Advertisement

Prologue: The Term “Immunity” over the Course of Time

  • Walter Gottlieb Land
Chapter

Abstract

In the Prologue of Part I, the long way of the term “immunity” is briefly sketched, ranging from its first registered use in the context of health and disease 2000 years ago up to the description of the self/nonself discrimination theory in immunology in the mid-1990s. Originally, the term was mainly employed by non-physicians and understood as a passive exemption from diseases provoked by gods or demons. After the introduction of “variolation” and Jenner’s “inoculation” of cowpox in Europe in the eighteenth century, the term began to be widely used by physicians. Soon after, the germ theory of disease and the first immune mechanisms of defense were launched which promoted the use of the term. “Immunity” was now understood as a protective battle against the germs. At that time, however, at the late 1800s, two competing immunological theories were born: the “cellular theory” proposed by Metchnikoff in Russia holding that phagocytes play the dominant role in immune defense and the “humoral theory” proposed by Paul Ehrlich and Emil von Behring in Germany holding that a soluble substance in the body was mainly responsible for mediating immunity. Today it is known: both the “cellularists” and the “humoralists” were correct.

References

  1. 1.
    Silverstein A. A history of immunology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press/Elsevier; 2009. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/a-history-of-immunology/silverstein/978-0-12-370586-0.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenberg S. A concise history of immunology. The role of smallpox in the development of vaccination. 2005Available from: http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/pathophys/immunology/readings/ConciseHistoryImmunology.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Igea J. From the old immunitas to the modern immunity: do we need a new name for the immune system? Curr Immunol Rev. 2015;11:55–65. Available from: http://www.eurekaselect.com/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sawicki P. Remarks on some tax exempts in ancient Rome. Available from: http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/.
  5. 5.
    Roman Taxes [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unrv.com/economy/roman-taxes.php
  6. 6.
    Clergy in the Middle Ages | Middle Ages [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thefinertimes.com/Middle-Ages/clergy-in-the-middle-ages.html
  7. 7.
    Lucan M. De bello civili (Pharsalia) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.vanhamel.nl/codecs/De_bello_civili_(Pharsalia).
  8. 8.
    Haeser H. Historisch-pathologische Untersuchungen. 1841Available from: https://archive.org/details/historischpathol02haes.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riedel S. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;18:21–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16200144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blevins SM, Bronze MS. Robert Koch and the “golden age” of bacteriology. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e744–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20413340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakhtakia R. The legacy of Robert Koch: surmise, search, substantiate. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014;14:e37–41. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24516751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith KA. Louis pasteur, the father of immunology? Front Immunol. 2012;3:68. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22566949.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berche P. Louis Pasteur, from crystals of life to vaccination. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl):1–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22882766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tauber AI. Metchnikoff and the phagocytosis theory. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:897–901. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14625539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordon S. Elie Metchnikoff, the man and the myth. J Innate Immun. 2016;8:223–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26836137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luba V. Immunity: how elie metchnikoff changed the course of modern medicine. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press; 2016. Available from: http://www.lubavikhanski.com/.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mechnikov I. Nobel lecture: on the present state of the question of immunity in infectious diseases [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1908/mechnikov-lecture.html.
  18. 18.
    Simon J. Emil Behring’s medical culture: from disinfection to serotherapy. Med Hist. 2007;51:201–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17538695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    von Behring E. Biographical [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1901/behring-bio.html.
  20. 20.
    Paul Ehrlich The nobel prize in physiology or medicine 1908Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1908/.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ehrlich P. Croonian lecture: on immunity with special reference to cell life. Proc R Soc Lond. 1899;66:424–48. Available from: http://rspl.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rspl.1899.0121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strebhardt K, Ullrich A. Paul Ehrlich’s magic bullet concept: 100 years of progress. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:473–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silverstein AM. Autoimmunity versus horror autotoxicus: the struggle for recognition. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:279–81. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/86280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raju TN. The Nobel chronicles. 1972: Gerald M Edelman (b 1929) and Rodney R Porter (1917-85). Lancet (London, England). 1999;354:1040. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10501404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brent L. A history of transplantation immunology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 1997. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780121317706500237.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gowans JL, McGregor DD, Cowen DM. Initiation of immune responses by small lymphocytes. Nature. 1962;196:651–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13949634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StrasbourgMolecular ImmunoRheumatology, Laboratory of Excellence TransplantexStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations