Advertisement

Tip Chapter: Peels for Ethnic Skin

  • Renan Lage
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Created in 1976, the Fitzpatrick scale (FST) classified the skin into six types (I–VI). The classification is based on each individual’s skin response to sun exposure and the susceptibility to tanning or burning when exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Types IV, V, and VI are known as “skin of color” or ethnic skin, contemplating individuals who tan easily and usually do not burn.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaidi Z. Skin of colour: characteristics and disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(2):292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor SC. Skin of color: biology, structure, function, and implications for dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:S41–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rawlings AV. Ethnic skin type: are there differences in skin structure and function? Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;28(2):79–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grimes PE. Agents for ethnic skin peeling. Dermatol Ther. 2000;13:159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salam A, Dadzie OE, Galadari H. Chemical peeling in ethnic skin: an update. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(Suppl 2):82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bryan CP. Ancient Egyptian medicine: the Papyrus Ebers [translation]. Chicago: Ares Publishers; 1974. p. 158–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brody HJ, Monheit GD, Resnik SS, Alt TH. A history of chemical peeling. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:405–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackee GM, Karp FL. The treatment of post acne scars with phenol. Br J Dermatol. 1952;64:456–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eller JJ, Wolff S. Skin peeling and scarification. JAMA. 1941;116:934–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer TC, Perosino E, Poli F, Viera MS, Dreno B, Cosmetic Dermatology European Expert Group. Chemical peels in aesthetic dermatology: an update 2009. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(3):281–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khunger N. Standard guidelines of care for chemical peels. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74(Suppl):S5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yokomizo VMF, Benemond TMH, Chisaki C, Benemond PH. Peelings químicos: revisão e aplicação prática. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2013;5(1):58–68.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nanda S, Grover C, Reddy BS. Efficacy of hydroquinone (2%) versus tretinoin (0.025%) as adjunct topical agents for chemical peeling in patients of melasma. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:385–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarkar R, Bansal S, Garg VK. Chemical peels for melasma in dark-skinned patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2012;5(4):247–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang CM, Huang CL, Hu CT, Chan HL. The effect of glycolic acid on the treatment of acne in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(1):23–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burns RL, Prevost-Blank PL, Lawry MA, Lawry TB, Faria DT, Fivenson DP. Glycolic acid peels for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in black patients. A comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(3):171–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee SH, Huh CH, Park KC, Youn SW. Effects of repetitive superficial chemical peels on facial sebum secretion in acne patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(8):964–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takenaka Y, Hayashi N, Takeda M, et al. Glycolic acid chemical peeling improves inflammatory acne eruptions through its inhibitory and bactericidal effects on Propionibacterium acnes. J Dermatol. 2012;39:350–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erbil H, Sezer E, Taştan B, Arca E, Kurumlu Z. Efficacy and safety of serial glycolic acid peels and a topical regimen in the treatment of recalcitrant melasma. J Dermatol. 2007;34(1):25–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grover C, Reddu BS. The therapeutic value of glycolic acid peels in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69:148–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Javaheri SM, Handa S, Kaur I, Kumar B. Safety and efficacy of glycolic acid facial peel in Indian women with melasma. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40(5):354–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sachdeva S. Lactic acid peeling in superficial acne scarring in Indian skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;9:246–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharquie KE, Al-Tikreety MM, Al-Mashhadani SA. Lactic acid as a new therapeutic peeling agent in melasma. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:149–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharquie KE, Al-Tikreety MM, Al-Mashhadani SA. Lactic acid chemical peels as a new therapeutic modality in melasma in comparison to Jessner’s solution chemical peels. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:1429–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts WE. Chemical peeling in ethnic/dark skin. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(2):196–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahn HH, Kim IH. Whitening effect of salicylic acid peels in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:372–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grimes PE. The safety and efficacy of salicylic acid chemical peels in darker racial-ethnic groups. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(1):18–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee HS, Kim IH. Salicylic acid peels for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:1196–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khunger N, Sarkar R, Jain RK. Tretinoin peels versus glycolic acid peels in the treatment of Melasma in dark-skinned patients. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(5):756–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim SW, Moon SE, Kim JA, et al. Glycolic acid versus Jessner’s solution: which is better for facial acne patients? A randomized prospective clinical trial of split-face model therapy. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:270–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Safoury OS, Zaki NM, El Nabarawy EA, et al. A study comparing chemical peeling using modified Jessner’s solution and 15% trichloroacetic acid versus 15% trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of melasma. Indian J Dermatol. 2009;54:41–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abdel-Mequid AM, Taha EA, Ismail SA. Combined Jessner solution and trichloroacetic acid versus trichloroacetic acid alone in the treatment of melasma in dark-skinned patients. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(5):651–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mangat DS, Tansavadti K, Garlich P. Current chemical peels and other resurfacing techniques. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27(1):35–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chun EY, Lee JB, Lee KH. Focal trichloroacetic acid peel method for benign pigmented lesions in dark-skinned patients. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 1):512–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kalla G, Garg A, Kachhawa D. Chemical peeling – glycolic acid versus trichloroacetic acid in melasma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2001;67:82–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Costa A, Basile AVD, Medeiros VLS, Moisés TA, Ota FS, Palandi JAC. 10% thioglycolic acid gel peels: a safe and efficient option in the treatment of constitutional infraorbital hyperpigmentation. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;2(1):29–33.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kontochristopoulos G, Platsidaki E. Chemical peels in active acne and acne scars. Clin Dermatol. 2017;35(2):179–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sarkar R, Garg V, Bansal S, Sethi S, Gupta C. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of glycolic acid, salicylic mandelic acid, and phytic acid combination peels in melasma. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(3):384–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Camacho FM. Medium-depth and deep chemical peels. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2005;4(2):117–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marrero GM, Katz BE. The new fluor-hydroxy pulse peel. A combination of 5-fluorouracil and glycolic acid. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(9):973–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Teixeira SP, de Nascimento MM, Bagatin E, Hassun KM, Talarico S, Michalany N. The use of fluor-hydroxy pulse peel in actinic porokeratosis. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 1):1145–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Parada MB, Yarak S, Gouvea LG, Hassun K, Talarico S, Bagatin E. “Blepharopeeling” in the upper eyelids: a nonincisional procedure in periorbital rejuvenation FA pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:1435–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renan Lage
    • 1
  1. 1.Cosmiatric Department, Department of Dermatology of the Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas - PUC CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations