Advertisement

The Self/Other Space and Spinning the Net of Ontological Insecurities in Ukraine and Beyond: (Discursive) Reconstructions of Boundaries in the EU Eastern Partnership Countries Vis-à-Vis the EU and Russia

  • Susanne Szkola
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores Dirk Nabers’ notion of “disruptive processes” in the EU Eastern Partnership countries to scrutinize contested patterns of belonging amid continued talk of a “new Cold War” in light of the Ukraine Crisis. The arguments brought forward are that the crisis in Ukraine: (1) pointed to a case of ontological insecurity where the (narrated) existence and autobiography of Ukraine are challenged and reconfigured; (2) reflected a situation where, through mutual constitutions of othering/belonging, not only Ukraine was rendered ontologically insecure, but in particular Georgia as well; (3) led to a substantial refortification of already existing images of Self(s) and Other(s); and (4) showed that balancing images of (the) significant other(s) is a discursive strategy of rendering one ontologically secure again.

References

  1. Abdelal, R. 2009. Measuring Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, E. 1997. “Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations.” Millennium—Journal of International Studies 26 (2): 249–77.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, M. G., M. B. Brewer, and R. K. Hermann. 1999. “Images and Affect: A Functional Analysis of Out-Group Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (1): 78–93.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, M. G., S. Levin, and P. J. Henry. 2005. “Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images.” Political Psychology 26 (1): 27–45.Google Scholar
  5. Allison, R. 2013. Russia, the West, and Military Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, B. R. 1996. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Ashmore, R. D., Lee J. Jussim, and D. Wilder. 2001. Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Balzacq, T. 2011. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. PRIO New Security Studies. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Balzacq, T. 2015. “The ‘Essence’ of Securitization: Theory, Ideal Type, and a Sociological Science of Security.” International Relations 29 (1): 103–13.Google Scholar
  10. Barnett, M., and R. Duvall. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (01): 39–75.Google Scholar
  11. Buzan, B. 1991. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd ed. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Buzan, B., and L. Hansen. 2007. International Security. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Buzan, B., and O. Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buzan, B., Ole Wæver, and J. d. Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, D. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Caucasus Research Resource Centers. 2013. “Caucasus Barometer”: Caucasus Barometer 2013 Regional Dataset. http://www.crrccenters.org/caucasusbarometer. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  17. Chernobrov, D. 2016. “Ontological Security and Public (Mis)Recognition of International Crises: Uncertainty, Political Imagining, and the Self.” Political Psychology 37 (5): 581–96.Google Scholar
  18. Coene, F. 2016. Euro-Atlantic Discourse in Georgia: The Making of Georgian Foreign and Domestic Policy After the Rose Revolution. Oxon: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Connolly, W. E. 1985. “Taylor, Foucault, and Otherness.” Political Theory 13 (3): 365–76.Google Scholar
  20. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). 2017. Global Conflict Tracker: Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. https://www.cfr.org/interactives/global-conflict-tracker#!/conflict/nagorno-karabakh-conflict. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  21. Danii, O., and M. Mascauteanu. 2011. “Moldova Under the European Neighbourhood Policy: ‘Falling Between Stools’.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (1): 99–119.Google Scholar
  22. Delehanty, W. K., and B. J. Steele. 2009. “Engaging the Narrative in Ontological (In)Security Theory: Insights from Feminist IR.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (3): 523–40.Google Scholar
  23. Deutsch, K. W. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ejdus, F. 2017. “Critical Situations, Fundamental Questions and Ontological Insecurity in World Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0083-3. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  25. Festinger, L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Finlay, D. J., O. R. Holsti, and R. R. Fagen. 1967. Enemies in Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  27. Finley, Simon A. 2010. “An Identity-Based Understanding of Intergroup Conflict.” Contemporary Justice Review 13 (4): 425–41.Google Scholar
  28. Flockhart, T. 2005. “Critical Junctures and Social Identity Theory: Explaining the Gap Between Danish Mass and Elite Attitudes to Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (2): 251–71.Google Scholar
  29. Freire, M. R., and R. E. Kanet. 2012. Russia and Its Near Neighbours: Identity, Interests and Foreign Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Gallup Survey. 2015. Eastern Europeans, CIS Residents See Russia, U.S. as Threats. http://news.gallup.com/poll/190415/eastern-europeans-cis-residents-russia-threats.aspx. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  31. Gaufman, E. 2017. Security Threats and Public Perception. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hagström, L., and K. Gustafsson. 2015. “Japan and Identity Change: Why It Matters in International Relations.” The Pacific Review 28 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  34. Harnisch, S. 2011. Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Haukkala, H. 2010. The EU–Russia Strategic Partnership: The Limits of Post-sovereignty in International Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Hopf, T. 2008. Russia’s European Choice, 1st ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Hopf, T., and B. B. Allan. 2016. Making Identity Count. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Huysmans, J. 1998. “Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier”. European Journal of International Relations 4 (2): 226–55.Google Scholar
  39. Independent Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS). 2016. Friends and Foes of Belarus, June. http://www.iiseps.org/?p=4793&lang=en. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  40. International Republican Institute (IRI). 2017a. Public Opinion Survey Residents of Moldova. http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/iri_moldova_poll_march_2017.pdf. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  41. Jerez-Mir, M., J. Real-Dato, and R. Vázquez-García. 2009. “Identity and Representation in the Perceptions of Political Elites and Public Opinion: A Comparison Between Southern and Post-communist Central-Eastern Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (6): 943–66.Google Scholar
  42. Katzenstein, P. J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kiev International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). 2017. Changes in the Attitude of the Population of Ukraine Toward Russia and of the Population of Russian Toward Ukraine. http://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=680&page=2. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  44. Korosteleva, E. 2017. “Putting the EU Global Security Strategy to Test: ‘Cooperative Orders’ and Othering in EU–Russia Relations.” International Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0128-7. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  45. Korostelina, K. V. 2003. “The Multiethnic State-Building Dilemma. National and Ethnic Minorities’ Identities in the Crimea.” National Identities 5 (2): 141–59.Google Scholar
  46. Korostelina, K. V. 2007. Social Identity and Conflict: Structures, Dynamics, and Implications, 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Korostelina, K. V. 2014. Constructing the Narratives of Identity and Power: Self-imagination in a Young Ukrainian Nation. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  48. Kteily, N., G. Hodson, and E. Bruneau. 2016. “They See Us as Less than Human: Metadehumanization Predicts Intergroup Conflict via Reciprocal Dehumanization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110 (3): 343–70.Google Scholar
  49. Lupovici, A. 2012. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel’s Unilateral Steps Towards the Palestinians.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 809–33.Google Scholar
  50. Made, V., and A. Sekarev. 2011. The European Neigbourhood After August 2008. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.Google Scholar
  51. McSweeney, B. 1996. “Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School.” Review of International Studies 22 (1): 81–93.Google Scholar
  52. Mitzen, J. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–70.Google Scholar
  53. Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. Thinking in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Mälksoo, M. 2015. “‘Memory Must Be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security.” Security Dialogue 46 (3): 221–37.Google Scholar
  55. Nabers, D. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. Houndsmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Neumann, I. B. 1992. “Identity and Security.” Journal of Peace Research 29 (2): 221–26.Google Scholar
  57. Rumelili, B. 2015a. Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Rumelili, B. 2015b. “Identity and Desecuritisation: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1): 52–74.Google Scholar
  59. SIPRI. 2016. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  60. Schumacher, T., A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber. 2018. The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Steele, B. J. 2005. “Ontological Security and the Power of Self-identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War.” Review of International Studies 31 (3): 519–40.Google Scholar
  62. Steele, B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Stern, M. 2005. Naming Security—Constructing Identity: “Mayan women” in Guatemala on the Eve of “Peace”. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Stryker, S. 2008. “From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond.” Annual Review of Sociology 34 (1): 15–31.Google Scholar
  65. Subotić, J. 2015. “Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (4): 610–27.Google Scholar
  66. Szkola, S. 2017. “Discursive Reconstructions of Boundaries in the South Caucasus Countries vis-à-vis the EU and Russia and the Crux of Securitization.” UPTAKE Working Paper No. 5. Available at: http://www.uptake.ut.ee/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/05_szkola.pdf.
  67. Tocci, N. 2017. “A Crisis of Perception and Reality in EU–Russia Relations.” http://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/crisis-of-perception-and-reality/. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  68. Weisel, O., and R. Böhm. 2015. “‘Ingroup Love’ and ‘Outgroup Hate’ in Intergroup Conflict Between Natural Groups.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 60 (1): 110–20.Google Scholar
  69. White, S., and V. Feklyunina. 2014. Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: The Other Europes. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Whitman, R. G., and S. Wolff, eds. 2010. The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective: Context, Implementation and Impact. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Williams, M. C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511–31.Google Scholar
  72. World Values Survey. Wave 5, 2005–2009 Official Aggregate v.20140429. www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Accessed January 28, 2018.
  73. World Values Survey Association. Wave 6, 2010–2014 Official Aggregate v.20150418. www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Accessed January 28, 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Szkola
    • 1
  1. 1.Brussels School of International StudiesUniversity of KentBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations