Advertisement

The Three Major Paradigms in Immunology

  • Walter Gottlieb Land
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the three major paradigms in modern immunology are briefly introduced. It begins with a brief description of the “self/nonself discrimination, Clonal Selection Theory,” proposed by Burnet in the mid-1990s. This model can be regarded as the foundation of modern immunology holding that any invading foreign agent, any nonself element, for example, bacteria and viruses, triggers an immune response. This traditional concept in immunology was complemented and modified by the “Pattern Recognition Theory” proposed by Janeway about 40 years later. This model correctly proposed that another immune system must exist preceding the adaptive immune system, called the innate immune system. As the core of this model, cells of this innate immune system express peculiar receptors, the “pattern recognition receptors” which possess the ability to recognize conserved molecular patterns derived from pathogens, the “pathogen-associated molecular patterns.” The recognition process then elicits an inflammatory anti-pathogen defense response. This model was again complemented and modified by Matzinger and Land now holding that the immune system does not discriminate between self and nonself to respond to nonself only, but its evolutionarily determined driving force is to recognize, to become alarmed by, and to respond to any form of cell stress and/or tissue injury including pathogen-caused infectious injury. Pattern recognition molecules of cells of the innate immune system perceive this dangerous injury via recognition of “damage-associated molecular patterns” to elicit an inflammatory antistress/injury defense response. In the presence of nonself or altered-self antigens, antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells get activated to initiate a specific adaptive immune response.

References

  1. 1.
    Burnet FM. A modification of Jerne’s theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1976;26:119–21. . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/816431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burnet F. The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lederberg J. Genes and antibodies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;546:183–7. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb21633.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pradeu T, Carosella ED. The self model and the conception of biological identity in immunology. Biol Philos. 2006;21:235–52. Available from: http://thomaspradeu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/PradeuCarosella_The-self-model-and-biological-identity.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 1953;172:603–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13099277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medzhitov R. Pattern recognition theory and the launch of modern innate immunity. J Immunol. 2013;191:4473–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bretscher P, Cohn M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science. 1970;169:1042–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4194660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafferty KJ, Cunningham AJ. A new analysis of allogeneic interactions. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1975;53:27–42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/238498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coutinho A, Möller G. Immune activation of B cells: evidence for “one non-specific triggering signal” not delivered by the Ig receptors. Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1974;53(suppl):131–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4136796.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janeway CA. Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1989;54(Pt 1):1–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2700931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janeway CA. The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self. Immunol Today. 1992;13:11–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1739426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medzhitov R, Janeway CA. Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science. 2002;296:298–300. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11951031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell. 1996;86:973–83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8808632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998;282:2085–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9851930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:335–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12524386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Land W, Schneeberger H, Schleibner S, Illner WD, Abendroth D, Rutili G, et al. The beneficial effect of human recombinant superoxide dismutase on acute and chronic rejection events in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Transplantation. 1994;57:211–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8310510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:991–1045. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8011301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Land WG, Messmer K. The innate immune system: its rediscovery before toll was described. Else Kröner-Fresenius Symp. 2013;4:24–8. Available from: http://www.karger.com?doi=10.1159/000346531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Land W, Messmer K. The impact of ischemia/reperfusion injury on specific and non-specific, early and late chronic events after organ transplantation. Transplant Rev. 1996;10:108–27. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955470X96800164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matzinger P. An innate sense of danger. Semin Immunol. 1998;10:399–415. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9840976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gallucci S, Lolkema M, Matzinger P. Natural adjuvants: endogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 1999;5:1249–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10545990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Land W. Postischemic reperfusion injury and allograft dysfunction: is allograft rejection the result of a fateful confusion by the immune system of danger and benefit? Transplant Proc. 1999;31:332–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10083132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Land W. Postischemic reperfusion injury to allografts: its impact on T-cell alloactivation via upregulation of dendritic cell-mediated stimulation, co-stimulation, and adhesion. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 1999;4:118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gallucci S, Matzinger P. Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001;13:114–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11154927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science. 2002;296:301–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11951032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Land W. Postischemic reperfusion injury to allografts - a case for “Innate immunity”? Eur Surg Res. 2002;34:160–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11867918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Land W. Allograft injury mediated by reactive oxygen species: from conserved proteins of Drosophila to acute and chronic rejection of human transplants. Part I: Demonstration of reactive oxygen species in reperfused allografts and their role in the initiation of. Transplant Rev. 2002;16:1192–204. Available from: http://www.transplantationreviews.com/article/S0955-470X(02)80015-5/pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Land W. Allograft injury mediated by reactive oxygen species: from conserved proteins of Drosophila to acute and chronic rejection of human transplants. Part II: Role of reactive oxygen species in the induction of the heat shock response as a regulator of innate. Transplant Rev. 2003;17:31–44. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955470X0380006X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Land W. Allograft injury mediated by reactive oxygen species: from conserved proteins of drosophila to acute and chronic rejection of human transplants. Part III: Interaction of (oxidative) stress-induced heat shock proteins with toll-like receptor-bearing cells. Transplant Rev. 2003;17:67–86. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955470X0380006X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Land WG. The role of postischemic reperfusion injury and other nonantigen-dependent inflammatory pathways in transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;79:505–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seong S-Y, Matzinger P. Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:469–78. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shi Y, Zheng W, Rock KL. Cell injury releases endogenous adjuvants that stimulate cytotoxic T cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:14590–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11106387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi Y, Rock KL. Cell death releases endogenous adjuvants that selectively enhance immune surveillance of particulate antigens. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:155–62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11754356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scaffidi P, Misteli T, Bianchi ME. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature. 2002;418:191–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12110890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shi Y, Evans JE, Rock KL. Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature. 2003;425:516–21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14520412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen C-J, Shi Y, Hearn A, Fitzgerald K, Golenbock D, Reed G, et al. MyD88-dependent IL-1 receptor signaling is essential for gouty inflammation stimulated by monosodium urate crystals. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2262–71. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16886064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ghaebi M, Nouri M, Ghasemzadeh A, Farzadi L, Jadidi-Niaragh F, Ahmadi M, et al. Immune regulatory network in successful pregnancy and reproductive failures. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:61–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matzinger P, Kamala T. Tissue-based class control: the other side of tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:221–30. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nri2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Land WG. Innate alloimmunity Part 1. Innate immunity and host defense. Baskent University, Ankara; Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich. 2011. Available from: ISBN 978-3-389967-737-9.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Land WG. Innate Alloimmunity Part 2: Innate immunity and allograft rejection. Baskent University, Ankara; Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich. 2011. Available from: ISBN 978-3-89967-738-6.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Matzinger P. The evolution of the danger theory. Interview by Lauren Constable, Commissioning Editor. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012;8:311–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22607177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Land WG. Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation: part I: evolution of innate immunity and oxidative allograft injury. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:60–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Land WG. Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation part II: potential of damage-associated molecular patterns to generate immunostimulatory dendritic cells. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:73–87. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22074784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Land WG. Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation part III: the quest for transplant tolerance via prevention of oxidative allograft injury and its consequences. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:88–102. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22000661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Land WG, Messmer K. The danger theory in view of the injury hypothesis: 20 years later. Front Immunol. 2012;3:349. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23189080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gallo PM, Gallucci S. The dendritic cell response to classic, emerging, and homeostatic danger signals. Implications for autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2013;4:138. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23772226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Land WG. Chronic allograft dysfunction: a model disorder of innate immunity. Biom J. 2013;36:209–28. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24225188.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Land WG, Agostinis P, Gasser S, Garg AD, Linkermann A. Transplantation and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Am J Transplant. 2016;16:3338–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27421829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Land WG, Agostinis P, Gasser S, Garg AD, Linkermann A. DAMP-induced allograft and tumor rejection: the circle is closing. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:3322–37. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27529775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pradeu T, Cooper EL. The danger theory: 20 years later. Front Immunol. 2012;3:287. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:279–89. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18340345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rock KL, Lai J-J, Kono H. Innate and adaptive immune responses to cell death. Immunol Rev. 2011;243:191–205. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zelenay S, Reis e Sousa C. Adaptive immunity after cell death. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:329–35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23608152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Baychelier F, Vieillard V. The modulation of the cell-cycle: a sentinel to alert the NK cells of dangers. Front Immunol. 2013;4:325. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rojas A, Pérez-Castro R, González I, Delgado F, Romero J, Rojas I. The emerging role of the receptor for advanced glycation end products on innate immunity. Int Rev Immunol. 2014;33:67–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24266871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ratsimandresy RA, Dorfleutner A, Stehlik C. An update on PYRIN domain-containing pattern recognition receptors: from immunity to pathology. Front Immunol. 2013;4:440. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Manjili MH. The adaptation model of immunity. Immunotherapy. 2014;6:59–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vénéreau E, Ceriotti C, Bianchi ME. DAMPs from cell death to new life. Front Immunol. 2015;6:422. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26347745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Garg AD, Galluzzi L, Apetoh L, Baert T, Birge RB, Bravo-San Pedro JM, et al. Molecular and translational classifications of DAMPs in immunogenic cell death. Front Immunol. 2015;6:588. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26635802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Elinav E, Strowig T, Kau AL, Henao-Mejia J, Thaiss CA, Booth CJ, et al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cell. 2011;145:745–57. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wagner H. Toll-like receptors in gastrointestinal diseases. Dig Dis. 2012;30(Suppl):74–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23075872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Saïd-Sadier N, Ojcius DM. Alarmins, inflammasomes and immunity. Biom J. 2012;35:437–49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442356.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hare D, Mossman KL. Novel paradigms of innate immune sensing of viral infections. Cytokine. 2013;63:219–24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23800788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tsai S-Y, Segovia JA, Chang T-H, Morris IR, Berton MT, Tessier PA, et al. DAMP molecule S100A9 acts as a molecular pattern to enhance inflammation during influenza A virus infection: role of DDX21-TRIF-TLR4-MyD88 pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003848. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24391503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Galluzzi L, Buqué A, Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;17:97–111. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yatim N, Cullen S, Albert ML. Dying cells actively regulate adaptive immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:262–75. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nri.2017.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Li K-P, Shanmuganad S, Carroll K, Katz JD, Jordan MB, Hildeman DA. Dying to protect: cell death and the control of T-cell homeostasis. Immunol Rev. 2017;277:21–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Land WG. Injury-induced allograft rejection: a rendezvous with evolution. Clin Transpl. 2013;2013:199–214.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Heil M, Land WG. Danger signals - damaged-self recognition across the tree of life. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:578. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schopenhauer A. All truth passes through three stages. Available from: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/arthurscho103608.html.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StrasbourgMolecular ImmunoRheumatology, Laboratory of Excellence TransplantexStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations