Performances of Emerging Stock Exchanges During the Fed’s Tapering Announcements

  • Onur EnginarEmail author
  • Mehmet Baha Karan
  • Göknur Büyükkara
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


This paper investigates abnormal returns of 19 emerging market equity portfolios during the Fed’s tapering period. Event study methodology is used during the early Fed’s announcements at 2013. The aim of the study is to evaluate both the event study methodology and abnormal return performance of the emerging market stock exchanges during tapering period. The authors also check for abnormal volatility during tapering announcements, specifying it with GARCH (1,1) model. The results indicate that, together with China and Greece, the fragile five economies are differentiated from the rest of the emerging markets during tapering announcements. Moreover, the striking result that the authors see is Turkey is affected more negatively than any other fragile five members in this period. Yet, the authors did not find any significant abnormal volatility effect brought by tapering announces. In addition, the authors find emerging markets are not semi-strong form efficient during tapering period.


Event study Abnormal return Fed’s tapering Emerging markets 


  1. Ahmed, S. C. (2017). International financial spillovers to emerging market economies: How important are economic fundamentals? Journal of International Money and Finance, 76, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenman, J., Binici, M., & Hutchison, M. M. (2014). The transmission of Federal Reserve tapering news to emerging financial markets (No. w19980). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, T. G. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank of England. (2016, June 1). Quantitative easing – injecting money into the economy. Retrieved from Scholar
  5. Bhattarai, S. C. (2015). Effects of US quantitative easing on emerging market economies. Retrieved from
  6. Binder, J. (1998). The event study methodology since 1969. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehmer, E., Masumeci, J., & Poulsen, A. B. (1991). Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance. Journal of Financial Economics, 30(2), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouraoui, T. (2015). The effect of reducing quantitative easing on emerging markets. Applied Economics, 47(15), 1562–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman, D. L. (2015). US unconventional monetary policy and transmission to emerging market economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 55, 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, S. J. (1980). Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, S. J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, J. M. (2016, June 1). Spillovers from United States monetary policy on emerging markets: Different this time? Retrieved from
  15. Díez, F. J. (2014). The emerging market economies in times of taper-talk and actual tapering. Current Policy Perspectives No. 14-6.Google Scholar
  16. Eichengreen, B., & Gupta, P. (2014). Tapering talk: The impact of expectations of reduced Federal Reserve security purchases on emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 25, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fama, E. F. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (2016, March 15). FRBSF Economic Letter. Retrieved from
  19. Godfrey, L. G. (1978). Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 40, 1293–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, P. R. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH (1, 1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), 873–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IMF. (2014). IMF Working Paper No:240.Google Scholar
  22. Ito, M. N. (2014). International stock market efficiency: A non-bayesian time-varying model approach. Applied Economics, 46(23), 2744–2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karafiath, I., & Spencer, D. E. (1991). Statistical inference in multiperiod event studies. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1(4), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuepper, J. (2016, March 20). What are the fragile five? Retrieved from
  25. Lavigne, R. S. (2014). Spillover effects of quantitative easing on emerging-market economies. Bank of Canada Review, 2014, 23–33.Google Scholar
  26. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.Google Scholar
  27. Mishra, P., Moriyama, K., & N’Diaye, P. (2014). Impact of Fed tapering announcements on emerging markets. IMF Working Paper No. 14/109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan Stanley. (2016, May 20). Fx pulse. Retrieved from
  29. Rai, V., & Suchanek, L. (2014). The effect of the Federal Reserve’s tapering announcements on emerging markets. Bank of Canada WP.Google Scholar
  30. Sahay, R., Arora, V., Arvanitis, T., Faruqee, H., N’Diaye, P., & Griffoli, T. M. (2014). Emerging market volatility: Lessons from the taper tantrum. IMF Staff Discussion Notes.Google Scholar
  31. Savickas, R. (2003). Event-induced volatility and tests for abnormal performance. Journal of Financial Research, 26(2), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schipper, K., & Thompson, R. (1983). The impact of merger-related regulations on the shareholders of acquiring firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 184–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Onur Enginar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet Baha Karan
    • 1
  • Göknur Büyükkara
    • 1
  1. 1.Hacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations