On Mechanical Characteristics of HFRP Bars with Various Types of Hybridization

  • Andrzej Garbacz
  • Elzbieta Szmigiera
  • Kostiantyn Protchenko
  • Marek Urbanski
Conference paper

Abstract

The principal objective of this study is to elaborate the reliable properties for hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (HFRP) bars, which will have the potential to be considered as a competitive alternative to conventional reinforcement for concrete structures. Understanding mechanical performance of HFRP bars with various types of hybridization will allow for more precise design estimations that will balance safety and cost. Numerical modeling of tensile strength test was performed for hybrid carbon/glass fiber-reinforced polymer (HC/GFRP) bars and hybrid carbon/basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (HC/BFRP) bars with the use of finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. The variable parameters were two factors: the bar configuration and volume fraction of fibers. Results indicate that for both HC/GFRP and HC/BFRP bars, the location of carbon fibers in the near-surface region is more appropriate when the volume fraction of carbon fibers is less than volume fraction of glass (or basalt) fibers; otherwise, it is better to locate carbon fibers in the core region. Results of numerical modeling were considered for producing HFRP bars for further experimental investigations.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    ACI 440.4R-04. (2011). Prestressing Concrete Structures with FRP Tendons (Reapproved). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Protchenko, K., Młodzik, K., Urbański, M., Szmigiera, E., & Garbacz, A. (2016). Numerical estimation of concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars. In MATEC web of conferences (Vol. 86, p. 02011). EDP Sciences. Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garbacz, A., Urbański, M., & Łapko, A. (2015). BFRP bars as an alternative reinforcement of concrete structures – Compatibility and adhesion issues. Advanced Materials Research, 1129, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garbacz, A., Szmigiera, E., Urbański, M., Protchenko, K., & Kubas, M. (2017). Research on hybrid FRP reinforcement for concrete infrastructure. In Inzynieria I Budownictwo (Vol. 73/8, pp. 428–432). BazTech [in Polish]. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Voigt, W. (1889). Uber die beziehung zwischen den beiden elasticitatsconstanten isotroper korper. Annalen der Physik, 38, 573–587. [in German].CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black, T., & Kosher, R. (2008). Non metallic materials: Plastic, elastomers, ceramics and composites. In Materials and processing in manufacturing (10th ed., pp. 162–194). Wiley. ISBN 978-0470-05512-0. Indianopolis, USA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbero, E. J. (2011). Introduction to composite materials design (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakis, C. E., Nanni, A., Terosky, J. A., & Koehler, S. W. (2001). Self-monitoring, pseudo-ductile, hybrid FRP reinforcement rods for concrete applications. Composites Science and Technology, 61, 815–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Garbacz
    • 1
  • Elzbieta Szmigiera
    • 1
  • Kostiantyn Protchenko
    • 1
  • Marek Urbanski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations