Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Marta Božina Beroš
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

This book examined the case of two European agencies in the banking sector (the European Banking Authority and the Single Resolution Board) in order to unravel relationship dynamics of National Competent Authorities at agencies’ executive level. It argues that one of the most pressing issues both European agencies face is that of maintaining equality between different subsets of countries (Euro area vs. non-Euro area/Banking Union participants and outsiders). Against this background, this chapter not only summarizes the main findings but also offers a forward-looking perspective to these issues. It reflects on how existing governance mechanisms may be enhanced in order to create a level playing field for all Member States in shaping policy outputs.

Keywords

EBA SRB Functional equality Governance 

References

  1. Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for Autonomy? National Agencies in European Networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, T., De Francesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing, E. (2016). Transnational Beaurocratic Politics: An Institutional Rivalry Perspectiveon EU Network Governance. Public Administration, 94(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benz, A., Corcaci, A., & Doser, J. W. (2016). Unravelling Multilevel Administration. Patterns and Dynamics of Administrative Co-ordination in European Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 999–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busuioc, M. (2013a). Rule-Making by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope. European Law Journal, 19(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busuioc, M. (2013b). European Agencies-Law and Practices of Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu, I. H.-Y. (2016). Power and Accountability in the EU Financial Regulatory Architecture: Examining Inter-Agency Relations, Agency Independence and Accountability. In M. Andenas & G. Deipenbrock (Eds.), Regulating and Supervising European Financial Markets. More Risks than Achievements (pp. 67–103). Zurich: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Egeberg, M. (2006). Multilevel Union Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22(4), 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-level Agencies: New Executive Centre formation or Vehicles for National Control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2016). Agencification of the European Union Administration-Connecting the Dots. TARN Working Paper No. 1.Google Scholar
  11. European Parliament. (2013). Review of the New European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS) Pt. 1: The Work of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA), IP/A/ECON/ST/2012–23.Google Scholar
  12. Font, N. (2015). Policy Properties and Political influence in Post-Delegation: The Case of EU Agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HM Government. (2014). Review of the Balance of Competences Between the United Kingdom and the European Union. The Single Market: Financial Services and the Movement of Capital. Summer 2014, London.Google Scholar
  14. HM Treasury. (2013). UK Response to the Commission Services Consultation on the Review of the European System of Financial Supervision. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2013/esfs/contributions_en.htm
  15. Jordana, J., & Triviño-Salazar, J. C. (2017). European Union Agencies: A Transnational Logic? IBEI Working Papers 2017/54.Google Scholar
  16. Moloney, N. (2014). European Banking Union: Assessing Its Risks and Resilienece. Common Market Law Review, 51(6), 1609–1670.Google Scholar
  17. Quaglia, L., & Spendzharova, A. (2017). Post-Crisis Reforms in Banking: Regulators at the Interface Between Domestic and International Governance. Regulation and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruffing, E. (2015). Agencies Between Two Worlds: Information Asymmetry in Multi-level Policy-Making. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weismann, P. (2016). European Agencies and Risk Governance in EU Financial Market Law. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeitlin, J. (2016). EU Experimentalist Governance in Times of Crisis. West European Politics, 39(5), 1073–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Božina Beroš
    • 1
  1. 1.Juraj Dobrila University of PulaPulaCroatia

Personalised recommendations