Advertisement

Contexts, Practices and Pedagogies

  • Michelle Cannon
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 2 looks at how moving image work is positioned in relation to academic language, and unpacks the media learning landscape with insight from classical thinking on dualisms between the empirical and the mind. Discourses that function as barriers to media-making in schools are examined, such as the decline of arts and humanities subjects, and neoliberal instrumentality related to curriculum and assessment interventions. A view of literacy as a set of social practices, inclusive of the audiovisual, is presented as cycles of media crafting, critique and artistry. These facets of media education form a framework of five interdependent dimensions attending to the complexities of modern pedagogy in digital spaces and becoming a media literate practitioner in a networked society.

Bibliography

  1. Aberdare, (Lord). (2015). Parliamentlive.tv [online]. House of Lords debate [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/8ae0f3a3-e276-48e1-b921-b6b6e7a148d8 (Time code: 11:14:22–11:23:00).
  2. Abrams, F. (2012). Cultural literacy Michael Gove’s school of hard facts. BBC Radio 4’s Analysis [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20041597.
  3. Adams, J. (2013). The English baccalaureate: A new Philistinism? International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(1), 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, R. (2014). The best that has been thought and said. Forum, 56(1) [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.robinalexander.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/19_Alexander_FORUM_56_1_web.pdf.
  5. Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J. (2013). The Education Debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Banaji, S., Buckingham, D., & Burn, A. (2006). The Rhetorics of Creativity: A Review of the Literature. London: Institute of Education, Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, M. (2001). On the problems of being a ‘trendy travesty’. In M. Barker & J. Petley (Eds.), Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate (pp. 202–224). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bassey, M., Wrigley, T., Maguire, M., & Pring, R. (2013, March 19). Gove will bury pupils in facts and rules. The Independent [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/letters-gove-will-bury-pupils-in-facts-and-rules-8540741.html.
  10. Bazalgette, C. (2010). Teaching Media in Primary Schools. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bazalgette, C. (2011). Rethinking text [online]. In Empowerment Through Literacy: Literacy Shaping Futures—UKLA 47th International Conference. Chester: UKLA, 20–31. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.ukla.org/downloads/UKLA_Chester_International_Conference_Papers_2011.pdf.
  12. Bazalgette, C., & Bearne, E. (2010). Beyond Words: Developing Children’s Understanding of Multimodal Texts. Leicester: UKLA.Google Scholar
  13. Bazalgette, C., & Buckingham, D. (2013). Literacy, media and multimodality: A critical response. Literacy, 47(2), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bazalgette, C., Parry, B., & Potter, J. (2011). Creative, cultural and critical: Media literacy theory in the primary classroom [online]. In Creative Engagements: Thinking with Children. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary.net. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bazalgettecpaper.pdf.
  15. BECTA. (2003). What the Research Says About Digital Video in Teaching and Learning [online]. Coventry: BECTA ICT Research. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.nsead.org/ict/resources/downloads/Research15_DigitalVideo.pdf.
  16. Belshaw, D. (2011). The Essential Elements of Digital Literacies [online]. Presentation to the Association of Independent Schools of New South Wales (Australia) ICT Managers Conference. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.slideshare.net/dajbelshaw/the-essential-elements-of-digital-literacies.
  17. Belshaw, D. (2012). What is Digital Literacy? A Pragmatic Investigation [online]. PhD Thesis, Durham University, Durham. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://neverendingthesis.com.
  18. Bennett, D., & Doherty, D. (2010). Innovation, education, and the maker movement [online]. In Innovation, Education, and the Maker Movement. New York: New York Hall of Science. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://nysci.org/wp-content/uploads/Maker-Faire-Report-Final.pdf.
  19. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bergala, A., Whittle, M., & Bachmann, A. (2016). The Cinema Hypothesis—Teaching Cinema in the Classroom and Beyond. Vienna: Austrian Film Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Berger, R., & Zezulkova, M. (2018). A remaking pedagogy: Adaptation and archetypes in the child’s multimodal reading and writing. Education 3–13, 46(1), 64–75.Google Scholar
  22. BFI Education. (2008). Reframing Literacy [online]. London: British Film Institute. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-education-reframing-literacy-2013-04.pdf.
  23. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Blum-Ross, A. (2013). ‘It made our eyes get bigger’: Youth film-making and place-making in East London. Visual Anthropology Review, 29(2), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2010). Film Art: An Introduction (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. boyd, d. (2008). Why youth (♥) youth social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated—The Social Lives of Networked Teens [online]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.danah.org/books/ItsComplicated.pdf.
  29. Bragg, S., & Manchester, H. (2011). Creativity, School Ethos and the Creative Partnerships Programme [online]. Newcastle upon Tyne. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from https://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/publication/creativity-school-ethos-and-the-creative-partnerships-programme/.
  30. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Buckingham, D. (1990). Watching Media Learning: Making Sense of Media Education. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond Technology: Children’s Learning in the Age of Digital Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Buckingham, D. (2010). Do we really need media education 2.0? Teaching in the age of participatory media. In K. Drotner & K. Schroder (Eds.), Digital Content Creation: Perceptions, Practices and Perspectives (pp. 287–304). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Buckingham, D., 2014a. The Success and failure of media education [online]. Media Education Research Journal, 4(2), 5–17. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://merj.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/MERJ_4-2-Editorial.pdf.
  36. Buckingham, D. (2014b). The (re-)making of media educators: Teacher identities in changing times. In P. Benson & A. Chik (Eds.), Popular Culture, Pedagogy and Teacher Education: International Perspectives (pp. 125–137). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (1994). Cultural Studies Goes to School. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  38. Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (2003). Gotta catch ‘em all: Structure, agency and pedagogy in children’s media culture. Media, Culture & Society, 25(3), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Bulfin, S., & Koutsogiannis, D. (2012). New literacies as multiply placed practices: Expanding perspectives on young people’s literacies across home and school. Language and Education, 26(4), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Bull, E. (2012). Rationales for Film in Secondary English: Subject Identity, Situated Practice and Professional Histories. Masters Dissertation, UCL, Institute of Education, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  41. Burn, A. (2009a). Making New Media: Creative Production and Digital Literacies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Burn, A. (2009b, December). Culture, art, technology: Towards a poetics of media education [online]. Cultuur + Educatie, 26. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://aburn2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/burn-towards-a-poetic-of-media-education.pdf.
  43. Burn, A. (2011). Beyond the heuristic of suspicion: The value of media literacy [online]. In A. Goodwyn & C. Fuller (Eds.), The Great Literacy Debate: A Critical Response to the Literacy Strategy and the Framework for English (pp. 8–27). London: Routledge. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://aburn2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/beyond-the-heuristic-of-suspicion.pdf.
  44. Burn, A. (2013, June). Six arguments for the media arts: Screen education in the 21st century [online]. NATE: Teaching English, 2, 55–60. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from https://aburn2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/six-arguments-for-the-media-arts.pdf.
  45. Burn, A., Brindley, S., Durran, J., Kelsall, C., Sweetlove, J., & Tuohey, C. (2001). The rush of images: A research report into digital editing and the moving image. English in Education, 35(2), 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2006). Digital anatomies: Analysis as production in media education. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and the New Media (pp. 273–293). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2007). Media Literacy in Schools: Practice, Production and Progression. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  48. Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2001). Making your mark: Digital inscription, animation and a new visual semiotic. Education, Communication and Information, 1(2), 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing Media Texts. Continuum Research Methods. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  50. Burnett, C. (2009). Research into literacy and technology in primary classrooms: An exploration of understandings generated by recent studies. Journal of Research in Reading (Special Issue: New Developments in Literacy and Technology), 31(1), 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Burnett, C. (2011a). The (im)materiality of educational space: Interactions between material, connected and textual dimensions of networked technology use in schools. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(3), 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Burnett, C. (2011b). Shifting multiple spaces in classrooms: An argument for investigating learners’ boundary-making around digital networked texts [online]. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(3). Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/uploads/1/3/6/8/136889/jlt_v12_3_burnett.pdf.
  53. Burnett, C. (2016). The Digital Age and its Implications for Learning and Teaching in the Primary School. York. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://cprtrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Burnett-report-20160720.pdf.
  54. Burnett, C., & Bailey, C. (2014). Conceptualising collaboration hybrid sites: Playing Minecraft together and apart in a primary classroom. In J. Davies, G. Merchant, & J. Rowsell (Eds.), New Literacies around the Globe: Policy and Pedagogy (Routledge Research in Literacy) (pp. 50–71). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). The (im)materiality of literacy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 90–103.Google Scholar
  56. Cannon, M. (2011). Fashioning and Flow [online]. MA Dissertation, Institute of Education, London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://fashioningandflow.wordpress.com/.
  57. Cannon, M., Bryer, T., & Lindsey, M. (2014). Media production and disruptive innovation: Exploring the interrelations between children, tablets, teachers and texts in subject English settings. Media Education Research Journal, 5(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
  58. Cannon, M., Potter, J., & Burn, A. (2018). Dynamic, playful and productive literacies. Changing English, 25(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Cantrill, C., Filipiak, D., Antero, G., Bud, H., Lee, C., Mirra, N., et al. (2014). Teaching in the connected learning classroom [online]. In A. Garcia (Ed.), Report Series on Connected Learning. Irvine, CA: The Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/teaching-in-the-CL-classroom.pdf.
  60. Connected Learning Alliance. (2015). Why Connected Learning? [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://clalliance.org/why-connected-learning/.
  61. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Craft, A. (2013). Childhood, possibility thinking and wise, humanising educational futures. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Crafts Council. (2014). Our Future is in the Making [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.craftscouncil.org.uk/content/files/7822_Education_manifesto%4014FINAL.PDF.
  64. Crawford, M. (2009). The Case for Working with your Hands: Or Why Office Work is Bad for Us and Fixing Things Feels Good. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  65. Cultural Learning Alliance. (2011). ImagineNation—The Case for Cultural Learning [online]. London. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://culturallearningalliance.org.uk/imaginenation-the-case-for-cultural-learning-published-today/.
  66. Cultural Learning Alliance. (2014). STEM + ARTS = STEAM [online]. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://culturallearningalliance.org.uk/stem-to-steam-debated-in-westminster-hall/.
  67. Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within. The International Commission on Education for the 21st Century. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  68. Dewey, J. (1997/1938). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  69. Dezuanni, M. (2014). The building blocks of digital media literacy, socio-material participation and the production of media knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–24.Google Scholar
  70. DfCMS, Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2013). Culture, Media and Sport: Commons Select Committee—Third Report [online]. Paragraphs 117 and 118. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmcumeds/674/67409.htm.
  71. DfE, Department for Education. (2010). Foreword to The Importance of Teaching [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175429/CM-7980.pdf.
  72. DfE, Department for Education. (2013). National Curriculum in England: Computing Programmes of Study [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.
  73. DfE, Department for Education. (2015). Reading: The Next Steps [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/409409/Reading_the_next_steps.pdf.
  74. DfES, Department for Education and Skills. (2005). Primary National Strategy: Excellence and Enjoyment—Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFES0110200MIG2122.pdf.
  75. EEF. (2015). Phonics | Teaching and Learning Toolkit [online]. Phonics Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/resources/teaching-learning-toolkit/phonics/.
  76. Eisner, E. (1986). The role of the arts in cognition and curriculum. Journal of Art & Design Education, 5(1–2), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Eisner, E. (2005/1985). Aesthetic modes of knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Reimagining Schools (pp. 95–104). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Eisner, E. (2005/2002a). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? [online]. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Reimagining Schools (pp. 205–214). Abingdon: Routledge. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.infed.org/biblio/eisner_arts_and_the_practice_of_education.htm.
  79. Eisner, E. (2005/2002b). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Reimagining Schools (pp. 193–204). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Eisner, E. (2006). What Do the Arts Teach? [online]. Chancellors Lecture Series, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h12MGuhQH9E.
  81. Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, Issues (pp. 3–12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Fisher, T., Higgins, C., & Loveless, A. (2006). Teachers Learning with Digital Technologies: A Review of Research and Projects. [online] Bristol: Futurelab at NFER. Retrieved May 20 2018, from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/teachers-learning-with-digital-technologies-a-review-of-research-and-projects/.
  83. FLAG (Film Literacy Advisory Group). (2013). Screening Literacy [online]. London: British Film Institute, Institute of Education, Film Education. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.bfi.org.uk/screening-literacy-film-education-europe.
  84. FLAG (Film Literacy Advisory Group). (2015). A Framework for Film Education [online]. London: British Film Institute. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-a-framework-for-film-education-brochure-2015-06-12.pdf.
  85. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design [online]. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from http://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/3/frayling_research_in_art_and_design_1993.pdf.
  86. Frayling, C. (2011). On Craftsmanship Towards a New Bauhaus. London: Oberon Books.Google Scholar
  87. Freedman, A. (1990). Teaching the text: English and media studies. In Watching Media Learning: Making Sense of Media Education (pp. 194–211). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  88. Freire, P. (1993/1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  89. Gardner, H. (2009). Five Minds for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  90. Gauntlett, D. (2011a). Making is Connecting. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  91. Gauntlett, D. (2011b). Extended book review: Making is connecting: The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to You Tube and Web 2.0 (A Conversation with McDougall, J., Readman, M., Trotman, D.) [online]. Media Education Research Journal, 2(1). Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://merj.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Gauntlett-review.pdf.
  92. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (pp. 35–48). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Gibb, N. (2015a, January 7). Schools minister Nick Gibb sets out his timetable for educational reform in Britain 2015 [online]. The Independent. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/schools/schools-minister-nick-gibb-sets-out-his-timetable-for-educational-reform-in-2015-9963751.html.
  95. Gibb, N. (2015b). The Purpose of Education [online]. Department for Education, London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-purpose-of-education.
  96. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  97. Goffman, E. (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  98. Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  99. Green, B. (1995). Post-curriculum possibilities: English teaching, cultural politics, and the postmodern turn. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(4), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Grossberg, L. (2013). Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Grundin, H. (2018). Policy and evidence: A critical analysis of the year 1 phonics screening check in England. Literacy, 52(1), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Haas Dyson, A. (1997). Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  104. Hagel, J., & Seely Brown, J. (2005). From Push to Pull—Emerging Models for Mobilizing Resources [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.johnhagel.com/paper_pushpull.pdf.
  105. Hall, S. (1991). Ethnicity: Identity and difference. Radical America, 23(4), 9–20.Google Scholar
  106. Harré, R. (1983). Personal Being—A Theory for Individual Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  107. Hawkins, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2005). On Intelligence. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  108. Hirsch, E. D. (2006). The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American Children. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  109. Instrell, M. (2011). Breaking barriers: Multimodal and media literacy in the curriculum for excellence. Media Education Journal, 49, 4–11.Google Scholar
  110. Ito, M. (2009). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  111. Ito, M., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., et al. (2013). Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design [online]. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://dmlhub.net/wp-content/uploads/files/Connected_Learning_report.pdf.
  112. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  113. Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  114. Jenkins, H., Purushota, R., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century [online]. Chicago: The John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF.
  115. Jewitt, C. (2008). The Visual in Learning and Creativity: A Review of the Literature [online]. Creative Partnership Series, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/publication/the-visual-in-learning-and-creativity-a-review-of-the-literature/.
  116. Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Kaplan, I. (2008). Being ‘seen’, being ‘heard’: Engaging with students on the margins of education through participatory photography. In P. Thomson (Ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People (pp. 175–191). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  118. KAVI, Finnish Media Education Authority. (2013). Finnish Media Education [online]. Helsinki: National Audiovisual Institute. Retrieved from https://kavi.fi/sites/default/files/documents/mil_in_finland.pdf
  119. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2010). DIY Media: Creating, Sharing and Learning with New Technologies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  121. Koh, A. (2014). The Political Power of Play [online]. Hybrid Pedagogies. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/political-power-of-play/.
  122. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  123. Lanham, R. A. (1994). The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  124. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  125. Laughey, D. (2012). Media Studies 1.0: Back to basics. Media Education Research Journal, 2(2), 57–64.Google Scholar
  126. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Leander, K., & Frank, A. (2006). The aesthetic production and distribution of image/subjects among online youth. E-Learning, 3(2), 185–206.Google Scholar
  128. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  129. Livingstone, I., & Hope, A. (2011). Next Gen Report. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
  130. Lord, P., Jones, M., Harland, J., Bazalgette, C., Reid, M., Potter, J., et al. (2007). Special Effects: The Distinctiveness of Learning Outcomes in Relation to Moving Image Education Projects: Final Report [online]. London: Creative Partnerships. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/special-effects-the-distinctiveness-of-learning-outcomes-in-relation-to-moving-image-education-projects-final-report/.
  131. Maeda, J. (2013). Foreword to. In R. Somerson & M. L. Hermano (Eds.), The Art of Critical Making: Rhode Island School of Design on Creative Practice (pp. 5–9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  132. Maker Faire. (2017). World Maker Faire | New York 2017 [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://makerfaire.com/.
  133. Maker Faire UK. (2015). Brighton Mini Maker Faire [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://makerfairebrighton.com/.
  134. Maker Media Inc. (2014). Maker Faire: A Bit of History [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://makerfaire.com/makerfairehistory/.
  135. Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  136. Marsh, J. (2009). Play, creativity and digital cultures. In R. Willett, M. Robinson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Play, Creativity and Digital Cultures (pp. 216–218). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  137. Marsh, J. (2010). Childhood, Culture and Creativity: A Literature Review [online]. Newcastle. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/publication/childhood-culture-and-creativity-a-literature-review/.
  138. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. McDougall, J., & Potter, J. (2015). Curating media learning: Towards a porous expertise. Journal of E-learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. MEA, Media Education Association. (2015). MEA Response to the Consultations [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.themea.org.uk/2015/09/mea-response-to-the-consultations/.
  141. Merchant, G. (2006). Identity, social networks and online communication. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(2), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation [online]. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 8–20. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/1102/1/Merchant_draft2.pdf.
  143. Merchant, G. (2010). 3D virtual worlds as environments for literacy learning [online]. Educational Research, 52(2), 135–150. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/1206/1/Final_GM_Ed_Res.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Monbiot, G. (2016). Neoliberalism—The Ideology at the Root of All Our Problems [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot.
  145. Morgan, N. (2014, November 10). Nicky Morgan Speaks at Launch of Your Life Campaign [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nicky-morgan-speaks-at-launch-of-your-life-campaign.
  146. Morgan, N. (2015). Education secretary Nicky Morgan: ‘Arts subjects limit career choices’ [online]. The Stage News. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.thestage.co.uk/news/2014/11/education-secretary-nicky-morgan-arts-subjects-limit-career-choices/.
  147. Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  148. Mumford, S., Parry, B., & Walker, G. (2013). Pockets of Excellence: Film Education in Yorkshire and the Humber [online]. Leeds: IVE Creative(formerly CAPEUK). Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://weareive.org/impact/pockets-excellence-film-education-yorkshire-humber/.
  149. Murch, W. (2001). In the Blink of an Eye: A Perspective on Film Editing. Los Angeles: Silman-James Press.Google Scholar
  150. NACCE, National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. (1999). All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education [online]. London: DCMS. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://sirkenrobinson.com/pdf/allourfutures.pdf.
  151. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. NUT, National Union of Teachers. (2014). Reclaiming Schools—The Evidence and the Arguments [online]. National Union of Teachers. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://radicaled.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/reclaiming-schools.pdf.
  153. NYHS, New York Hall of Science, Maker Faire. (2012). Design-make-play conference: Growing the next generation of science innovators [online]. In Design-Make-Play Conference: Growing the Next Generation of Science Innovators. New York: New York Hall of Science. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.yingtrsef.org/wp-content/uploads/DesignMakePlay_Report-2012.pdf.
  154. Ong, W. (2002/1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word [online]. London: Routledge. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://dss-edit.com/prof-anon/sound/library/Ong_orality_and_literacy.pdf.
  155. Parry, B. (2014). Popular culture, participation and progression in the literacy classroom. Literacy, 48(1), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Parry, B., & Hill Bulman, J. (2017). Film Education, Literacy and Learning. Leicester: UKLA.Google Scholar
  157. Pendleton-Jullian, A. (2009). Design Education and Innovation Ecotones [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://fourplusone.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/apj_paper_14.pdf.
  158. Peppler, K. (2013). New Opportunities for Interest-Driven Arts Learning in a Digital Age. New York: The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  159. Peppler, K., & Kafai, Y. (2007). From Supergoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Petersen, S. M. (2008). Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation [online]. First Monday. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2141/1948.
  161. Polanyi, M. (2009/1967). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  162. Potter, J. (2009). Curating the Self: Media Literacy and Identity in Digital Video Production by Young Learners. PhD Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  163. Potter, J. (2011). New literacies, new practices and learner research: Across the semi-permeable membrane between home and school. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 16(3), 174–181.Google Scholar
  164. Potter, J. (2012). Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Potter, J. (2015). Forward to the New Age of STEAM(M)! Digital Media, Education and Computing [online]. Media Literacy, Learning and Curating. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://digitalcurationandlearning.com/2015/02/25/forward-to-the-new-age-of-steamm-digital-media-education-and-computing/.
  166. Potter, J., & Bryer, T. (2014). Out of the Box: A Project Evaluation Report for Shoot Smart. London: DARE, Digital, Arts, Research, Education.Google Scholar
  167. Potter, J., & Bryer, T. (2016). ‘Finger flowment’ and moving image language: Learning filmmaking with tablet devices. In B. Parry, C. Burnett, & G. Merchant (Eds.), Literacy, Media, Technology: Past, Present and Future (pp. 111–128). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  168. Potter, J., & Gilje, Ø. (2015). Curation as a new literacy practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of Educational Research (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  172. Qian, Y. (2009). New media literacy in 3-D virtual learning environments. In L. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and Challenges (pp. 257–270). New York: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Quinlan, O. (2015). Young Digital Makers: Surveying Attitudes and Opportunities for Digital Creativity Across the UK [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/youngdigmakers.pdf.
  174. Readman, M. (2010). Whatʼs in a Word? The Discursive Construction of ʻCreativityʼ. PhD Thesis, Centre for Excellence in Media Practice (CEMP), University of Bournemouth, Bournemouth.Google Scholar
  175. Reid, A. (2007). The Two Virtuals: New Media and Composition. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
  176. Reid, M. (2003). Writing film: Making inferences when viewing and reading. Literacy (formerly Reading), 37(3), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Reid, M. (2009). Reframing literacy: A film pitch for the 21st century. English Drama Media: The Professional Journal of the National Association for the Teaching of English, 14, 19–23.Google Scholar
  178. Reid, M. (2014). Film, literacy and cultural participation. In S. Brindley & B. Marshall (Eds.), Master Class in English Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning (pp. 84–98). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  179. Reid, M., Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2002). Evaluation Report of the BECTA Digital Video Pilot [online]. BECTA/BFI. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://archive.teachfind.com/becta/research.becta.org.uk/index9a09.html.
  180. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our Minds: Learning to be Creative (2nd ed.). Chichester: Capstone.Google Scholar
  181. Robinson, K. (2013). Finding Your Element: How to Discover Your Talents and Passions and Transform Your Life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  182. Rosen, M. (2013). Michael Rosen: Phonics: A summary of my views. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/phonics-summary-of-my-views.html.
  183. Ross, M., Mitchell, S., Bierton, C., & Radnor, H. (1993). Assessing Achievement in the Arts. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  184. Schmidt, E. (2011). MacTaggart Lecture, Edinburgh TV Festival [online]. Edinburgh TV Festival. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.theguardian.com/media/interactive/2011/aug/26/eric-schmidt-mactaggart-lecture-full-text.
  185. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1981). Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  186. Scottish Screen. (2006). Moving Image Education & a Curriculum for Excellence [online]. Glasgow. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.movingimageeducation.org/files/pdfs/mie-and-a-curriculum-for-excellence-2006-booklet.pdf.
  187. Sefton-Green, J. (1990). Teaching and learning about representation: Culture and The Cosby Show in a North London comprehensive. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Watching Media Learning: Making Sense of Media Education (pp. 127–150). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  188. Sefton-Green, J. (1998). ‘Writing’ Media: An Investigation of Practical Production in Media Education by Secondary School Students. PhD Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  189. Sefton-Green, J. (2000). From creativity to cultural production. In J. Sefton-Green & R. Sinker (Eds.), Evaluating Creativity: Making and Learning by Young People (pp. 216–231). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  190. Sefton-Green, J. (2005). Timelines, timeframes and special effects: Software and creative media production. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Sefton-Green, J. (2008). Creative Learning [online]. London: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/creative-learning-booklet-26-233.pdf.
  192. Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Mapping Digital Makers: A Review Exploring Everyday Creativity, Learning Lives and the Digital. State of the Art Reviews. London: Nominet Trust.Google Scholar
  193. Sellar, S., Rutkowski, D., & Thompson, G. (2017). The Global Education Race: Taking the Measure of PISA and International Testing. Edmonton, Canada: Brush Education Inc..Google Scholar
  194. Selwyn, N. (2006). Dealing with digital inequality: Rethinking young people, technology and social Inclusion. Conference paper: Cyberworld Unlimited? Digital Inequality and New Spaces of Informal Education for Young People, Bielefeld, Germany, 9 February 2006.Google Scholar
  195. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native—Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Selwyn, N. (2016). Is Technology Good for Education? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  197. Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  198. Shirky, C. (2009). Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happens When People Come Together. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  199. Shirky, C. (2011). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  200. Sinker, R. (2000). Making multimedia—Evaluating young people’s creative multimedia production. In Evaluating Creativity (pp. 187–215). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  201. Snow, C. P. (1961). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/snow_1959.pdf.
  202. Soja, E. (1999). Third space: Expanding the scope of the geographical imagination. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human Geography Today (pp. 260–278). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  203. Somerson, R., & Hermano, M. L. (2013). The Art of Critical Making: Rhode Island School of Design on Creative Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  204. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  205. Street, B. (1995). Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  206. Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
  207. Teachmeet Wiki. (2018). TeachMeet/FrontPage [online]. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from http://teachmeet.pbworks.com/w/page/19975349/FrontPage
  208. Thomas, M. (Ed.). (2011). Deconstructing Digital Natives: Young People, Technology, and the New Literacies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  209. Thomson, P., Hall, C., Jones, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2012). The Signature Pedagogies Project: Final Report [online]. London and Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Creativity, Culture and Education. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/Signature_Pedagogies_Final_Report_April_2012.pdf.
  210. Truss, E. (2013). Elizabeth Truss Speaks about Curriculum Reform [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/elizabeth-truss-speaks-about-curriculum-reform.
  211. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  212. Vygotsky, L. (2002/1933). Play and its Role in the Mental Development of the Child [online]. Psychology and Marxism Internet Archive. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1933/play.htm.
  213. Watters, A. (2015). Ed-Tech Guide: What Should You Know About Education Technology? [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://guide.hackeducation.com.
  214. Waugh, C. (2015). The Edutronic [online]. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://www.edutronic.net/.
  215. Waugh, C. (2016). Connecting text. In J. McDougall & P. Bennett (Eds.), Doing Text: Teaching Media After the Subject. Leighton Buzzard: Auteur.Google Scholar
  216. Waugh, C. (2017). Rebel Education: Pick Your Teacher—Democratic Schooling in the UK. Aljazeera website. Retrieved March 12, 2017, from http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/rebel-education/2016/12/pick-teacher-democratic-schooling-uk-161220141451434.html.
  217. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Systems Thinker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Williams, F. (2004). What matters is who works: Why every child matters to new labour. Commentary on the DfES Green Paper Every Child Matters. Critical Social Policy, 24(3), 406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  220. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  221. Williamson, B. (2014). Political computational thinking: Cross-sector policy networks in the construction of learning to code in the new computing curriculum. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Institute of Education, University of London, 23–25 September 2014.Google Scholar
  222. Williamson, B. (2017a). Big Data in Education The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  223. Williamson, B. (2017b). Learning in the “platform society”: Disassembling an educational data assemblage. Research in Education, 98(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Willingham, D. T. (2012). When Can You Trust the Experts? How to Tell Good Science from Bad in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  225. Wohlwend, K., & Peppler K. (2015). All rigor and no play is no way to improve learning [online]. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(8), 22–26. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from http://kpeppler.com/Docs/2015_Peppler_All-Rigor-No-Play.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Wolf, A. (2011). Review of Vocational Education: The Wolf Report [online]. London. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-vocational-education-the-wolf-report.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Cannon
    • 1
  1. 1.UCL Knowledge Lab, Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations