Advertisement

The Growing Block

  • Fabrice Correia
  • Sven Rosenkranz
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 395)

Abstract

In this chapter we reconstruct the original version of the Growing Block Theory of time first advanced by C. D. Broad, highlight its shortcomings, and propose an improved version of the theory. We show that this improved version of the theory is superior to two more recent attempts to capture the idea of the growing block. In Sect. 4.1 we critically review central passages from Broad’s Scientific Thought, identify core principles that give substance to the image of a growing block, delimited by an edge of becoming beyond which nothing exists, and diagnose a number of problems with Broad’s account. In Sect. 4.2 we then present a neater version of the theory that still incorporates central ideas of Broad’s, yet avoids those problems. In Sect 4.3 we critically review the accounts respectively advanced by M. Tooley and T. Button and conclude that our version of the theory fares much better.

Bibliography

  1. Bourne, C. (2006). A future for Presentism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broad, C. D. (1923). Scientific thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Broad, C. D. (1938). Examination of McTaggart’s philosophy (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Broad, C. D. (1959). A reply to my critics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of C. D. Broad (pp. 711–830). New York: Tudor Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Button, T. (2006). There’s no time like the present. Analysis, 66, 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Button, T. (2007). Every now and then, no-futurism faces no sceptical problems. Analysis, 67, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorr, C., & Goodman, J. (forthcoming). Diamonds are forever. In Noûs.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, K. (2013). The growing block, presentism and eternalism. In A. Bardon & H. Dyke (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of time (pp. 345–365). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oaklander, L. N. (2004). The ontology of time. Amherst/NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  10. Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sider, T. (2001). Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tallant, J. (2007). There have been, are (now), and will be lots of times like the present in the hybrid view of time. Analysis, 67, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tallant, J. (2011). There’s no future in no-futurism. Erkenntnis, 74, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tooley, M. (1997). Time, tense and causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrice Correia
    • 1
  • Sven Rosenkranz
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de PhilosophieUniversité de GenèveGenèveSwitzerland
  2. 2.ICREABarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Departament de FilosofiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations