Modeling Urbanization Perception: Emerging Topics on Hangzhou Future Sci-Tech City Development

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 830)

Abstract

The complexity of the study on urban systems poses the challenging problem of developing methodological approaches for analyzing and modeling social data, both from a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. This work presents the research conducted to explore the perception on the urban development of an high-tech zone which has been recently established in China, i.e. Hangzhou Future Sci-Tech City. We conducted field research and collected data to identify which topics, concepts and interpretative categories are embedded in the social discourses about urban development and to derive the network of relations typical of complex social systems. The results of these analyses suggest that the perception of the people interviewed is mostly of great appreciation for the economic development with some concerns on the negative effects of this development on the society and the environment.

Keywords

Urbanization Perception Structural Topic Models Network of relations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the EU-CHINA Research and Innovation Partnership, EuropeAid/135-587/DD/ACT/Multi EU Project: New pathways for sustainable urban development in China’s medium-sized cities (MEDIUM). This publication has received funding from the European Union under the External actions of the European Union - Grant Contract ICI+/2014/348-005. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao, P., Li, P.: Rethinking the relationship between urban development, local health and global sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 25, 14–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang, B., Xu, T., Shi, L.: Analysis on sustainable urban development levels and trends in China’ cities. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 868–880 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riffat, S., Powell, R., Aydin, D.: Future cities and environmental sustainability. Future Cities and Environ. 2, 1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu, F.: Emerging Chinese cities: implications for global urban studies. Prof. Geogr. 68(2), 338–348 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wei, Y.H.D.: Restructuring for growth in urban China: transitional institutions, urban development, and spatial transformation. Habitat Int. 36, 396–405 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolfin, M., Leonida, L., Outada. N.: Modeling human behavior in economics and social science. Phys. Life Rev. (2017, in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77–84 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grimmer, J., Stewart, B.: Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political documents. Poli. Anal. 21(3), 267–297 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, G., Feng, S., Jun, T.: Textual analysis and machine leaning: crack unstructured data in finance and accounting. J. Financ. Data Sci. 2(3), 153–170 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tvinnereim, E., Liu, X., Jamelske, E.M.: Public perceptions of air pollution and climate change: different manifestations, similar causes, and concerns. Clim. Change 140, 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reich, J., Tingley, D., Leder-Luis, J., Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M.: Computer-assisted reading and discovery for student generated text in massive open online courses. J. Learn. Anal. 2(1), 156–184 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anzoise, V.: Perception and (re)framing of urban environments: a methodological reflection toward sentient research. Vis. Anthropol. 30(3), 177–190 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Airoldi, E.M.: The structural topic model and applied social science. In: Neural Information Processing Society (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58(4), 1064–1082 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Airoldi, E.M.: A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111(515), 988–1003 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D.: STM: R-package for structural topic models. R package version 1.2.2 (2013). http://www.structuraltopicmodel.com

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Centre for Living TechnologyVeniceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and StatisticsCa’ Foscari University of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations