Repro-Migration: Lessons from the Early Days of Cross-Border Migration Between Israel and Romania

  • Michal NahmanEmail author


What can the study of migration and reproduction together tell us about both conceptual arenas and sets of cultural practice? In this chapter, I juxtapose cross-border reproductive practices that occurred in 2002 with practices and imaginaries of border making, for the dual purposes of comparison and of deepening our knowledge of both theoretical ‘domains’ which I call ‘Repro-Migration’. The notion of going to ‘a country that is not mine’ for egg donation and having a baby ‘that is not mine’ are co-present in these stories. Thinking through the politics of race and borders, this chapter looks at how egg donation appeared in its early days in one of the places of earliest cross-border egg donation practice in order to help us reflect about its present day manifestations.


  1. Alcalay, A. (1993). After Jews and Arabs: Remaking Levantine culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (2000). The elusive embryo: How women and men approach new reproductive technologies. California: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharadwaj, A. (2008). Biosociality to bio-crossings: Encounters with assisted conception and embryonic stem cells in India. In S. Gibbon & C. Novas (Eds.), Genetics, biosociality and the social sciences: Making biologies and identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Carmeli, Y. (2002). Physiognomy, familism and consumerism: Preferences in donor insemination. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. B’Tselem. (2002a). IDF causes death of infant by preventing mother’s evacuation to hospital [online]. Available at Accessed 14 Sept 2017.
  6. B’Tselem. (2002b). IDF rubber bullet causes head injury to seven-month pregnant woman [online]. Available at Accessed 14 Sept 2017.
  7. Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (Eds.). (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Columbia: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, S. (1991). Ethnicity: Identity and difference. Radical America, 23(4), 9–20.Google Scholar
  10. Handelman, D. (2004). Nationalism and the Israeli state: Bureaucratic logic in public events. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  11. Inhorn, M. (2003). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion, and in vitro fertilisation in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Inhorn, M. C. (2015). Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF sojourns in global Dubai. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ivry, T. (1999, June). Reproduction as martial art. In International Institute of Sociology, Annual Conference. Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  14. Kahn, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kessler, S. J. (1998). Lessons from the Intersexed. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kroløkke, C. (2014). Eggs and euros: A feminist perspective on reproductive travel from Denmark to Spain. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 7(2), 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavie, S. (2011a). Mizrahi feminism and the question of Palestine. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 7(2), 56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavie, S. (2011b). Staying put: Crossing the Israel–Palestine border with Gloria Anzaldúa. Anthropology and Humanism, 36(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lock, M., & Kaufert, P. (2001). Menopause, local biologies, and cultures of aging. American Journal of Human Biology, 13(4), 494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mcneil, M. (1993a). Editorial: Procreation stories. Science as Culture, 17, 477–482.Google Scholar
  21. McNeil, M. (1993b). New reproductive technologies: Dreams and broken promises. Science as Culture, 3, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Motzafi-Haller, P. (2001). Scholarship, identity, and power: Mizrahi women in Israel. Signs, 26(3), 697–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Motzafi-Haller, P. (2004). Negotiating difference in Israeli scholarship: Towards a new feminist discourse. In A. Kemp et al. (Eds.), Israelis in conflict: Hegemonies, identities and challenges. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nahman, M. (2006). Materializing israeliness: Difference and mixture in transnational ova donation. Science as Culture, 15(3), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nahman, M. (2007). Synecdochic ricochets: Biosocialities in a Jerusalem IVF clinic. In S. Gibbon & C. Novas (Eds.), Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences: Making biologies and identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Nahman, M. (2013). Extractions: An ethnography of reproductive tourism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nahman, M. (2016). Reproductive tourism: Through the anthropological ‘reproscope’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shohat, E. (1989). Israeli cinema: East/west and the politics of representation. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  29. Speier, A. (2016). Fertility holidays: IVF tourism and the reproduction of whiteness. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strathern, M. (1992). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Teman, E. (2010). Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas Viscos: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health and Social SciencesUniversity of the West of England (UWE Bristol)BristolUK

Personalised recommendations