Advertisement

Film and Digital Media Production in Schools

  • Michelle Cannon
Chapter

Abstract

Further studies of creative work with young literate media practitioners are drawn from:
  1. (a)

    an international annual film education programme co-ordinated by The British Film Institute and the Cinémathèque française, premised on the practical and aesthetic composition of film language

     
  2. (b)

    innovative approaches to English and Drama Initial Teacher Training at the UCL, Institute of Education, involving playful moving image production and imaginative sensibilities

     
  3. (c)

    pragmatic strategies for teaching English in a South London secondary, featuring co-production of film focussed on honing personal critical response and understandings of authorial choice. Ethnographic descriptions of these social worlds are accompanied by commentaries on the contexts and ‘conditions of possibility’ that both constrain and enable participants’ agency within institutional confines.

     

Bibliography

  1. Back, L. (2013). The Art of Listening. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Barrs, M., & Horrocks, S. (2014). Educational Blogs and Their Effects on Pupils’ Writing. CFBT (Centre for British Teachers) & LCLC (London Connected Learning Centre).Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, R. (1979). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  4. Bazalgette, C. (2012). Key Findings of the Persistence of Vision: Animation and Poetry Project [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.themea.org.uk/archive/persistence-of-visionanimation-and-poetry-in-primary-schools/.
  5. Bazalgette, C., & Staples, T. (1995). Unshrinking the kids: Children’s cinema and the family film. In C. Bazalgette & D. Buckingham (Eds.), In Front of the Children: Screen Entertainment and Young Audiences (pp. 92–108). London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Belshaw, D. (2012). What is Digital Literacy? A Pragmatic Investigation [online]. PhD Thesis, Durham University, Durham. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://neverendingthesis.com.
  7. Bergala, A. (2002). L’hypothèse cinéma. Petit traité de transmission du cinéma à l’école et ailleurs. Paris: Cahiers du cinéma.Google Scholar
  8. Bergala, A., Whittle, M., & Bachmann, A. (2016). The Cinema Hypothesis—Teaching Cinema in the Classroom and Beyond. Vienna: Austrian Film Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment [online]. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bryer, T., Lindsay, M., & Wilson, R. (2014). A take on a Gothic poem: Tablet film-making and literary texts. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 21(3), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burn, A., Potter, J., & Reid, M. (2014). Media arts, digital culture and education—Guest editorial [online]. Media Education Research Journal, 5(1), 5–14. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://merj.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/MERJ_5.1_Introduction.pdf.
  14. Burnett, C. (2011a). The (im)materiality of educational space: Interactions between material, connected and textual dimensions of networked technology use in schools. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(3), 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnett, C. (2011b). Shifting multiple spaces in classrooms: An argument for investigating learners’ boundary-making around digital networked texts [online]. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(3). Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/uploads/1/3/6/8/136889/jlt_v12_3_burnett.pdf.
  16. Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). The (im)materiality of literacy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 90–103.Google Scholar
  17. Cannon, M., Bryer, T., & Lindsey, M. (2014). Media production and disruptive innovation: Exploring the interrelations between children, tablets, teachers and texts in subject English settings. Media Education Research Journal, 5(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
  18. Cousins, M. (2012). The Story of Film. London: Pavilion Books.Google Scholar
  19. Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretive Interactionism (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1997/1938). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  21. Eisner, E. (2005/1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Reimagining Schools (pp. 150–162). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. ESRO. (2015). Children’s Media Lives [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/childrens-media-lives-year-1/childrens_media_lives_report_FINAL1.pdf.
  23. FLAG (Film Literacy Advisory Group). (2015). A Framework for Film Education [online]. London: British Film Institute. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/ bfi-a-framework-for-film-education-brochure-2015-06-12.pdf.
  24. Gee, J. P. (2011/1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, K. (2006). A Biographic researcher in pursuit of an aesthetic: The use of arts-based (re)presentations in ‘performative’ dissemination of life stories [online]. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(1), 66–85. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume3/QSR_2_1_Jones.pdf.
  27. Lanham, R. A. (1994). The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, E., & Noppe-Brandon, S. (2009). Imagination First: Unlocking the Power of Possibility. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, A. (2006). A European framework for digital literacy [online]. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 151–161. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.idunn.no/dk/2006/02/a_european_framework_for_digital_literacy.
  31. McIntyre, J., & Jones, S. (2014). Possibility in impossibility? Working with beginning teachers of english in times of change. English in Education, 48(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKee, H. (2005). Richard Lanham’s the electronic word and AT/THROUGH oscillations [online]. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 5(1), 117–129. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.users.miamioh.edu/mckeeha/lanham_review.pdf.
  33. Mee, J., & Gittings, R. (2002). John Keats: Selected Letters (Oxford World’s Classics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. OFSTED, Office for Standards in Education. (2012). Changes to Education Inspections Announced [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-education-inspections-announced.
  35. Pendleton-Jullian, A. (2009). Design Education and Innovation Ecotones [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://fourplusone.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/apj_paper_14.pdf.
  36. Potter, J. (2011). New literacies, new practices and learner research: Across the semi-permeable membrane between home and school. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 16(3), 174–181.Google Scholar
  37. Potter, J. (2015). Forward to the New Age of STEAM(M)! Digital Media, Education and Computing [online]. Media Literacy, Learning and Curating. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://digitalcurationandlearning.com/2015/02/25/forward-to-the-new-age-of-steamm-digital-media-education-and-computing/.
  38. Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reid, M. (2014). Film, literacy and cultural participation. In S. Brindley & B. Marshall (Eds.), Master Class in English Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning (pp. 84–98). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, K. (2013). Finding Your Element: How to Discover Your Talents and Passions and Transform Your Life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  42. Rushdie, S. (1990). Haroun and the Sea of Stories. London: Puffin/Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, D., & Usher, R. (2011). Researching Education: Data, Methods and Theory in Educational Inquiry (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  44. Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning at Not-School: A Review of Study, Theory, and Advocacy for Education in Non-formal Settings. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT & MITE.Google Scholar
  45. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native—Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Two Cars, One Night. (2004) [online]. Short film. Directed by T. Waititi. New Zealand: Defender Films Ltd. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6Pc6cBP-8U.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Cannon
    • 1
  1. 1.UCL Knowledge Lab, Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations