Advertisement

From Sensing to Sense-Making: Assessing and Visualizing Ship Operational Limitations in the Canadian Arctic Using Open-Access Ice Data

  • Mark A. Stoddard
  • Laurent Etienne
  • Ronald Pelot
  • Melanie Fournier
  • Leah Beveridge
Chapter
Part of the WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs book series (WMUSTUD, volume 7)

Abstract

Vessels planning a passage in the Canadian Arctic face many risks, most notably from ice, extreme weather, remoteness, and uncharted or poorly charted bathymetry. For ship operators who view the Arctic as a relatively untouched area of opportunity, the desire to operate vessels in the Arctic brings new challenges and risks. This study introduces the Polar Operational Limitations Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS) and demonstrates its use for assessing ship operational limitations using open-access historical ice information. The analysis of ship operational limitations in ice was aided by the construction of POLARIS scenario risk maps which were clearly demonstrated as a useful tool to support the strategic appraisal of ice conditions. Lastly, several use cases are provided to demonstrate how POLARIS and historical ice information can be used to support the strategic appraisal of ship operational limitations in ice.

Keywords

Sense-making Ice data Canadian Arctic Operational limit POLARIS Ship classification Statistical aggregation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, exactEarth Ltd., the German Ministry of Economy and Technology, and Airbus Defence & Space.

References

  1. Canadian Coast Guard. (2012). Ice navigation in Canadian waters: Navigation in ice covered waters. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Canadian Ice Service. (2009). Canadian Ice Service Arctic regional sea ice charts in SIGRID-3 format, (2007–2014). Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center.Google Scholar
  3. Etienne, L., & Pelot, R. (2013, June). Simulation of maritime paths taking into account ice conditions in the Arctic. In R. Devillers, C. Lee, R. Canessa, & A. Sherin (Eds.), CoastGIS conference 2013: Monitoring and adapting to change on the coast. 11th international symposium for GIS and computer cartography for coastal zone management (p. 116). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  4. Higginbotham, J., & Charron, A., & Manicom, J. (2012, November). Canada – US Arctic Marine Corridors and Resource Development (Policy Brief No 24). The Centre for International Governance Innovation. Retrieved from www.cigionline.org/publications
  5. Howell, S. E. L., & Yackel, J. J. (2004). A vessel transit assessment of sea ice variability in the western Arctic, 1969–2002: Implications for ship navigation. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lasserre, F. (2011). Arctic shipping routes: From the Panama myth to reality. International Journal, 66(4), 793–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maritime Safety Committee. (2014a). POLARIS – proposed system for determining operational limitations in ice. International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), International Martime Organization.Google Scholar
  8. Maritime Safety Committee. (2014b). Technical background to POLARIS. International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  9. National Snow and Ice Data Centre. (2015a). Format for gridded sea ice information (SIGRID). Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center.Google Scholar
  10. National Snow and Ice Data Centre. (2015b). Downwardly mobile. Arctic sea ice news and analysis. Retrieved July 8, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. O’Rourke R (2010) Changes in the Arctic: Background and issues for congress (7-5700, R41153, p. 13). Congressional Research Service, Retrieved July 8, 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Okabe, A., Boots, B., & Sugihara, K. (1992). Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, C. L., & Stephenson, S. R. (2013). New trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. In E. S. Mosley-Thompson (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) (Vol. 110, p. E1191). Retrieved July 28, 2015, from www.pnas.org
  14. Snider, D. (2012). Polar ship operations: A practical guide. London: The Nautical Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Somanathan, S., Flynn, P. C., & Szymanski, J. K. (2007). Feasibility of a sea route through the Canadian Arctic. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9, 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stoddard, M. A., Etienne, L., Fournier, M., Pelot, R., & Beveridge, L. (2016). Making sense of Arctic maritime traffic using the polar operational limits assessment risk indexing system (POLARIS). In IOP Conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 34, 012034, p 9).Google Scholar
  17. Transport Canada. (1998). Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System (AIRSS) Standards (TP 12259E). Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Transport Canada. (2003). Arctic Ice Regime Shipping System (AIRSS): A pictorial guide (TP 14044E). Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Vihma, T. (2014). Effects of Arctic sea ice decline on weather and climate: A review. Surveys in Geophysics, 35, 1175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9284-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson, K. J., Falkingham, J., Melling, H., & De Abreu, R. (2004). Shipping in the Canadian Arctic: Other possible climate change scenarios. In Proceedings of IGARSS’04: Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Anchorage, Alaska, September 2004 (Vol. 3, p. 1853). New York: IEEE International.Google Scholar
  21. World Meteorological Organization. (2004). SIGRID-3: A vector archive format for sea ice charts (JCOMM Technical Report No. 23, WMO/TD-No. 1214). Retrieved October 10, 2016, from ftp://ftp.wmo.int/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Stoddard
    • 1
  • Laurent Etienne
    • 2
  • Ronald Pelot
    • 1
  • Melanie Fournier
    • 1
  • Leah Beveridge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of Planning and EnvironmentUniversity of ToursToursFrance

Personalised recommendations