Ethical Evaluation of International Regimes and Challenges for Scientific-Technological Cooperation in the Global South

Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 94)

Abstract

The current system of international regimes has made cooperation between States possible, appealing to rational self-interest and the compatibility of complementary interests, fundamentally in the field of world economy. However, these multilateral institutions have suffered serious ethical questions because the benefits they have produced for the global south have been marginal. As a result, these countries have sought to create their own institutional spaces to cooperate, especially in the field of science, technology and innovation (STI). This article attempts to recover the conceptual proposals of Professor Robert O. Keohane about the ethical value of international cooperation within the system of current regimes, extrapolating into the domains of international cooperation in STI to identify the biggest challenges for the global south; and, thus, try to understand the motivations and efforts that the countries of the South have made to achieve fairer institutional cooperation spaces based on South-South cooperation (SSC), under the aegis of the UN.

Keywords

International regimes Utilitarianism Theory of rights South-South cooperation Science and technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Keohane, R.: Después de la Hegemonía. Cooperación y Discordia en la Política Económica Mundial. Grupo Editor Latinoamericano. Colección Estudios Internacionales (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rawls, J.: Teoría de la Justicia. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1971)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beitz, C.: Justice and International Relations. Philos. Public Aff. 4(4), 360–389 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rawls, J.: Justicia como equidad. In: Justicia como equidad. Revista Española de Control Externo. Tecnos, Madrid, pp. 129–58 (1999). Cap II del libro “Justicia como equidad”Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelfini, A.: Posibilidades de la integración latinoamericana en condiciones de escasa interdependencia. Revista Signos Universitarios 53, 69–82 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ayllón, B.: La Cooperación Sur-Sur y Triangular. Subversión o adaptación de la cooperación internacional? Primera edn. IAEN, Quito (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de la Rosa, G.V.: La Teoría de la Elección Racional en las ciencias sociales. Sociológica 23(67), 221–236 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Troyjo, M.: Tecnología & Diplomacia. Desafios da Cooperacao Internacional no Campo Científico-Tecnológico. Aduaneiras, Sao Paulo (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmookler, J.: Invention and Economic Growth. 1a ed. (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malacalza, B.: International Cooperation in Science and Technology: Concepts, Politics and Dynamics in the case of Argentine-Brazilian Nuclear Cooperation. Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales: Contexto Internacional (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wagner, C., Yesril, A., Hassel, S.: International Cooperation in Research and Development: An Update to an Inventory of U.S. Government Spending. Reporte, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Santa Monica (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turekian, V.C., Macindoe, S., Copeland, D., Davis, L.S., Patman, R.G., Pozza, M.: The Emergence of Science Diplomacy. In: Science Diplomacy. New Day or a False Dawn? pp. 3–24. University of Otago, Otago (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flink, T., Schereiterer, U.: Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches. Sci. Public Policy 37(9), 665–677 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calestous, J., Cosmas, G., Allison, D., Audette, B.: Forging New Technology Alliances: The Role of South-South Cooperation. Cooperation South (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaillard, J.: North-South research partnership: is collaboration possible between unequal partners? Knowledge and policy. Int. J. Knowl. Transf. Utilization 7(2), 31–63 (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oregioni, M., López, M.: Cooperación Internacional en ciencia y tecnología. La voz de los investigadores. Rev. iberoam. cienc. tecnol. soc. 8(22) (2014). http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850-00132014000100004&script=sci_arttext
  17. 17.
    ISTIC: International Science, Technology and Innovation Center for South-South Cooperation. https://istic-unesco.org/index.php/features/module-positions. Accessed 17 July 2017
  18. 18.
    Ribeiro, M., Baiardi, A.: Contexto Internacional 36(2), 585–621 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Armada del EcuadorGuayaquilEcuador
  2. 2.Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPESangolquíEcuador
  3. 3.Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena – UPSELa LibertadEcuador
  4. 4.Algoritmi CentreMinho UniversityGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations