Surrogacy and Social Movements in India: Towards a Collective Conversation
This chapter is part of Sama’s attempt to advance more clarity and nuance on the vexed question of commercial surrogacy in India. It reflects thematically on interviews with activists and experts from key social movements in India on which surrogacy have a bearing. It problematises the themes of commercialisation, draws parallels with sex work, and child rights and provides a bioethical and public health perspective on the ethical and regulatory issues of surrogacy. The chapter concludes with a call to bring new perspectives and movements into conversation and collaboration so as to respond to the challenges posed by surrogacy.
- Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical Labor. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, J. (2017). Drug bioavailability. MSD Manuals [online]. Available at http://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/clinical-pharmacology/pharmacokinetics/drug-bioavailability. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2016). Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 [pdf]. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Surrogacy/Surrogacy%20(Regulation)%20Bill,%202016.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
- Qadeer, I. (1998). Reproductive health: A public health perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(41), 2675–2684.Google Scholar
- Qadeer, I., & John, M. E. (2009). The business and ethics of surrogacy. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 10–12.Google Scholar
- Reddy, S., & Qadeer, I. (2010). Medical tourism in India: Progress or predicament? Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 69–75.Google Scholar
- The Indian Express. (2014). Egg donor’s death: Internal bleeding, ovaries severely enlarged, says report [online]. Available at http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/egg-donors-death-internal-bleeding-ovaries-severely-enlarged-says-report/. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
- Zelizer, V. A. R. (1994). The social meaning of money: Pin money, paychecks, poor relief and other currencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar