Advertisement

Innovation Commercialisation: Processes, Tools and Implications

  • Mikko PynnönenEmail author
  • Jukka Hallikas
  • Mika Immonen
Chapter

Abstract

Innovation commercialisation is a new direction in the literature. The challenge in these commercialisation-related activities is that they must simultaneously take into account the processes of generating innovations, developing products and services based on these aforementioned processes and then forming a business model around the product-service system. We see innovation commercialisation as a process that aims to create and implement a feasible business model for an innovation-based product-service system in the surrounding business ecosystem. This view builds on the literature on business model innovation, where the business model is seen as a value-creating subsystem in a complex system of business models, that is, within the business ecosystem. In our chapter, we describe a process that is used in more than 40 innovation commercialisation projects. The process has been developed and modified to serve the different needs of various innovation development groups. The process is iterative and has been divided into two parts: (1) proof of relevance and (2) in-depth development. We highlight the targets in the distinct stages of the process, the specific challenges related to the stages, tools and processes to tackle these challenges and the best practices based on the cases we have been investigating. Finally, we conclude the lessons learned, bringing them together into managerial implications that show how to get the best results out of innovation commercialisation projects.

References

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Lehtimäki, T. (2014). Commercializing a radical innovation: Probing the way to the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2014.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Rasgado, T., Thompson, G., & Elfström, B.-O. (2004). The design of functional (total care) products. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(6), 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820412331271176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, M., & Xiao, J. (2016). Acquisitions of start-ups by incumbent businesses: A market selection process of “high-quality” entrants? Research Policy, 45(1), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2015.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5314–5330. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741741300225XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung, W. W. C., Yam, A. Y. K., & Chan, M. F. S. (2004). Networked enterprise: A new business model for global sourcing. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00222-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N. (1999). Modular product architecture. Design Studies, 22, 30–38. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/destudCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dubois, A., Hulthén, K., & Pedersen, A.-C. (2004). Supply chains and interdependence: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PURSUP.2003.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2011). Designing solutions around customer network identity goals. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.2.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geum, Y., Lee, S., Kang, D., & Park, Y. (2011). Technology roadmapping for technology-based product–service integration: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(3), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2011.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holcomb, T. R., & Hitt, M. A. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOM.2006.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobides, M. G. (2005). Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G. (2005). The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karatzas, A., Johnson, M., & Bastl, M. (2016). Relationship determinants of performance in service triads: A configurational approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., et al. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Research-Technology Management, 44(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Roehrich, J. K., & Caldwell, N. D. (2012). Delivering integrated solutions in the public sector: The unbundling paradox. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(6), 995–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2012.01.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomke, S., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74–81. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6413837&site=ehost-live
  22. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Timmers, P. (2000). Electronic commerce: Strategies and models for business to business trading. Wiley. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=555419
  24. Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. ELSEVIER Research Policy, 24, 419–441. Retrieved from https://ac.els-cdn.com/0048733394007753/1-s2.0-0048733394007753-main.pdf?_tid=6fedb1d0-f9e2-11e7-91a6-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1516013839_970f079eb9a4423c5bd0fa47d48c9e59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations