Framing of Crimean Annexation and Eastern Ukraine Conflict in Newspapers of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan in 2014

  • Katja LehtisaariEmail author
  • Aziz Burkhanov
  • Elira Turdubaeva
  • Jukka Pietiläinen


This chapter analyses the framing of annexation of Crimea by Russian Federation in March 2014 and conflict in Eastern Ukraine during the spring of 2014 in newspapers of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The focus is in possible linkage of Crimean annexation to relations between Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia, including the possibility of similar annexation of Northern Kazakhstan, which has large Russian majority. Findings include that the amount of coverage is rather small in official, state-published or sponsored newspapers while in privately owned newspapers, the amount and spectrum of coverage is wider. It seems also that (especially in Kazakhstan) the Kazakh-language papers are less controlled by the officials and therefore more varied in their views than Russian-language papers. In some private newspapers, the similarities of Northern Kazakhstan and Crimea are discussed while the state media report only the official version that the annexation is against international law but that the people of Crimea also have right to organize a referendum. In Kyrgyzstan, the coverage has broadly the same pattern, Kyrgyz-language privately owned newspapers being the most varied and critical in their views towards Russian policy in Ukraine.


  1. Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.Google Scholar
  2. Freedman, E. 2009. “When a Democratic Revolution Isn’t Democratic or Revolutionary: Press Restraints and Press Freedoms After Kyrgyzstan’s Tulip Revolution.” Journalism 10 (6): 843–61.Google Scholar
  3. Freedman, E. 2011. “Theoretical Foundations for Researching the Roles of the Press in Today’s Central Asia.” In After the Czars and Commissars: The Press in Post-Soviet Authoritarian Central Asia, edited by E. Freedman and R. Shafer. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freedman, E. 2012. Deepening Shadows: The Eclipse of Press Rights in Kyrgyzstan. Global Media and Communication 8 (1): 47–64.Google Scholar
  5. Freedman, E., and R. Shafer. 2014. “Contrasting Regional Portraits of Press Rights on Post-Soviet Terrain: The Baltics vs. The Caucasus and Central Asia.” Paper presented at the International Association for Media & Communication Research Hyderabad, India, July.Google Scholar
  6. Junisbai, B. 2011. “Oligarchs and Ownership: The Role of Financial-Industrial Groups in Controlling Kazakhstan’s ‘Independent’ Media.” In After the Czars and Commissars: The Press in Post-Soviet Authoritarian Central Asia, edited by E. Freedman and R. Shafer. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Junisbai, B., A. Junisbai, and N. Y. Fry. 2015. “Mass Media Consumption in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan: The View from Below.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 23 (3): 233–56.Google Scholar
  8. Juraev, A. 2002. “The Uzbek Mass Media Model: Analysis, Opinions, Problems.” Central Asia and the Caucasus 13 (1): 130–38.Google Scholar
  9. Kulikova, S., and G. Ibraeva. 2002. The Historical Development and Current Situation of the Mass Media in Kyrgyzstan. Occasional Paper 1, CIMERA.Google Scholar
  10. Kulikova, S. 2008. New Media in New Democracies: Perceptions of Good Governance Among Traditional and Internet-Based Media Users in Kyrgyzstan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  11. Kulikova, S., and D. D. Perlmutter. 2007. “Blogging Down the Dictator? The Kyrgyz Revolution and Samizdat Websites.” International Communication Gazette 69 (1): 29–50.Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Information and Communication of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2017. Accessed December 18, 2017.
  13. Ministry of Justice of Kyrgyz Republic. 2013. Elektronnaya baza dannykh sredstv massovoi informatsii KR. Accessed December 18, 2017.
  14. Nabers, D. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Pietiläinen, J. 2006. “Foreign News and Foreign Trade—What Kind of Relationship?” The International Communication Gazette 68 (3): 217–28.Google Scholar
  16. Wu, H. D. 2003. “Homogeneity Around the World? Comparing the Systemic Determinants of International News Flow between Developed and Developing Countries.” Gazette 65 (1): 9–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Lehtisaari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aziz Burkhanov
    • 2
  • Elira Turdubaeva
    • 3
  • Jukka Pietiläinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aleksanteri InstituteUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Graduate School of Public PolicyNazarbayev UniversityAstanaKazakhstan
  3. 3.Department of Journalism and Mass CommunicationsAmerican University of Central AsiaBishkekKyrgyzstan

Personalised recommendations