Advertisement

Minimally Invasive Radical Cystectomy and Its Role and Future in Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients. Myth or Reality?

  • Omar M. Aboumarzouk
  • Piotre L. Chlosta
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the improvements in surgical technique, open radical cystectomy (ORC) is still associated with significant early and late complications rates even when performed in referral centres by experienced surgeons. Therefore, numerous centres across the world have incorporated a minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopic (LRC) and robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) as a viable alternative for selected patients. LRC showed to be feasible and to provide better intraoperative outcomes such as less blood loss at the cost of higher operative times. One of the major concerns regards its steep learning curve. On the other hand, RRC showed to be able to reduce this learning curve and to lead to better intra- and post-operative outcomes. However, these data are mainly based on retrospective series and should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, long-term oncological outcomes of patients treated either with LRC or RRC are still unknown and awaited.

Keywords

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy Robotic radical cystectomy Minimally invasive surgery Complications 

References

  1. 1.
    Fergany A. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Arab J Urol. 2012;10(1):40–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stein JP, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prout GR, Marshall VF. The prognosis with untreated bladder tumors. Cancer. 1956;9(3):551–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cathelineau X, Jaffe J. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion: what is the optimal technique? Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17(2):93–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayn MH, et al. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2010;58(2):197–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonsson MN, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):1066–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee R, et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1886–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Redorta JP, Gaya JM, Breda A, et al. Robotic cystectomy versus open cystectomy: are we there yet. Eur Urol. 2010;S9:433–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith AB, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(1):17–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stein JP, Skinner DG. Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a standard procedure. World J Urol. 2006;24(3):296–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hosseini A, et al. Robotic cystectomy: surgical technique. BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):962–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ng CK, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):274–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Challacombe BJ, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):767–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irwin BH, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: current status, outcomes, and patient selection. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2009;10(3–4):243–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a 5-year review of a single institute’s operative data and complications and a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38(3):330–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carvalhal EF, Gill IS. Laparoscopic cystectomy: indications and limitations. Arch Esp Urol. 2002;55(6):721–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aron M, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2007;100(2):455–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khan MS, et al. Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. Urology. 2011;77(2):357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berger A, Aron M. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(2):167–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonzalez ER, Garcia GJ, Lorenzo LM. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Clin Trans Oncol. 2009;11:799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rassweiler J, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with and without orthotopic bladder replacement. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(2):78–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Challacombe BJ, Rose K, Dasgupta P. Laparoscopic radical and partial cystectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1(4):188–95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chade DC, et al. Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches. J Urol. 2010;183(3):862–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hemal AK. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10(1):45–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single institute comparative analysis. Urol Int. 2013;91(1):109–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer. J Endourol. 2013;27(9):1083–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Castillo OA, Vitagliano G, Vidal-Mora I. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. The new gold standard for bladder carcinoma? Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62(9):737–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chlosta P, et al. Is pure laparoscopic radical cystectomy still an attractive solution for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Urol Int. 2010;85(3):291–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keim JL, Theodorescu D. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Sci World J. 2006;28(6):2560–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith AB, Raynor MC, Pruthi RS. Peri- and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ishii H, et al. Robotic or open radical cystectomy, which is safer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abraham JB, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1473–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Puppo P, Naselli A. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Where do we stand? Arch Esp Urol. 2010;63(7):508–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Basillote JB, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: a comparison with the open approach. J Urol. 2004;172(2):489–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gregori A, et al. A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007;79(3):127–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guillotreau J, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Urol. 2009;181(2):554–9; discussion 559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ha US, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for the management of bladder cancer: mid-term oncological outcome. Int J Urol. 2010;17(1):55–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haber GP, Crouzet S, Gill IS. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2008;54(1):54–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hautmann RE. The oncologic results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy are not (yet) equivalent to open cystectomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19(5):522–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang J, et al. Compare of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;46(24):1870–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Porpiglia F, et al. Open versus laparoscopy-assisted radical cystectomy: results of a prospective study. J Endourol. 2007;21(3):325–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang SZ, et al. Comparison of surgical stress response to laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2010;28(4):451–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: neobladder or ileal conduit, debate still goes on. Cent Eur J Urol. 2014;67(1):9–15.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hemal AK, Kolla SB. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2340–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: oncological outcomes at up to 5 years. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):137–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Johar RS, et al. Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):52–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ahmed K, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):340–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pruthi RS, Smith A, Wallen EM. Evaluating the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. J Endourol. 2008;22(11):2469–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ramírez Backhaus M, et al. Learning laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Leipzig program. Analysis of the training module program. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33(3):290–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Raza SJ, et al. Oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with minimum 5-year follow-up: The Roswell Park Cancer Institute Experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66(5):920–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dasgupta P, et al. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy: short to medium-term oncologic and functional outcomes. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(11):1709–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hayn MH, et al. Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):882–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Elhage O, Keegan J, Challacombe B, et al. A comparative analysis of open, laparoscopic and robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol Suppl. 2008;7:317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Choudhury SM, et al. Oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1679–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Snow-Lisy DC, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer long-term oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):193–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, Celia A, DeStefani S, Grande M, Rivalta M, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: an Italian survey. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1308–11. Epub 2007 Feb 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar M. Aboumarzouk
    • 1
  • Piotre L. Chlosta
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Glasgow School of Life SciencesGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of UrologyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations