mukhopadhyay S, Singh SK, Srinivasan R (2016) Spatial distribution of soil physical properties of alluvial soils: a geostatistical approach. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:972–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ripley BD (1981) Spatial statistics. Wiley, New York 252 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2006) Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 50:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossiter DG (2012) A minimal introduction to geostatistics with R/gstat. University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science & Earth Observation (ITC), p 69Google Scholar
  40. Sağlam M, Öztürk HS, Erşahin S, Özkan Aİ (2011) Spatial variation of soil physical properties in adjacent alluvial and colluvial soils under ustic moisture regime. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 8:4261–4280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Maiti R (2016) Spatial analysis of soil properties using GIS based geostatistics models. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0160-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shukla AK, Behera SK, Lenka NK, Tiwari PK, Chandra P, Malik RS, Sinha NK, Singh VK, Patra AK, Chaudhary SK (2016) Spatial variability of soil micronutrients in the intensively cultivated Trans-Gangetic Plains of India. Soil Tillage Res 163:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shukla AK, Sinha NK, Tiwari PK, Prakash C, Behera SK, Lenka NK, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS, Majumdar K, Kumar A, Srivastava PC (2017) Spatial distribution and management zones for sulphur and micronutrients in Shiwalik Himalayan Region of India. Land Degrad Dev 28(3):959–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stacey KF, Lark RM, Whitmore AP, Milne AE (2006) Using a process model and regression kriging to improve predictions of nitrous oxide emissions from soil. Geoderma 135:107,117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stahl K, Moore RD, Floyer JA, Asplin MG, McKendry IG (2006) Comparison of approaches for spatial interpolation of daily air temperature in a large region with complex topography and highly variable station density. Agric For Meteorol 139:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuffour HO, Abubakari A, Bashagaluke JB, Djagbletey E (2016) Mapping spatial variability of soil physical properties for site-specific management. Int Res J Eng Technol 03:149–163Google Scholar
  48. Vauclin M, Viera SR, Vachaud G, Nielsen DR (1983) The use of co-kriging with limited field soil observations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vieira SR, Nielsen DR, Biggar JW (1981) Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1040–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wackernagel H (2003) Multivariate Geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer, Berlin 387 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wani M, Bhat M, Kirmani NA, Wani ZM (2013) Mapping of soil micronutrients in Kashmir agricultural landscape using ordinary kriging and indicator approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41(2):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster R, Burgess TM (1984) Sampling and bulking strategies for estimating soil properties in small regions. J Soil Sci 35:127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webster R, Oliver M (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester 271 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright MN, Ziegler A (2017) Ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. J Stat Softw 77(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu Y, Dong D, Duan G, Yu X, Yu Z, Huang W (2013) Geostatistical analysis of soil nutrients based on GIS and geostatistics in the typical plain and hilly-ground area of Zhongxiang, Hubei Province. Open J Soil Sci 03:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yates SR, Warrick AW (1987) Estimating soil water content using cokriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou F, Guo HC, Ho YS, Wu CZ (2007) Scientometric analysis of geostatistics using multivariate methods. Scientometrics 73:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nirmal Kumar
    • 1
  • N. K. Sinha
    • 2
  1. 1.ICAR- National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use PlanningNagpurIndia
  2. 2.ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil ScienceBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations