Advertisement

Abdominal Hysterectomy

  • Thomas Keith Cunningham
  • Kevin Phillips
Chapter

Abstract

Hysterectomy was once the primary management for benign pathologies such as heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroid uterus. In recent years advances in medical therapy and ablation techniques commonly manage these conditions, and thus hysterectomies are now performed less frequently. As a result, only gynaecologists with the appropriate training, will perform hysterectomies. Each type of hysterectomy has its own set of individual risks and if not promptly addressed can result in litigation. This chapter discusses the main risks of performing hysterectomy whether laparoscopic or open and how to avoid litigation.

Keywords

Abdominal hysterectomy Laparoscopic hysterectomy Informed consent Patient assessment Litigation Ureteric injury Bladder injury 

References

  1. 1.
    Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD003677. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
  2. 2.
    NICE. Laparoscopic hysterectomy (including laparoscopic total hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) for endometrial cancer. 2010 Interventional procedures guidance 356.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NICE Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management. Clinical guideline [CG44] Published date: January 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Obtaining Valid Consent. London: RCOG; 2008. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/CGA6-15072010.pdf Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1473–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mäkinen J, Brummer T, Jalkanen J, Heikkinen AM, Fraser J, Tomás E, et al. Ten years of progress-improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996-2006: a longitudinal observation study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD006583. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4
  8. 8.
    Sutton CJG and Phillips K. Preventing Entry-Related Gynaecological Laparoscopic Injuries. RCOG Green-top Guideline No.49. 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jha SD, Rowland ST. Litigation in gynaecology. Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;16:51–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jha S, Coomarasamy A, Chan KK. Ureteric injury in obstetric and gynaecological surgery. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;6:203–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T. Adhesion-Related Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1162–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayeleke R, Mourad S, Marjoribanks J, Calis KA, Jordan V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD004637. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2
  13. 13.
    Barber EL, Neubauer NL, Gossett DR. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:609.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen NT, Cronan M, Braley S, Rivers R, Wolfe BM. Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(2):285–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS TrustHullUK

Personalised recommendations